| Title | Relation as Key to God’s Knowledge of Particulars in the Tahāfut al- tahāfut and the Damīma: A Cross-talk between Averroes, al-Ghazālī and Avicenna |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2020 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1–26 |
| Categories | Avicenna, al-Ġazālī, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article deals with the divine knowledge of particulars in Averroes’ Tahāfut al-tahāfut and Ḍamīma. It examines how the concept of relation, generally neglected, is at the heart of the dispute between Avicenna, al-Ġazālī, and the Commentator. In al-Ġazālī’s eyes, Avicenna's misconception of divine knowledge “in a universal way” is based on a misuse of relation in the case of God's knowledge. If particulars change and God does not, his knowledge of particulars, insofar as it undergoes change, can be considered a pure relation without ontological consequences. Averroes contests both al-Ġazālī’s criticism and his proposal, despite the fact that, for different reasons involving the coming-to-be of human knowledge, he too employs the notion of pure relation in his Long Commentary on the Physics. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5038","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5038,"authors_free":[{"id":5785,"entry_id":5038,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Relation as Key to God\u2019s Knowledge of Particulars in the Tah\u0101fut al- tah\u0101fut and the Dam\u012bma: A Cross-talk between Averroes, al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Avicenna","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Relation as Key to God\u2019s Knowledge of Particulars in the Tah\u0101fut al- tah\u0101fut and the Dam\u012bma: A Cross-talk between Averroes, al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Avicenna"},"abstract":"This article deals with the divine knowledge of particulars in Averroes\u2019 Tah\u0101fut al-tah\u0101fut and \u1e0cam\u012bma. It examines how the concept of relation, generally neglected, is at the heart of the dispute between Avicenna, al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b, and the Commentator. In al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b\u2019s eyes, Avicenna's misconception of divine knowledge \u201cin a universal way\u201d is based on a misuse of relation in the case of God's knowledge. If particulars change and God does not, his knowledge of particulars, insofar as it undergoes change, can be considered a pure relation without ontological consequences. Averroes contests both al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b\u2019s criticism and his proposal, despite the fact that, for different reasons involving the coming-to-be of human knowledge, he too employs the notion of pure relation in his Long Commentary on the Physics.","btype":3,"date":"2020","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1017\/S0957423919000109","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5038,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"20","issue":"1","pages":"1\u201326"}},"sort":[2020]}
| Title | Avicenne et Averroès contre Galien: Quelques lectures universitaires de leurs critiques (XIVe-XVe S.) |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2020 |
| Published in | Contre Galien. Critiques d’une autorité médicale de l’Antiquité à l’âge moderne |
| Pages | 199–214 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Danielle Jacquart |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5050","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5050,"authors_free":[{"id":5800,"entry_id":5050,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":137,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Danielle Jacquart","free_first_name":"Danielle","free_last_name":"Jacquart","norm_person":{"id":137,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Danielle Jacquart","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/129655377","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/88036254","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd129655376.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Danielle Jacquart"}}],"entry_title":"Avicenne et Averro\u00e8s contre Galien: Quelques lectures universitaires de leurs critiques (XIVe-XVe S.)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Avicenne et Averro\u00e8s contre Galien: Quelques lectures universitaires de leurs critiques (XIVe-XVe S.)"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2020","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":137,"full_name":"Danielle Jacquart","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5050,"section_of":5039,"pages":"199\u2013214","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5039,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Contre Galien. Critiques d\u2019une autorit\u00e9 m\u00e9dicale de l\u2019Antiquit\u00e9 \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e2ge moderne","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2020","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"Galien de Pergame (129-ca 216) a syst\u00e9matis\u00e9 l'ensemble du savoir m\u00e9dical ancien et sa doctrine s'est maintenue jusqu'\u00e0 l'\u00e9poque moderne. Son oeuvre tentaculaire a aussi innerv\u00e9 la pens\u00e9e philosophique, logique et th\u00e9ologique. Toutefois, Galien a fait l'objet de critiques de la part de ses contemporains, puis de ses successeurs. Apr\u00e8s le triomphe du gal\u00e9nisme \u00e0 la fin de l'Antiquit\u00e9, les penseurs islamiques ont introduit les premi\u00e8res br\u00e8ches dans ce syst\u00e8me. Ces attaques, relay\u00e9es en Occident latin et \u00e0 Byzance, ont connu une ampleur nouvelle \u00e0 la Renaissance avec la remise en cause et la d\u00e9construction de l'autorit\u00e9 gal\u00e9nique. Dans ce livre est propos\u00e9e une histoire dynamique de la r\u00e9ception de Galien \u00e0 travers diff\u00e9rents cas d'anti-gal\u00e9nismes. Les \u00e9tudes qui y sont r\u00e9unies portent sur des textes peu connus, voire in\u00e9dits. Elles recensent les critiques contre Galien, tout en explorant diff\u00e9rentes facettes de sa pens\u00e9e m\u00e9dicale et philosophique. Ce parcours permet ainsi de suivre les changements de paradigmes \u00e9pist\u00e9mologiques qui s'op\u00e8rent au fil des si\u00e8cles, mais aussi de mieux cerner, par la n\u00e9gative, ce que fut le gal\u00e9nisme durant sa longue tradition.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5039,"pubplace":" Paris","publisher":"Honor\u00e9 Champion","series":"Sciences techniques ","volume":"21","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2020]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd’s Criticism of the Theory of the Inherence of the Specific Property (khāssa) in Medicine |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2020 |
| Journal | Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 33–48 |
| Categories | Medicine, Galen, Avicenna, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Yu Hoki |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In Medieval Arabic medical texts, a specific property (khāṣṣa) is thought to be one of the effects of a medicine, and effective in a specific humor or organ. This property is mainly mentioned to explain two phenomena, purgative medicines' attraction of a certain humor and theriacas strengthening of human innate heat. Galen had advocated the theory that the faculty of attracting a specific material inheres in a medical substance as its nature (referred to as the theory of inherence). The same view can be seen in the texts of Islamic philosopher-physicians such as Ibn Sīnā (d. 1037). On the other hand, Ibn Rushd (d. 1198) perceived the defects of this theory and criticised it. This article examines his criticism of the theory of inherence in his discussions about purgative medicines and theriacas. Ibn Rushd says that using the theory of inheritance, we cannot explain the phenomenon that when someone takes more than one dose of purgative medicine, it attracts not only the specific humor, but all of the humors. He then proposes the alternative theory that the specific property originates in the proportions of the qualities in the attracting and the attracted materials. From this perspective, he insists that the object of attraction varies according to the amount of the heat in the medicine. As for theriaca, Ibn Rushd criticises the theory of inherence as seen in the writings of Ibn Sīnā Ibn Sīnā claims that theriaca's specific property is generated from its substance, i.e. the combination of form with matter, not the mixture of the four qualities. But according to Ibn Rushd, with this explanation, it is impossible to explain the body's various responses to theriaca. Therefore he maintains that one must explain its specific property in terms of the four qualities. To conclude, Ibn Rushd considers his theory to be more capable of explaining various phenomena than the theory of inherence is. