| Title | Discussion of Causality Based on the Conceptions of Nature of Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazalī |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2010 |
| Journal | Ilahiyat Studies. A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 241–258 |
| Categories | Natural Philosophy, al-Ġazālī, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Mehmet Fatih Birgül |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In this short analysis, we will compare Ibn Rushd's justification of the causality principle to the suspicions and objections of al-Ghazālī. Nevertheless, our analysis of the issue will center on al-Ghazālī's and Ibn Rushd's conceptions of nature. Therefore, our article aims at illuminating two points: first, there is a fundamental difference between the conceptions of nature and generation of the two philosophers; second, this structural difference constitutes the real cause of disagreement over the causality principle. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1636","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1636,"authors_free":[{"id":1892,"entry_id":1636,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1425,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl","free_first_name":"Mehmet","free_last_name":"Fatih Birg\u00fcl","norm_person":{"id":1425,"first_name":"Mehmet","last_name":"Fatih Birg\u00fcl","full_name":"Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/101480661","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl"}}],"entry_title":"Discussion of Causality Based on the Conceptions of Nature of Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazal\u012b","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Discussion of Causality Based on the Conceptions of Nature of Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazal\u012b"},"abstract":"In this short analysis, we will compare Ibn Rushd's justification of the causality principle to the suspicions and objections of al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b. Nevertheless, our analysis of the issue will center on al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b's and Ibn Rushd's conceptions of nature. Therefore, our article aims at illuminating two points: first, there is a fundamental difference between the conceptions of nature and generation of the two philosophers; second, this structural difference constitutes the real cause of disagreement over the causality principle.","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.12730\/13091719.2010.12 (refers to the whole issue of the magazine)","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1425,"full_name":"Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1636,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ilahiyat Studies. A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies","volume":"1","issue":"2","pages":"241\u2013258"}},"sort":[2010]}
| Title | On Aristotle's "Metaphysics". An annotated Translation of the So-called "Epitome" |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2010 |
| Publication Place | Berlin, New York |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter |
| Series | Scientia Graeco-Arabica |
| Volume | 5 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Averroes |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1434","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1434,"authors_free":[{"id":1632,"entry_id":1434,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":null,"free_last_name":null,"norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}}],"entry_title":"On Aristotle's \"Metaphysics\". An annotated Translation of the So-called \"Epitome\"","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"On Aristotle's \"Metaphysics\". An annotated Translation of the So-called \"Epitome\""},"abstract":null,"btype":1,"date":"2010","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":1434,"pubplace":"Berlin, New York","publisher":"Walter de Gruyter","series":"Scientia Graeco-Arabica","volume":"5","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2010]}
| Title | The Revisions of Qalonymos ben Qalonymos's Medieval Hebrew Version of Averroes's Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2010 |
| Journal | Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
| Volume | 21 |
| Pages | 457–473 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Transmission |
| Author(s) | Mauro Zonta |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Qalonymos ben Qalonymos of Arles (b. 1286 - d. after 1329) translated from Arabic into hebrew, among the others, Averroes's Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics. As tentatively suggested here, this translation, made in 1317, full of lacunas and yet unpublished, was apparently revised thrice: 1. around 1330, possibly by a relative of Qalonymos ben Qalonymos, Qalonymos ben David Todrosi; 2. after 1330 c. and before 1346, maybe by Qalonymos ben Qalonymos himself; 3. after 1330 c. and before 1438, by a still anonymous, possibly Italian, Jewish author. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1438","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1438,"authors_free":[{"id":1636,"entry_id":1438,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":401,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mauro Zonta","free_first_name":"Mauro","free_last_name":"Zonta","norm_person":{"id":401,"first_name":"Mauro","last_name":"Zonta","full_name":"Mauro Zonta","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1068186860","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51773741","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mauro Zonta"}}],"entry_title":"The Revisions of Qalonymos ben Qalonymos's Medieval Hebrew Version of Averroes's Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"The Revisions of Qalonymos ben Qalonymos's Medieval Hebrew Version of Averroes's Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics"},"abstract":"Qalonymos ben Qalonymos of Arles (b. 1286 - d. after 1329) translated from Arabic into hebrew, among the others, Averroes's Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics. As tentatively suggested here, this translation, made in 1317, full of lacunas and yet unpublished, was apparently revised thrice: 1. around 1330, possibly by a relative of Qalonymos ben Qalonymos, Qalonymos ben David Todrosi; 2. after 1330 c. and before 1346, maybe by Qalonymos ben Qalonymos himself; 3. after 1330 c. and before 1438, by a still anonymous, possibly Italian, Jewish author.","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"}],"authors":[{"id":401,"full_name":"Mauro Zonta","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1438,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"21","issue":null,"pages":"457\u2013473"}},"sort":[2010]}
| Title | Who is the God of the Qur'an?. A Medieval Islamic Debate and Contemporary Philosophy of Religion |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2010 |
| Published in | Classic Issues in Islamic Philosophy and Theology Today |
| Pages | 91–109 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Theology |
| Author(s) | Chryssi Sidiropoulou |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1457","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1457,"authors_free":[{"id":1659,"entry_id":1457,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1323,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Chryssi Sidiropoulou","free_first_name":"Chryssi","free_last_name":"Sidiropoulou","norm_person":{"id":1323,"first_name":"Chryssi","last_name":"Sidiropoulou","full_name":"Chryssi Sidiropoulou","short_ident":"ChrSid","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Chryssi Sidiropoulou"}}],"entry_title":"Who is the God of the Qur'an?. A Medieval Islamic Debate and Contemporary Philosophy of Religion","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Who is the God of the Qur'an?. A Medieval Islamic Debate and Contemporary Philosophy of Religion"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2010","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1323,"full_name":"Chryssi Sidiropoulou","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1457,"section_of":201,"pages":"91\u2013109","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":201,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Classic Issues in Islamic Philosophy and Theology Today","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2010","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2010","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":201,"pubplace":"Dordrecht-Heidelberg-London-New York","publisher":"Springer","series":"Islamic Philosophy and Occidental Phenomenology in Dialogue","volume":"4","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2010]}
| Title | Yaḥyá ibn ʿAdī and Averroes on Metaphysics Alpha Elatton |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2010 |
| Journal | Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
| Volume | 21 |
| Pages | 343–374 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Peter Adamson |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This paper examines and compares two commentaries on Aristotle Metaphyics, Alpha Elatton. In the Arabic tradition this was considered to be the first book of the Metaphysics, and it accordingly acquired more importance than it is usually given today. After giving a brief resume of Elatton and its transmission into Arabic, the paper discusses the commentaries of Yaḥyá ibn ʿAdī, a Christian commentator of the Baghdad School, and by Averroes. it is argued that these two commentaries show rather different conceptions of Elatton as a text, and metaphysics as a science. In the final section Averroes' commentary on Elatton is shown to resonate strongly with Averroes' famous Decisive Treatise. Concluding remarks consider the question of how Averroes' project as a commentator related to that of the Baghdad School. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1537","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1537,"authors_free":[{"id":1764,"entry_id":1537,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":905,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Peter Adamson","free_first_name":"Peter","free_last_name":"Adamson","norm_person":{"id":905,"first_name":"Peter","last_name":"Adamson","full_name":"Peter Adamson","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139896104","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29826916","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Peter Adamson"}}],"entry_title":"Ya\u1e25y\u00e1 ibn \u02bfAd\u012b and Averroes on Metaphysics Alpha Elatton","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ya\u1e25y\u00e1 ibn \u02bfAd\u012b and Averroes on Metaphysics Alpha Elatton"},"abstract":"This paper examines and compares two commentaries on Aristotle Metaphyics, Alpha Elatton. In the Arabic tradition this was considered to be the first book of the Metaphysics, and it accordingly acquired more importance than it is usually given today. After giving a brief resume of Elatton and its transmission into Arabic, the paper discusses the commentaries of Ya\u1e25y\u00e1 ibn \u02bfAd\u012b, a Christian commentator of the Baghdad School, and by Averroes. it is argued that these two commentaries show rather different conceptions of Elatton as a text, and metaphysics as a science. In the final section Averroes' commentary on Elatton is shown to resonate strongly with Averroes' famous Decisive Treatise. Concluding remarks consider the question of how Averroes' project as a commentator related to that of the Baghdad School.","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":905,"full_name":"Peter Adamson","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1537,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"21","issue":null,"pages":"343\u2013374"}},"sort":[2010]}
| Title | Ibn Rušd on the Structure of Aristotle's Metaphysics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2010 |
| Journal | Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
| Volume | 21 |
| Pages | 375–410 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias |
| Author(s) | Rüdiger Arnzen |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The structure of Aristotle's Metaphysics was a matter of dispute among ancient and Medieval Greek, Arabic, and Latin-writing commentators. The present article investigates the question in which way the Arab philosopher Averroes dealt with this problem in his so-called Epitome and his literal commentary on the Metaphysics. It tries to show that in the Epitome Averroes restructured the contents of the Metaphysics according to his own conception of this discipline, and that this conception was partly indebted to his own main sources, al-Fārābī and Ibn Sīnā, partly independent from these. Furthemore, the article examines whether and, if so, in which whay Averroes changed his mind about metaphysics as such and/or the structure of Aristotle's Metaphysics in his late literal commentary. It is argued that Averroes discarded there some of his earlier Avicennian positions in favour of a certain rapprochement to positions held by Alexander of Aphrodisias, but never gave up in general his overall conception of the Metaphysics as displayed in the Epitome. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1538","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1538,"authors_free":[{"id":1765,"entry_id":1538,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":535,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"R\u00fcdiger Arnzen","free_first_name":"R\u00fcdiger","free_last_name":"Arnzen","norm_person":{"id":535,"first_name":"R\u00fcdiger","last_name":"Arnzen","full_name":"R\u00fcdiger Arnzen","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/115210423","viaf_url":"NULL","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=R\u00fcdiger Arnzen"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d on the Structure of Aristotle's Metaphysics","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d on the Structure of Aristotle's Metaphysics"},"abstract":"The structure of Aristotle's Metaphysics was a matter of dispute among ancient and Medieval Greek, Arabic, and Latin-writing commentators. The present article investigates the question in which way the Arab philosopher Averroes dealt with this problem in his so-called Epitome and his literal commentary on the Metaphysics. It tries to show that in the Epitome Averroes restructured the contents of the Metaphysics according to his own conception of this discipline, and that this conception was partly indebted to his own main sources, al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b and Ibn S\u012bn\u0101, partly independent from these. Furthemore, the article examines whether and, if so, in which whay Averroes changed his mind about metaphysics as such and\/or the structure of Aristotle's Metaphysics in his late literal commentary. It is argued that Averroes discarded there some of his earlier Avicennian positions in favour of a certain rapprochement to positions held by Alexander of Aphrodisias, but never gave up in general his overall conception of the Metaphysics as displayed in the Epitome.","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"}],"authors":[{"id":535,"full_name":"R\u00fcdiger Arnzen","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1538,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"21","issue":null,"pages":"375\u2013410"}},"sort":[2010]}
| Title | Intentionality in Medieval Arabic Philosophy |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2010 |
| Journal | Quaestio |
| Volume | 10 |
| Pages | 65-81 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Psychology, Metaphysics, Linguistics |