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5049","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5049,"authors_free":[{"id":5799,"entry_id":5049,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yu Hoki","free_first_name":"Yu","free_last_name":"Hoki","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s Criticism of the Theory of the Inherence of the Specific Property (kh\u0101ssa) in Medicine","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s Criticism of the Theory of the Inherence of the Specific Property (kh\u0101ssa) in Medicine"},"abstract":"In Medieval Arabic medical texts, a specific property (kh\u0101\u1e63\u1e63a) is thought to be one of the effects of a medicine, and effective in a specific humor or organ. This property is mainly mentioned to explain two phenomena, purgative medicines' attraction of a certain humor and theriacas strengthening of human innate heat. Galen had advocated the theory that the faculty of attracting a specific material inheres in a medical substance as its nature (referred to as the theory of inherence). The same view can be seen in the texts of Islamic philosopher-physicians such as Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 (d. 1037). On the other hand, Ibn Rushd (d. 1198) perceived the defects of this theory and criticised it. This article examines his criticism of the theory of inherence in his discussions about purgative medicines and theriacas.\r\nIbn Rushd says that using the theory of inheritance, we cannot explain the phenomenon that when someone takes more than one dose of purgative medicine, it attracts not only the specific humor, but all of the humors. He then proposes the alternative theory that the specific property originates in the proportions of the qualities in the attracting and the attracted materials. From this perspective, he insists that the object of attraction varies according to the amount of the heat in the medicine.\r\nAs for theriaca, Ibn Rushd criticises the theory of inherence as seen in the writings of Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 claims that theriaca's specific property is generated from its substance, i.e. the combination of form with matter, not the mixture of the four qualities. But according to Ibn Rushd, with this explanation, it is impossible to explain the body's various responses to theriaca. Therefore he maintains that one must explain its specific property in terms of the four qualities.\r\nTo conclude, Ibn Rushd considers his theory to be more capable of explaining various phenomena than the theory of inherence is. ","btype":3,"date":"2020","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.5356\/jorient.57.1_33","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":29,"category_name":"Medicine","link":"bib?categories[]=Medicine"},{"id":30,"category_name":"Galen","link":"bib?categories[]=Galen"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5049,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Bulletin of the Society for Near Eastern Studies in Japan","volume":"57","issue":"1","pages":"33\u201348"}},"sort":[2020]}
| Title | The First as Pure Act and Causality: The Case of Ibn Rushd |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2020 |
| Published in | Islam, causality, and freedom: from the medieval to the modern era |
| Pages | 83–99 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Neoplatonism, Avicenna, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | Özgür Koca |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The fourth chapter examines Ibn Rushd’s account of causality. It will be argued that Ibn Rushd’s theory of causality comes very close to Neo-Platonistic participatory accounts, despite his strong Aristotelian tendencies. Ibn Rushd, like Ibn Sīnā, finds the basis of causal efficacy of entities in their participation in the pure existence-act of the First. The most important implication of this understanding of causality is that despite the occasionalist critique that we do not and cannot observe a necessary connection between cause and effect, for Ibn Rushd, the moment one defines existence as pure act, it metaphysically makes more sense to accept causal efficacy of entities, for they participate in the pure existence-act of the First. The chapter also examines the differences between Ibn Sīnā and Ibn Rushd that stem from the latter’s efforts to address some of Ghazālī’s challenges. Ibn Rushd agrees with Ghazālī in that plurality can emanate from the First without emanationist intermediation and solely based on the nature-capacity-form of beings. This view establishes a closer connection between the First’s existence-act and the world than Ibn Sīnā’s metaphysics allows. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5395","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5395,"authors_free":[{"id":6253,"entry_id":5395,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1807,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"\u00d6zg\u00fcr Koca","free_first_name":"\u00d6zg\u00fcr","free_last_name":"Koca","norm_person":{"id":1807,"first_name":"\u00d6zg\u00fcr","last_name":"Koca","full_name":"\u00d6zg\u00fcr Koca","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1101389664","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=\u00d6zg\u00fcr Koca"}}],"entry_title":"The First as Pure Act and Causality: The Case of Ibn Rushd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The First as Pure Act and Causality: The Case of Ibn Rushd"},"abstract":"The fourth chapter examines Ibn Rushd\u2019s account of causality. It will be argued that Ibn Rushd\u2019s theory of causality comes very close to Neo-Platonistic participatory accounts, despite his strong Aristotelian tendencies. Ibn Rushd, like Ibn S\u012bn\u0101, finds the basis of causal efficacy of entities in their participation in the pure existence-act of the First. The most important implication of this understanding of causality is that despite the occasionalist critique that we do not and cannot observe a necessary connection between cause and effect, for Ibn Rushd, the moment one defines existence as pure act, it metaphysically makes more sense to accept causal efficacy of entities, for they participate in the pure existence-act of the First. The chapter also examines the differences between Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 and Ibn Rushd that stem from the latter\u2019s efforts to address some of Ghaz\u0101l\u012b\u2019s challenges. Ibn Rushd agrees with Ghaz\u0101l\u012b in that plurality can emanate from the First without emanationist intermediation and solely based on the nature-capacity-form of beings. This view establishes a closer connection between the First\u2019s existence-act and the world than Ibn S\u012bn\u0101\u2019s metaphysics allows.","btype":2,"date":"2020","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781108866965.005","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":25,"category_name":"Neoplatonism","link":"bib?categories[]=Neoplatonism"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":1807,"full_name":"\u00d6zg\u00fcr Koca","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5395,"section_of":5394,"pages":"83\u201399","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5394,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":1,"language":"en","title":"Islam, causality, and freedom: from the medieval to the modern era","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2020","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781108866965","book":{"id":5394,"pubplace":"Cambridge","publisher":"Cambridge University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6252,"entry_id":5394,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"\u00d6zg\u00fcr Koca","free_first_name":"\u00d6zg\u00fcr","free_last_name":"Koca","norm_person":null}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2020]}
| Title | From Alexandria to Cordoba: Medicine according to Averroes and the Araboislamic tradition |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2020 |
| Journal | Asclepio. Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 312-327 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, Avicenna, Medicine |
| Author(s) | Miquel Forcada |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Ibn Rushd consideró la medicina como un arte productivo en su al-Kulliyyāt fī l-ṭibb, escrito entre 1162 y 1169, y como una ciencia en su comentario al poema de Ibn Sīnā sobre la medicina (Sharḥ Urjūzat Ibn Sīnā fī l-ṭibb), escrito en 1180. En Kulliyyāt, Ibn Rushd sigue de manera bastante estricta las ideas sobre el estatus de la medicina del filósofo al-Fārābī. En Sharḥ Urjūzat Ibn Sīnā, Ibn Rushd sintetiza las concepciones de varias obras, entre las cuales Masā’il fī l-ṭibb de Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq y Ḥubaysh, Qānūn fī l-ṭibb de Ibn Sinā y las obras sobre la lógica aristotélica de al-Fārābī. El análisis conjunto de estas fuentes, más las aportaciones de un nuevo manuscrito de Sharḥ Urjūzat Ibn Sīnā, proporcionan una idea más clara de la concepción de la medicina expuesta en esta obra y, en consecuencia, podemos reconsiderar y relativizar la diferencia entre esta concepción y la que se expone en Kulliyyāt. Las ideas de Ibn Rushd sobre el estatus de la medicina se analizan de acuerdo con el contexto sociopolítico en que fueron concebidas, considerando especialmente el hecho de que Sharḥ Urjūza Ibn Sīnā fī l-ṭibb fue escrito para las elites intelectuales y políticas del régimen almohad. Ibn Rushd considered medicine as a productive art in his al-Kulliyyāt fī l-ṭibb, written between 1162 and 1169, and as a science in his commentary on Ibn Sīnā’s poem on the subject (Sharḥ Urjūzat Ibn Sīnā fī l-ṭibb), written in 1180. In Kulliyyāt, Ibn Rushd followed quite strictly the ideas on the status of medicine propounded by the philosopher al-Fārābī. In Sharḥ Urjūzat Ibn Sīnā, Ibn Rushd summarised the conceptions of several works including Ḥunayn ibn Isḥāq’s Masā’il fīl-ṭibb, Ibn Sīnā’s Qānūn fī l-ṭibb and al-Fārābī’s works on Aristotle’s logic. The joint analysis of these sources and the evidence provided by a new manuscript of Ibn Rushd’s Sharḥ give us a clearer idea of the conception of medicine extant in this latter work and, in consequence, we can reconsider and relativise the difference between it and the conception expounded in Kulliyyāt. Ibn Rushd’s ideas on the status of medicine are analysed according to the sociopolitical context in which they were conceived, taking particular account of the fact that Sharḥ Urjūza Ibn Sīnā fī l-ṭibb was written for the intellectual and political elites of the Almohad regime. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5592","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5592,"authors_free":[{"id":6491,"entry_id":5592,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Miquel Forcada","free_first_name":"Miquel","free_last_name":"Forcada","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"From Alexandria to Cordoba: Medicine according to Averroes and the Araboislamic tradition","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"From Alexandria to Cordoba: Medicine according to Averroes and the Araboislamic tradition"},"abstract":" Ibn Rushd consider\u00f3 la medicina como un arte productivo en su al-Kulliyy\u0101t f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb, escrito entre 1162 y 1169, y como una ciencia en su comentario al poema de Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 sobre la medicina (Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bzat Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb), escrito en 1180. En Kulliyy\u0101t, Ibn Rushd sigue de manera bastante estricta las ideas sobre el estatus de la medicina del fil\u00f3sofo al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b. En Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bzat Ibn S\u012bn\u0101, Ibn Rushd sintetiza las concepciones de varias obras, entre las cuales Mas\u0101\u2019il f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb de \u1e24unayn ibn Is\u1e25\u0101q y \u1e24ubaysh, Q\u0101n\u016bn f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb de Ibn Sin\u0101 y las obras sobre la l\u00f3gica aristot\u00e9lica de al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b. El an\u00e1lisis conjunto de estas fuentes, m\u00e1s las aportaciones de un nuevo manuscrito de Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bzat Ibn S\u012bn\u0101, proporcionan una idea m\u00e1s clara de la concepci\u00f3n de la medicina expuesta en esta obra y, en consecuencia, podemos reconsiderar y relativizar la diferencia entre esta concepci\u00f3n y la que se expone en Kulliyy\u0101t. Las ideas de Ibn Rushd sobre el estatus de la medicina se analizan de acuerdo con el contexto sociopol\u00edtico en que fueron concebidas, considerando especialmente el hecho de que Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bza Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb fue escrito para las elites intelectuales y pol\u00edticas del r\u00e9gimen almohad.\r\n\r\nIbn Rushd considered medicine as a productive art in his al-Kulliyy\u0101t f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb, written between 1162 and 1169, and as a science in his commentary on Ibn S\u012bn\u0101\u2019s poem on the subject (Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bzat Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb), written in 1180. In Kulliyy\u0101t, Ibn Rushd followed quite strictly the ideas on the status of medicine propounded by the philosopher al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b. In Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bzat Ibn S\u012bn\u0101, Ibn Rushd summarised the conceptions of several works including \u1e24unayn ibn Is\u1e25\u0101q\u2019s Mas\u0101\u2019il f\u012bl-\u1e6dibb, Ibn S\u012bn\u0101\u2019s Q\u0101n\u016bn f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb and al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b\u2019s works on Aristotle\u2019s logic. The joint analysis of these sources and the evidence provided by a new manuscript of Ibn Rushd\u2019s Shar\u1e25 give us a clearer idea of the conception of medicine extant in this latter work and, in consequence, we can reconsider and relativise the difference between it and the conception expounded in Kulliyy\u0101t. Ibn Rushd\u2019s ideas on the status of \r\nmedicine are analysed according to the sociopolitical context in which they were conceived, taking particular account of the fact that Shar\u1e25 Urj\u016bza Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 f\u012b l-\u1e6dibb was written for the intellectual and political elites of the Almohad regime.","btype":3,"date":"2020","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3989\/asclepio.2020.13","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":29,"category_name":"Medicine","link":"bib?categories[]=Medicine"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5592,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Asclepio. Revista de Historia de la Medicina y de la Ciencia","volume":"72","issue":"2","pages":"312-327"}},"sort":[2020]}
| Title | Aristotle’s Rhetoric and Political Thought in the Christian Orient and in al-Fârâbî, Avicenna and Averroes |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Published in | The Aristotelian Tradition in Syriac |
| Pages | 249–259 |