| Author(s) | Deborah L. Black |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| It has long been a truism of the history of philosophy that intentionality is an invention of the medieval period, and within this standard narrative, the central place of Arabic philosophy has always been acknowledged. Yet there are many misconceptions surrounding the theories of intentionality advanced by the two main Arabic thinkers whose works were available to the West, Avicenna and Averroes. In the first part of this paper I offer an overview of the general accounts of intentionality and intentional being found in the linguistic, psychological, and metaphysical writings of Avicenna and Averroes, and I trace the terminology of “intentions” to a neglected passage from Avicenna’s logic. In the second part of the paper I examine the way that Avicenna and Averroes apply their general theories of intentionality to the realm of sense perception. I offer an explanation of why Avicenna might have chosen to denominate the objects of the internal sense faculty of estimation as “intentions”, and I explore the implications of Averroes’s decision to attribute intentionality to the external senses and the media of perception. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5336","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5336,"authors_free":[{"id":6182,"entry_id":5336,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":950,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Deborah L. Black","free_first_name":"Deborah L.","free_last_name":"Black","norm_person":{"id":950,"first_name":"Deborah Louise","last_name":"Black","full_name":"Deborah Louise Black","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1061153703","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/12971847","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Deborah Louise Black"}}],"entry_title":"Intentionality in Medieval Arabic Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Intentionality in Medieval Arabic Philosophy"},"abstract":"It has long been a truism of the history of philosophy that intentionality is an invention of the medieval period, and within this standard narrative, the central place of Arabic philosophy has always been acknowledged. Yet there are many misconceptions surrounding the theories of intentionality advanced by the two main Arabic thinkers whose works were available to the West, Avicenna and Averroes. In the first part of this paper I offer an overview of the general accounts of intentionality and intentional being found in the linguistic, psychological, and metaphysical writings of Avicenna and Averroes, and I trace the terminology of \u201cintentions\u201d to a neglected passage from Avicenna\u2019s logic. In the second part of the paper I examine the way that Avicenna and Averroes apply their general theories of intentionality to the realm of sense perception. I offer an explanation of why Avicenna might have chosen to denominate the objects of the internal sense faculty of estimation as \u201cintentions\u201d, and I explore the implications of Averroes\u2019s decision to attribute intentionality to the external senses and the media of perception.","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1484\/J.QUAESTIO.1.102326","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":78,"category_name":"Linguistics","link":"bib?categories[]=Linguistics"}],"authors":[{"id":950,"full_name":"Deborah Louise Black","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5336,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Quaestio","volume":" 10","issue":"","pages":"65-81"}},"sort":[2010]}
| Title | The Reception of Averroes' Long Commentary on the Metaphysics in Latin Medieval Philosophy until Albertus Magnus |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2009 |
| Published in | Via Alberti. Texte - Quellen - Interpretationen |
| Pages | 457–480 |
| Categories | Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Amos Bertolacci |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1360","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1360,"authors_free":[{"id":1548,"entry_id":1360,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":815,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Amos Bertolacci","free_first_name":"Amos","free_last_name":"Bertolacci","norm_person":{"id":815,"first_name":"Amos","last_name":"Bertolacci","full_name":"Amos Bertolacci","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/156504006","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61846437","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Amos Bertolacci"}}],"entry_title":"The Reception of Averroes' Long Commentary on the Metaphysics in Latin Medieval Philosophy until Albertus Magnus","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"The Reception of Averroes' Long Commentary on the Metaphysics in Latin Medieval Philosophy until Albertus Magnus"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2009","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":815,"full_name":"Amos Bertolacci","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1360,"section_of":168,"pages":"457\u2013480","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":168,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Via Alberti. Texte - Quellen - Interpretationen","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2009","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2009","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":168,"pubplace":"M\u00fcnster","publisher":"Aschendorff","series":"Subsidia Albertina","volume":"2","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2009]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd/Averroes and "Islamic" Rationalism |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2009 |