| Categories | Rhetoric, Politics, al-Fārābī, Avicenna, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | John W. Watt |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Given the remarkable fact that Aristotle’s Rhetoric appears to have had little influence outside the area of logic in late antiquity, but was very influential in Islamic political philosophy, the chapter examines whether the Syriac tradition can help to explain this development. The late antique Platonic concept of philosophical rhetoric, Themistius’ political thought, and their echoes in the Rhetoric of Antony of Tagrit are examined, and compared with the ideas expressed in the writings on rhetoric of al-Fārābī, Avicenna, Averroes, and Bar Hebraeus. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5108","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5108,"authors_free":[{"id":5883,"entry_id":5108,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1719,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"John W. Watt","free_first_name":"John W.","free_last_name":"Watt","norm_person":{"id":1719,"first_name":"John W.","last_name":"Watt","full_name":"John W. Watt","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":" https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/131435531","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=John W. Watt"}}],"entry_title":"Aristotle\u2019s Rhetoric and Political Thought in the Christian Orient and in al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee, Avicenna and Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Aristotle\u2019s Rhetoric and Political Thought in the Christian Orient and in al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee, Avicenna and Averroes"},"abstract":"Given the remarkable fact that Aristotle\u2019s Rhetoric appears to have had little influence outside the area of logic in late antiquity, but was very influential in Islamic political philosophy, the chapter examines whether the Syriac tradition can help to explain this development. The late antique Platonic concept of philosophical rhetoric, Themistius\u2019 political thought, and their echoes in the Rhetoric of Antony of Tagrit are examined, and compared with the ideas expressed in the writings on rhetoric of al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b, Avicenna, Averroes, and Bar Hebraeus.","btype":2,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":48,"category_name":"Rhetoric","link":"bib?categories[]=Rhetoric"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":1719,"full_name":"John W. Watt","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5108,"section_of":5107,"pages":"249\u2013259","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5107,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":1,"language":"en","title":"The Aristotelian Tradition in Syriac","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2019","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"This volume presents a panorama of Syriac engagement with Aristotelian philosophy primarily situated in the 6th to the 9th centuries, but also ranging to the 13th. It offers a wide range of articles, opening with surveys on the most important philosophical writers of the period before providing detailed studies of two Syriac prolegomena to Aristotle's Categories and examining the works of Hunayn, the most famous Arabic translator of the 9th century. Watt also examines the relationships between philosophy, rhetoric and political thought in the period, and explores the connection between earlier Syriac tradition and later Arabic philosophy in the thought of the 13th century Syriac polymath Bar Hebraeus.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4324\/9780429445231","book":{"id":5107,"pubplace":"Abingdon, New York","publisher":"Routledge","series":"Variorum collected studies","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":5882,"entry_id":5107,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"John W. Watt","free_first_name":"John W.","free_last_name":"Watt","norm_person":null}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Comment Averroès a emposonné Avicenne: histoire d'une légende |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2019 |
| Published in | De l'homme, de la nature et du monde: mélanges d'histoire des sciences médiévales offerts à Danielle Jacquart |
| Pages | 37-58 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Joël Chandelier |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5465","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5465,"authors_free":[{"id":6335,"entry_id":5465,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jo\u00ebl Chandelier","free_first_name":"Jo\u00ebl ","free_last_name":"Chandelier","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Comment Averro\u00e8s a emposonn\u00e9 Avicenne: histoire d'une l\u00e9gende","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Comment Averro\u00e8s a emposonn\u00e9 Avicenne: histoire d'une l\u00e9gende"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2019","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5465,"section_of":5464,"pages":"37-58","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5464,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"fr","title":"De l'homme, de la nature et du monde: m\u00e9langes d'histoire des sciences m\u00e9di\u00e9vales offerts \u00e0 Danielle Jacquart","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2019","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"De 1990 \u00e0 2016, Danielle Jacquart, directeur d\u2019\u00e9tudes \u00e0 l\u2019Ecole pratique des hautes \u00e9tudes, \u00e0 la section des Sciences historiques et philologiques, a, dans sa conf\u00e9rence, explor\u00e9 la science et la m\u00e9decine du Moyen Age \u00e0 travers une grande vari\u00e9t\u00e9 de th\u00e8mes qui tr\u00e8s souvent s\u2019interrogeaient sur la fa\u00e7on dont l\u2019homme, corps et \u00e2me, avait \u00e9t\u00e9 au coeur des pr\u00e9occupations intellectuelles et pratiques des savants \u00e0 travers des savoirs mettant en jeu sa place dans la nature et, au-del\u00e0, dans le monde. Ce volume d\u2019hommage r\u00e9unit les contributions d\u2019\u00e9l\u00e8ves et d\u2019amis de ce s\u00e9minaire, donnant un aper\u00e7u de la richesse de cet enseignement. Sp\u00e9cialistes de l\u2019histoire des sciences, de la philosophie ou de la litt\u00e9rature m\u00e9di\u00e9vales, ces derniers \u00e9voquent la transmission de la science grecque et arabe au monde latin, abordent des savoirs scientifiques sp\u00e9cifiques \u2013 math\u00e9matiques et optique, cosmologie et astrologie \u2013, se penchent sur la th\u00e9orie m\u00e9dicale et la philosophie naturelle, s\u2019aventurent dans des domaines sollicitant le discours scientifique \u2013 cuisine, alchimie, r\u00e9flexions litt\u00e9raires \u2013, ou bien cernent le milieu m\u00e9dical dans les cours ou dans les villes.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5464,"pubplace":"Gen\u00e8ve","publisher":"Droz","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6333,"entry_id":5464,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":" Nicolas Weill-Parot ","free_first_name":" Nicolas","free_last_name":" Weill-Parot ","norm_person":null}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | La doctrina general de los trascendentales en Dietrich von Freiberg, y su filiación aristotélico-averroísta |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 659–681 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Metaphysics, Avicenna, Tradition and Reception, Latin Averroism, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Fernanda Ocampo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The Aristotelian text Metaphysics IV, 2, and the interpretations carried out by the Muslim philosophers, i.e., Avicenna and Averroes, constitute the theoretical framework in which several Latin authors of the second half of the 13th century from the University of Paris, who have taken a stance around the question of the ‘real distinction’ between esse and essentia, elaborated their doctrines about transcendentals. According to this, our work seeks to trace the dependence of Dietrich’s general doctrine of the transcendentals, with respect to the theses established by Aristotle in the mentioned text, and in particular, with regard to the Averroist reading – critical of that of Avicenna’s –, which “has made school” in the Parisian environment, especially among the teachers and students of the Faculty of Arts, but also, first, in Thomas Aquinas. Thus, in light of this scenario of readings and interpretations, we will seek to delimit the central features of the Theodorian conception of the communia, pointing out the possible differences or coincidences with respect to the doctrines of these preceding authors. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5060","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5060,"authors_free":[{"id":5813,"entry_id":5060,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fernanda Ocampo","free_first_name":"Fernanda ","free_last_name":"Ocampo","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"La doctrina general de los trascendentales en Dietrich von Freiberg, y su filiaci\u00f3n aristot\u00e9lico-averro\u00edsta","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La doctrina general de los trascendentales en Dietrich von Freiberg, y su filiaci\u00f3n aristot\u00e9lico-averro\u00edsta"},"abstract":"The Aristotelian text Metaphysics IV, 2, and the interpretations carried out by the Muslim philosophers, i.e., Avicenna and Averroes, constitute the theoretical framework in which several Latin authors of the second half of the 13th century from the University of Paris, who have taken a stance around the question of the \u2018real distinction\u2019 between esse and essentia, elaborated their doctrines about transcendentals. According to this, our work seeks to trace the dependence of Dietrich\u2019s general doctrine of the transcendentals, with respect to the theses established by Aristotle in the mentioned text, and in particular, with regard to the Averroist reading \u2013 critical of that of Avicenna\u2019s \u2013, which \u201chas made school\u201d in the Parisian environment, especially among the teachers and students of the Faculty of Arts, but also, first, in Thomas Aquinas. Thus, in light of this scenario of readings and interpretations, we will seek to delimit the central features of the Theodorian conception of the communia, pointing out the possible differences or coincidences with respect to the doctrines of these preceding authors.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.5209\/ashf.63089","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5060,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosof\u00eda","volume":"36","issue":"3","pages":"659\u2013681"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Ibn Sînâ and Ibn Rushd on Essence and Existence: A Critical Analysis |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Ishraq |
| Volume | 9 |
| Pages | 13–22 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Metaphysics, Ontology |
| Author(s) | Ahmad Ahmadi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5064","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5064,"authors_free":[{"id":5820,"entry_id":5064,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ahmad Ahmadi","free_first_name":" Ahmad","free_last_name":"Ahmadi","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn S\u00een\u00e2 and Ibn Rushd on Essence and Existence: A Critical Analysis","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn S\u00een\u00e2 and Ibn Rushd on Essence and Existence: A Critical Analysis"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":65,"category_name":"Ontology","link":"bib?categories[]=Ontology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5064,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ishraq","volume":"9","issue":"","pages":"13\u201322"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Averroes’ Logic |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Published in | Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays |
| Pages | 81–95 |
| Categories | Logic, Avicenna, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Paul Thom |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| A survey of Averroes' logical works, showing how his approach to single terms, propositions, and syllogistic rejects innovations made by Avicenna. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5121","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5121,"authors_free":[{"id":5896,"entry_id":5121,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1341,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Paul Thom","free_first_name":"Paul","free_last_name":"Thom","norm_person":{"id":1341,"first_name":"Paul","last_name":"Thom","full_name":"Paul Thom","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1116452626","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/94862126","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Paul Thom"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes\u2019 Logic","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes\u2019 Logic"},"abstract":"A survey of Averroes' logical works, showing how his approach to single terms, propositions, and syllogistic rejects innovations made by Avicenna.","btype":2,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781316335543.006","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":1341,"full_name":"Paul Thom","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5121,"section_of":4977,"pages":"81\u201395","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":4977,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":1,"language":"en","title":"Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2019","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":4977,"pubplace":"Cambridge","publisher":"Cambridge University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Aristotle’s Rhetoric and Political Thought in the Christian Orient and in al-Fârâbî, Avicenna and Averroes |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Published in | Well Begun is Only Half Done: Tracing Aristotle’s Political Ideas in Medieval Arabic, Syriac, Byzantine, and Jewish Sources |
| Pages | 17–47 |
| Categories | Rhetoric, Politics, al-Fārābī, Avicenna, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | John W. Watt |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| see also the Chapter under the same title in John W. Watt "The Aristotelian Tradition in Syriac". |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5380","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5380,"authors_free":[{"id":6232,"entry_id":5380,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1719,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"John W. Watt","free_first_name":"John W. ","free_last_name":"Watt","norm_person":{"id":1719,"first_name":"John W.","last_name":"Watt","full_name":"John W. Watt","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":" https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/131435531","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=John W. Watt"}}],"entry_title":"Aristotle\u2019s Rhetoric and Political Thought in the Christian Orient and in al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee, Avicenna and Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Aristotle\u2019s Rhetoric and Political Thought in the Christian Orient and in al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee, Avicenna and Averroes"},"abstract":"see also the Chapter under the same title in John W. Watt \"The Aristotelian Tradition in Syriac\".","btype":2,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":48,"category_name":"Rhetoric","link":"bib?categories[]=Rhetoric"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":1719,"full_name":"John W. Watt","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5380,"section_of":5379,"pages":"17\u201347","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5379,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Well Begun is Only Half Done: Tracing Aristotle\u2019s Political Ideas in Medieval Arabic, Syriac, Byzantine, and Jewish Sources","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2011","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5379,"pubplace":"Tempe, Arizona","publisher":"ACMRS (Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies)","series":"Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies; Medieval Confluences Series ","volume":"388 respectively 1","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6231,"entry_id":5379,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Vasileios Syros ","free_first_name":"Vasileios ","free_last_name":"Syros ","norm_person":null}]}},"article":null},"sort":["Aristotle\u2019s Rhetoric and Political Thought in the Christian Orient and in al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee, Avicenna and Averroes"]}