| Journal | Medieval EncountersAl-Andalus, Sepharad and Medievela Iberia. Cultural Contact and Diffusion |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 225–235 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Theology |
| Author(s) | Richard C. Taylor |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The classical rationalist philosophical tradition in Arabic reached its culmination in the writings of the twelfth-century Andalusian Averroes whose translated commentaries on Aristotle conveyed to the Latin West a rationalist approach which significantly challenged and affected theological and philosophical thinking in that Christian context. That methodology is shown at work in his Fasl al-Maqāl or Book of the Distinction of Discourse and the Establishment of the Relation of Religious Law and Philosophy (c. 1280), although the deeply philosophical character of his subtle arguments has gone largely unappreciated. Here the philosophical foundations for his reasoning are exposed to reveal key elements of his rationalism. That approach is confirmed in his assertion in his later Long Commentary on the Metaphysics (c. 1290) that the highest worship of God is to be found first and foremost in the philosophical science of metaphysics rather than in the rituals of religion. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1370","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1370,"authors_free":[{"id":1562,"entry_id":1370,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":966,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Richard C. Taylor","free_first_name":"Richard C.","free_last_name":"Taylor","norm_person":{"id":966,"first_name":"Richard C.","last_name":"Taylor","full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139866353","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/49247370","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Richard C. Taylor"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd\/Averroes and \"Islamic\" Rationalism","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd\/Averroes and \"Islamic\" Rationalism"},"abstract":"The classical rationalist philosophical tradition in Arabic reached its culmination in the writings of the twelfth-century Andalusian Averroes whose translated commentaries on Aristotle conveyed to the Latin West a rationalist approach which significantly challenged and affected theological and philosophical thinking in that Christian context. That methodology is shown at work in his Fasl al-Maq\u0101l or Book of the Distinction of Discourse and the Establishment of the Relation of Religious Law and Philosophy (c. 1280), although the deeply philosophical character of his subtle arguments has gone largely unappreciated. Here the philosophical foundations for his reasoning are exposed to reveal key elements of his rationalism. That approach is confirmed in his assertion in his later Long Commentary on the Metaphysics (c. 1290) that the highest worship of God is to be found first and foremost in the philosophical science of metaphysics rather than in the rituals of religion. ","btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":966,"full_name":"Richard C. Taylor","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1370,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Medieval EncountersAl-Andalus, Sepharad and Medievela Iberia. Cultural Contact and Diffusion","volume":"15","issue":"2","pages":"225\u2013235"}},"sort":[2009]}
| Title | Esencia y existencia en Avicenna y Averroes |
| Translation | Essence and Existence in Avicenna and Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2009 |
| Journal | Al-Qanṭara |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 403–426 |
| Categories | Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Catarina Belo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article explores the views on existence of medieval Muslim philosophers Avicenna (d. 1037) and Averroes (d. 1198), whose works followed closely the philosophy of Aristotle. In addition to the Aristotelian influence, which permeated all medieval Islamic philosophy, Avicenna and Averroes were also inspired by Islamic theology, known in Arabic as kalām. The distinction between essence and existence is one of the most central and controversial aspects of Avicenna's philosophy, together with his claim that existence is an accident. Averroes in turn has a radically different conception of existence, identifying it with existing beings rather than considering it as something in itself. With the Latin translation of Avicenna's metaphysical works in the 12th century, the Avicennian distinction went on to shape much of the debate on existence in medieval Scholastic philosophy and beyond. This article assesses the meaning of the distinction in Avicenna as well as Averroes' criticism. In explicating their radically different views on existence, it also touches on later discussions concerning existence, for example the issue whether existence is a predicate, in the Modern Age. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1379","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1379,"authors_free":[{"id":1571,"entry_id":1379,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1254,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Catarina Belo","free_first_name":"Catarina","free_last_name":"Belo","norm_person":{"id":1254,"first_name":"Catarina","last_name":"Belo","full_name":"Catarina Belo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132895374","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Catarina Belo"}}],"entry_title":"Esencia y existencia en Avicenna y Averroes","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":"Essence and Existence in Avicenna and Averroes","main_title":{"title":"Esencia y existencia en Avicenna y Averroes"},"abstract":"This article explores the views on existence of medieval Muslim philosophers Avicenna (d. 1037) and Averroes (d. 1198), whose works followed closely the philosophy of Aristotle. In addition to the Aristotelian influence, which permeated all medieval Islamic philosophy, Avicenna and Averroes were also inspired by Islamic theology, known in Arabic as kal\u0101m. The distinction between essence and existence is one of the most central and controversial aspects of Avicenna's philosophy, together with his claim that existence is an accident. Averroes in turn has a radically different conception of existence, identifying it with existing beings rather than considering it as something in itself. With the Latin translation of Avicenna's metaphysical works in the 12th century, the Avicennian distinction went on to shape much of the debate on existence in medieval Scholastic philosophy and beyond. This article assesses the meaning of the distinction in Avicenna as well as Averroes' criticism. In explicating their radically different views on existence, it also touches on later discussions concerning existence, for example the issue whether existence is a predicate, in the Modern Age.","btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1254,"full_name":"Catarina Belo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1379,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Qan\u1e6dara","volume":"30","issue":"2","pages":"403\u2013426"}},"sort":[2009]}
| Title | Metaphysics Last: Agostino on Averroes, Avicenna, and the Order of the Theoretical Sciences |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Published in | Averroism between the 15th and 17th Century |
| Pages | 151–187 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Avicenna, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Anna-Katharina Strohschneider |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5005","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5005,"authors_free":[{"id":5740,"entry_id":5005,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Anna-Katharina Strohschneider","free_first_name":"Anna-Katharina","free_last_name":"Strohschneider","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Metaphysics Last: Agostino on Averroes, Avicenna, and the Order of the Theoretical Sciences","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Metaphysics Last: Agostino on Averroes, Avicenna, and the Order of the Theoretical Sciences"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5005,"section_of":4998,"pages":"151\u2013187","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":4998,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Averroism between the 15th and 17th Century","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2021","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"The collection of papers assesses the impact of the reception of Averroist ideas on philosophy between the 15th and 17th century in the Latin West. Most of the articles in the volume were presented at the conference \"Averroism between the 15th and 17th century,\" which was held on 9th -10th November, 2016 by the Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Arts at Palack\u00fd University, Olomouc, the Czech Republic. The contributors explore the influence of Averroes, identify the difficulties in the interpretation of his works, and study his followers and critics in the Latin, Hebrew, and Byzantine traditions.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":4998,"pubplace":"Nordhausen","publisher":"Verlag Traugott Bautz","series":"Studia Classica et Mediaevalia","volume":"28","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Metaphysics Last: Agostino on Averroes, Avicenna, and the Order of the Theoretical Sciences"]}
| Title | Metaphysik und Intellektlehre. Philosophische Hauptthemen des Ibn Rušd (Averroes) |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | German |
| Date | 2013 |
| Published in | Islamische Philosophie im Mittelalter: ein Handbuch |
| Pages | 340–365 |