| Title | Autori Arabi e Giudei nell'opera di San Tommaso |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 1960 |
| Journal | Angelicum |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 3/4 |
| Pages | 336-401 |
| Categories | Aquinas, Tradition and Reception, al-Ġazālī, Avicenna, Ibn Bāǧǧa |
| Author(s) | C. Vansteenkiste |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/44621289 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5669","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5669,"authors_free":[{"id":6573,"entry_id":5669,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1858,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"C. Vansteenkiste","free_first_name":"C. ","free_last_name":"Vansteenkiste","norm_person":{"id":1858,"first_name":"Clemens ","last_name":"Vansteenkiste","full_name":"Clemens Vansteenkiste","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/141544864","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Clemens Vansteenkiste"}}],"entry_title":"Autori Arabi e Giudei nell'opera di San Tommaso","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Autori Arabi e Giudei nell'opera di San Tommaso"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1960","language":"Italian","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/44621289","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":17,"category_name":"Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a","link":"bib?categories[]=Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a"}],"authors":[{"id":1858,"full_name":"Clemens Vansteenkiste","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5669,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Angelicum","volume":"37","issue":" 3\/4","pages":"336-401"}},"sort":["Autori Arabi e Giudei nell'opera di San Tommaso"]}
| Title | Averroes against Avicenna on Human Spontaneous Generation: The Starting-Point of a Lasting Debate |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2013 |
| Published in | Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe |
| Pages | 37–54 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Commentary, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Amos Bertolacci |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The first criticism of Avicenna in Averroes’s Long Commentary on Metaphysica (II, 993a30-995a20) regards Avicenna’s doctrine of the asexual (so-called ‘spontaneous’) generation of human beings. This criticism is interesting in two main regards. When considered in the general historical context of the confrontation between advocates and opponents of spontaneous generation, the specific debate between Averroes and Avicenna on this issue can be said to have had a long-lasting impact on Latin philosophy up until the Renaissance. Doctrinally, the criticism in question can be taken as a paradigm of Averroes’s more general anti-Avicennian polemic and of the ideological reasons of his dissent towards his illustrious predecessor. In fact, the criticism in questions displays three leitmotivs of Averroes’s dissent towards Avicenna: the harsh tone and the ad personam character of the attack, stressing an error unworthy of Avicenna’s alleged fame in philosophy; the insistence on Avicenna’s agreement and consonance with contemporary thinkers, a fact that in Averroes’s eyes evidences the profound gap separating Avicenna from the ancient masters, depositaries of authentic philosophy; the reproach addressed to Avicenna of being too conversant with, and receptive of, Islamic theology, thus disregarding the requirements of true philosophy. The article shows that in each of these three respects Averroes in fact presents Avicenna’s position in a biased way: indeed Avicenna does not uphold the specific version of human spontaneous generation that Averroes ascribes to him; his doctrine of human spontaneous generation is deeply rooted in ancient philosophy; and his account of this doctrine evidences clear non-religious (and therefore non-theological) traits. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1741","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1741,"authors_free":[{"id":2008,"entry_id":1741,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":815,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Amos Bertolacci","free_first_name":"Amos","free_last_name":"Bertolacci","norm_person":{"id":815,"first_name":"Amos","last_name":"Bertolacci","full_name":"Amos Bertolacci","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/156504006","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61846437","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Amos Bertolacci"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes against Avicenna on Human Spontaneous Generation: The Starting-Point of a Lasting Debate","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes against Avicenna on Human Spontaneous Generation: The Starting-Point of a Lasting Debate"},"abstract":"The first criticism of Avicenna in Averroes\u2019s Long Commentary on Metaphysica (II, 993a30-995a20) regards Avicenna\u2019s doctrine of the asexual (so-called \u2018spontaneous\u2019) generation of human beings. This criticism is interesting in two main regards. When considered in the general historical context of the confrontation between advocates and opponents of spontaneous generation, the specific debate between Averroes and Avicenna on this issue can be said to have had a long-lasting impact on Latin philosophy up until the Renaissance. Doctrinally, the criticism in question can be taken as a paradigm of Averroes\u2019s more general anti-Avicennian polemic and of the ideological reasons of his dissent towards his illustrious predecessor. In fact, the criticism in questions displays three leitmotivs of Averroes\u2019s dissent towards Avicenna: the harsh tone and the ad personam character of the attack, stressing an error unworthy of Avicenna\u2019s alleged fame in philosophy; the insistence on Avicenna\u2019s agreement and consonance with contemporary thinkers, a fact that in Averroes\u2019s eyes evidences the profound gap separating Avicenna from the ancient masters, depositaries of authentic philosophy; the reproach addressed to Avicenna of being too conversant with, and receptive of, Islamic theology, thus disregarding the requirements of true philosophy. The article shows that in each of these three respects Averroes in fact presents Avicenna\u2019s position in a biased way: indeed Avicenna does not uphold the specific version of human spontaneous generation that Averroes ascribes to him; his doctrine of human spontaneous generation is deeply rooted in ancient philosophy; and his account of this doctrine evidences clear non-religious (and therefore non-theological) traits.","btype":2,"date":"2013","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1007\/978-94-007-5240-5_2","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":815,"full_name":"Amos Bertolacci","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1741,"section_of":241,"pages":"37\u201354","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":241,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Renaissance Averroism and Its Aftermath: Arabic Philosophy in Early Modern Europe","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2013","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2013","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":241,"pubplace":"London","publisher":"Springer","series":"International Archives of the History of Ideas","volume":"211","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Averroes against Avicenna on Human Spontaneous Generation: The Starting-Point of a Lasting Debate"]}
| Title | Averroes and the ‘Internal Senses’ |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Published in | Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays |
| Pages | 138–157 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Natural Philosophy, Psychology |