| Categories | Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | David Wirmer |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2003","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2003,"authors_free":[{"id":2444,"entry_id":2003,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":140,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"David Wirmer","free_first_name":"David","free_last_name":"Wirmer","norm_person":{"id":140,"first_name":"David","last_name":"Wirmer","full_name":"David Wirmer","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/134066669","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/13518425","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=David Wirmer"}}],"entry_title":"Metaphysik und Intellektlehre. Philosophische Hauptthemen des Ibn Ru\u0161d (Averroes)","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Metaphysik und Intellektlehre. Philosophische Hauptthemen des Ibn Ru\u0161d (Averroes)"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2013","language":"German","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":140,"full_name":"David Wirmer","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":2003,"section_of":278,"pages":"340\u2013365","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":278,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Islamische Philosophie im Mittelalter: ein Handbuch","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2013","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2013","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":278,"pubplace":"Darmstadt","publisher":"WBG (Wiss. Buchges.)","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Metaphysik und Intellektlehre. Philosophische Hauptthemen des Ibn Ru\u0161d (Averroes)"]}
| Title | Mind and Modal Judgment. Al-Ghazālī and Ibn Rushd on Conceivability and Possibility |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2006 |
| Published in | Mind and Modality. Studies in the History of Philosophy in Honour of Simo Knuutila |
| Pages | 121–139 |
| Categories | Logic, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Taneli Kukkonen |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1428","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1428,"authors_free":[{"id":1623,"entry_id":1428,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":828,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","free_first_name":"Taneli","free_last_name":"Kukkonen","norm_person":{"id":828,"first_name":"Taneli","last_name":"Kukkonen","full_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1064756859","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/242146822498007382889","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Taneli Kukkonen"}}],"entry_title":"Mind and Modal Judgment. Al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Ibn Rushd on Conceivability and Possibility","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Mind and Modal Judgment. Al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Ibn Rushd on Conceivability and Possibility"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2006","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":828,"full_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1428,"section_of":192,"pages":"121\u2013139","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":192,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Mind and Modality. Studies in the History of Philosophy in Honour of Simo Knuutila","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2006","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2006","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":192,"pubplace":"Leiden","publisher":"Brill","series":"Brill's Studies in Intellectual History","volume":"14","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Mind and Modal Judgment. Al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Ibn Rushd on Conceivability and Possibility"]}
| Title | Muhammad b. Ahmad Ibn Rushd (d.595-1198) |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Published in | Arguments for God's existence in classical Islamic thought: A Reappraisal of the Discourse |
| Pages | 172-200 |
| Categories | Theology, Metaphysics, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Hannah C. Erlwein |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5468","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5468,"authors_free":[{"id":6338,"entry_id":5468,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1817,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hannah C. Erlwein","free_first_name":"Hannah C.","free_last_name":"Erlwein","norm_person":{"id":1817,"first_name":"Hannah C.","last_name":"Erlwein","full_name":"Hannah C. Erlwein","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1191423735","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Hannah C. Erlwein"}}],"entry_title":"Muhammad b. Ahmad Ibn Rushd (d.595-1198)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Muhammad b. Ahmad Ibn Rushd (d.595-1198)"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9783110619560-010","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":1817,"full_name":"Hannah C. Erlwein","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5468,"section_of":5469,"pages":"172-200","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5469,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":1,"language":"en","title":"Arguments for God's existence in classical Islamic thought: A Reappraisal of the Discourse","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2019","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"The endeavour to prove God\u2019s existence through rational argumentation was an integral part of classical Islamic theology (kal\u0101m) and philosophy (falsafa), thus the frequently articulated assumption in the academic literature. The Islamic discourse in question is then often compared to the discourse on arguments for God\u2019s existence in the western tradition, not only in terms