| Author(s) | Rotraud Hansberger |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| An exploration of Averroes' theory of the internal senses as this emerges from his commentary on the Parva Naturalia. He seeks to resist Avicenna's innovations in psychology on this topic, and return to what he sees as a more authentically Aristotelian position, a task complicated by the fact that he is using a version of the Parva Naturalia that was markedly different from the original Greek text. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5120","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5120,"authors_free":[{"id":5895,"entry_id":5120,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rotraud Hansberger","free_first_name":"Rotraud","free_last_name":"Hansberger","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Averroes and the \u2018Internal Senses\u2019","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and the \u2018Internal Senses\u2019"},"abstract":"An exploration of Averroes' theory of the internal senses as this emerges from his commentary on the Parva Naturalia. He seeks to resist Avicenna's innovations in psychology on this topic, and return to what he sees as a more authentically Aristotelian position, a task complicated by the fact that he is using a version of the Parva Naturalia that was markedly different from the original Greek text.","btype":2,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781316335543.009","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5120,"section_of":4977,"pages":"138\u2013157","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":4977,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":1,"language":"en","title":"Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2019","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":4977,"pubplace":"Cambridge","publisher":"Cambridge University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Averroes and the \u2018Internal Senses\u2019"]}
| Title | Averroes on intellect: from Aristotelian origins to Aquinas' critique |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Publication Place | Oxford |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press |
| Categories | Aristotle, Thomas, Avicenna, De anima, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Stephen R. Ogden |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This book on the Muslim philosopher Averroes (Ibn Rushd) provides a detailed analysis of his (in)famous unicity thesis—the view that there is only one separate and eternal intellect for all human beings. It focuses directly on Averroes’ arguments, both from the text of Aristotle’s De Anima and, more importantly, his own philosophical arguments in the Long Commentary on the De Anima. Ogden defends Averroes’ interpretation of Aristotle’s DA III.4–5 (using Greek, Arabic, Latin, and contemporary sources). Yet, the author insists that Averroes is not merely a “commentator” but also an incisive philosopher in his own right. Ogden thus reconstructs and analyzes Averroes’ two most significant independent philosophical arguments, the Determinate Particular Argument and the Unity Argument. Alternative ancient and medieval views are considered throughout, especially from two important foils before and after Averroes, namely Avicenna (Ibn Sīnā) and Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas’s most famous and penetrating arguments against the unicity thesis are also addressed. Finally, Ogden considers Averroes’ own objections to broader metaphysical views of the soul such as Avicenna’s and Aquinas’s, which agree with him on several key points (e.g., the immateriality of the intellect and the individuation of human souls by matter), while still diverging on the number and substantial nature of the intellect. The central aim of the book is to provide readers a single study of Averroes’ most pivotal arguments on intellect, consolidating and building on recent scholarship and offering a comprehensive case for his unicity thesis in the wider context of Aristotelian epistemology and metaphysics. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5293","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5293,"authors_free":[{"id":6112,"entry_id":5293,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1681,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Stephen R. Ogden","free_first_name":"Stephen R.","free_last_name":"Ogden","norm_person":{"id":1681,"first_name":"Stephen R. ","last_name":"Ogden","full_name":"Stephen R. Ogden","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Stephen R. Ogden"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes on intellect: from Aristotelian origins to Aquinas' critique","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes on intellect: from Aristotelian origins to Aquinas' critique"},"abstract":"This book on the Muslim philosopher Averroes (Ibn Rushd) provides a detailed analysis of his (in)famous unicity thesis\u2014the view that there is only one separate and eternal intellect for all human beings. It focuses directly on Averroes\u2019 arguments, both from the text of Aristotle\u2019s De Anima and, more importantly, his own philosophical arguments in the Long Commentary on the De Anima. Ogden defends Averroes\u2019 interpretation of Aristotle\u2019s DA III.4\u20135 (using Greek, Arabic, Latin, and contemporary sources). Yet, the author insists that Averroes is not merely a \u201ccommentator\u201d but also an incisive philosopher in his own right. Ogden thus reconstructs and analyzes Averroes\u2019 two most significant independent philosophical arguments, the Determinate Particular Argument and the Unity Argument. Alternative ancient and medieval views are considered throughout, especially from two important foils before and after Averroes, namely Avicenna (Ibn S\u012bn\u0101) and Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas\u2019s most famous and penetrating arguments against the unicity thesis are also addressed. Finally, Ogden considers Averroes\u2019 own objections to broader metaphysical views of the soul such as Avicenna\u2019s and Aquinas\u2019s, which agree with him on several key points (e.g., the immateriality of the intellect and the individuation of human souls by matter), while still diverging on the number and substantial nature of the intellect. The central aim of the book is to provide readers a single study of Averroes\u2019 most pivotal arguments on intellect, consolidating and building on recent scholarship and offering a comprehensive case for his unicity thesis in the wider context of Aristotelian epistemology and metaphysics.","btype":1,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1093\/oso\/9780192896117.001.0001","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1681,"full_name":"Stephen R. Ogden","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5293,"pubplace":"Oxford ","publisher":"Oxford University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Averroes on intellect: from Aristotelian origins to Aquinas' critique"]}
| Title | Averroes vs. Avicenna on Being |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1974 |
| Journal | The New Scholasticism |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 185–218 |
| Categories | Avicenna |
| Author(s) | Francis A. Cunningham |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1726","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1726,"authors_free":[{"id":1991,"entry_id":1726,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1468,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Francis A. Cunningham","free_first_name":"Francis A.","free_last_name":"Cunningham","norm_person":{"id":1468,"first_name":"Francis A.","last_name":"Cunningham","full_name":"Francis A. Cunningham","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/175195862","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/4969711","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Francis A. Cunningham"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes vs. Avicenna on Being","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes vs. Avicenna on Being"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1974","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[{"id":1468,"full_name":"Francis A. Cunningham","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1726,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The New Scholasticism","volume":"48","issue":"2","pages":"185\u2013218"}},"sort":["Averroes vs. Avicenna on Being"]}
| Title | Averroes, y la crítica de Avicena |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2003 |
| Journal | Revista española de filosofía medieval. Miscellanea Mediaevalia en honor de Joaquin Lomba Fuentes |
| Volume | 10 |
| Pages | 127–138 |
| Categories | Avicenna |
| Author(s) | Josep Puig Montada |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In his refutation of the philosophers, the Muslim theologian Al-Ghazzâlî argues for the incoherency of their doctrines on divine causality, and focuses his attacks on Avicenna’s doctrine of the distinction between being necessary by itself and being possible by itself, but necessary because of another. When Averroes refutes, on his turn, Al-Ghazzâlî’s work, he often points out that the doctrine refuted by al-Ghazzâlî belongs to Avicenna, not to Aristotle, and distances himself from the former. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1718","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1718,"authors_free":[{"id":1983,"entry_id":1718,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":343,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Josep Puig Montada","free_first_name":"Josep","free_last_name":"Puig Montada","norm_person":{"id":343,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Josep Puig Montada","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/188325034","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61625512","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Josep Puig Montada"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes, y la cr\u00edtica de Avicena","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes, y la cr\u00edtica de Avicena"},"abstract":"In his refutation of the philosophers, the Muslim theologian Al-Ghazz\u00e2l\u00ee argues for the incoherency of their doctrines on divine causality, and focuses his attacks on Avicenna\u2019s doctrine of the distinction between being necessary by itself and being possible by itself, but necessary because of another. When Averroes refutes, on his turn, Al-Ghazz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019s work, he often points out that the doctrine refuted by al-Ghazz\u00e2l\u00ee belongs to Avicenna, not to Aristotle, and distances himself from the former.","btype":3,"date":"2003","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[{"id":343,"full_name":"Josep Puig Montada","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1718,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revista espa\u00f1ola de filosof\u00eda medieval. Miscellanea Mediaevalia en honor de Joaquin Lomba Fuentes","volume":"10","issue":null,"pages":"127\u2013138"}},"sort":["Averroes, y la cr\u00edtica de Avicena"]}
| Title | Averroes’ Logic |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Published in | Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays |
| Pages | 81–95 |
| Categories | Logic, Avicenna, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Paul Thom |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| A survey of Averroes' logical works, showing how his approach to single terms, propositions, and syllogistic rejects innovations made by Avicenna. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5121","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5121,"authors_free":[{"id":5896,"entry_id":5121,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1341,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Paul Thom","free_first_name":"Paul","free_last_name":"Thom","norm_person":{"id":1341,"first_name":"Paul","last_name":"Thom","full_name":"Paul Thom","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1116452626","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/94862126","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Paul Thom"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes\u2019 Logic","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes\u2019 Logic"},"abstract":"A survey of Averroes' logical works, showing how his approach to single terms, propositions, and syllogistic rejects innovations made by Avicenna.","btype":2,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781316335543.006","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":1341,"full_name":"Paul Thom","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5121,"section_of":4977,"pages":"81\u201395","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":4977,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":1,"language":"en","title":"Interpreting Averroes. Critical Essays","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2019","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":4977,"pubplace":"Cambridge","publisher":"Cambridge University Press","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Averroes\u2019 Logic"]}
| Title | Avicenna and Averroes on the Proof of God's Existence and the Subject-Matter of Metaphysics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2007 |
| Journal | Medioevo. Rivista di storia della filosofia medievale |
| Volume | 32 |
| Pages | 61–79 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Amos Bertolacci |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1389","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1389,"authors_free":[{"id":1581,"entry_id":1389,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":815,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Amos Bertolacci","free_first_name":"Amos","free_last_name":"Bertolacci","norm_person":{"id":815,"first_name":"Amos","last_name":"Bertolacci","full_name":"Amos Bertolacci","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/156504006","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61846437","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Amos Bertolacci"}}],"entry_title":"Avicenna and Averroes on the Proof of God's Existence and the Subject-Matter of Metaphysics","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Avicenna and Averroes on the Proof of God's Existence and the Subject-Matter of Metaphysics"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2007","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":815,"full_name":"Amos Bertolacci","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1389,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Medioevo. Rivista di storia della filosofia medievale","volume":"32","issue":null,"pages":"61\u201379"}},"sort":["Avicenna and Averroes on the Proof of God's Existence and the Subject-Matter of Metaphysics"]}
| Title | Avicenna and Averroes. Modality and Theology |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2001 |
| Published in | Potentialität und Possibilität. Modalaussagen in der Geschichte der Metaphysik |
| Pages | 125–145 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Logic, Avicenna |
| Author(s) | Allan Bäck |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1412","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1412,"authors_free":[{"id":1606,"entry_id":1412,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":813,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Allan B\u00e4ck","free_first_name":"Allan","free_last_name":"B\u00e4ck","norm_person":{"id":813,"first_name":"Allan","last_name":"B\u00e4ck","full_name":"Allan B\u00e4ck","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/172984157","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61663161","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Allan B\u00e4ck"}}],"entry_title":"Avicenna and Averroes. Modality and Theology","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Avicenna and Averroes. Modality and Theology"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2001","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[{"id":813,"full_name":"Allan B\u00e4ck","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1412,"section_of":183,"pages":"125\u2013145","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":183,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Potentialit\u00e4t und Possibilit\u00e4t. Modalaussagen in der Geschichte der Metaphysik","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2001","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2001","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":183,"pubplace":"Stuttgart","publisher":"Frommann-Holzboog","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Avicenna and Averroes. Modality and Theology"]}