of its objectives but also in terms of the arguments used: Islamic thinkers, too, put forward arguments that have been labelled as cosmological, teleological, and ontological. This book, however, argues that arguments for God\u2019s existence are absent from the theological and philosophical works of the classical Islamic era. This is not to say that the arguments encountered there are flawed arguments for God\u2019s existence. Rather, it means that the arguments under consideration serve a different purpose than to prove that God exists. Through a close reading of the works of several mutakallim\u016bn and fal\u0101sifa from the 3rd\u20127th\/9th\u201213th century, such as al-B\u0101qill\u0101n\u012b and Fakhr al-D\u012bn al-R\u0101z\u012b as well as Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 and Ibn Rushd, this book proffers a re-evaluation of the discourse in question, and it suggests what its participants sought to prove if it is not that God exists.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/9783110619560","book":{"id":5469,"pubplace":"Berlin; Boston","publisher":"De Gruyter","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6339,"entry_id":5469,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1817,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hannah C. Erlwein","free_first_name":"Hannah C.","free_last_name":"Erlwein","norm_person":{"id":1817,"first_name":"Hannah C.","last_name":"Erlwein","full_name":"Hannah C. Erlwein","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1191423735","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}]}},"article":null},"sort":["Muhammad b. Ahmad Ibn Rushd (d.595-1198)"]}
| Title | Multitude et bene esse chez Averroès et Dante. Retour sur la Monarchie I,3 |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2019 |
| Published in | Dante et l’averroïsme |
| Pages | 357–383 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, De anima, Politics, Aristotle, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://books.openedition.org/lesbelleslettres/472 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5081","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5081,"authors_free":[{"id":5844,"entry_id":5081,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Multitude et bene esse chez Averro\u00e8s et Dante. Retour sur la Monarchie I,3","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Multitude et bene esse chez Averro\u00e8s et Dante. Retour sur la Monarchie I,3"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2019","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/books.openedition.org\/lesbelleslettres\/472","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5081,"section_of":5080,"pages":"357\u2013383 ","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5080,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Dante et l\u2019averro\u00efsme","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"Dante averro\u00efste ? Le plus grand po\u00e8te du Moyen \u00c2ge fut-il le disciple du plus grand philosophe arabe ? La Divine Com\u00e9die place Averro\u00e8s, l\u2019auteur du \u00ab Grand commentaire \u00bb d\u2019Aristote, en Enfer, et en Paradis son disciple latin Siger de Brabant qui, dans l\u2019actuelle \u00ab rue du Fouarre \u00bb \u00e0 Paris, mettait en syllogismes \u00ab des v\u00e9rit\u00e9s importunes \u00bb. Jugement de Salomon ?\r\n\r\nCe volume collectif traite en d\u00e9tail l\u2019un des chapitres les plus controvers\u00e9s de l\u2019histoire comme de l\u2019historiographie de la philosophie et de la th\u00e9ologie m\u00e9di\u00e9vales. Revisitant les textes philosophiques et po\u00e9tiques de Dante, de la Vita nova au Convivio, au De vulgari eloquentia et \u00e0 la Monarchia, examinant les productions et les th\u00e8ses de ses contemporains, interlocuteurs, amis et adversaires, m\u00e9decins, philosophes et po\u00e8tes, rappelant et discutant les th\u00e8ses de ses lecteurs anciens et modernes, les meilleurs sp\u00e9cialistes des domaines concern\u00e9s, philosophes et italianistes, dressent le bilan de deux si\u00e8cles d\u2019\u00e9tudes sur Dante, mais aussi sur Cavalcanti et sur l\u2019averro\u00efsme latin.\r\n\r\nSuivant trois grands axes, le langage et la pens\u00e9e, les \u00e9motions, la politique, c\u2019est au coeur de l\u2019histoire et de la culture europ\u00e9ennes, \u00e0 Paris, \u00e0 Florence, sur les routes de l\u2019exil, que les contributions ici rassembl\u00e9es plongeront lectrices et lecteurs amoureux de Dante, de l\u2019Italie et de la litt\u00e9rature.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4000\/books.lesbelleslettres.372","book":{"id":5080,"pubplace":"Paris","publisher":"Les Belles Lettres & Coll\u00e8ge de France","series":"Docet omina ","volume":"5","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Multitude et bene esse chez Averro\u00e8s et Dante. Retour sur la Monarchie I,3"]}
| Title | Métaphysique et politique “en intention seconde”: Jean de Jandun héritier d’Averroès et d’Alexandre d’Aphrodise |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2018 |
| Journal | Archives d'histoire doctrinale et littéraire du Moyen Age |
| Volume | 85 |
| Pages | 108–127 |
| Categories | Alexander of Aphrodisias, Averroism, Metaphysics, Politics |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The aim of the paper is twofold. First, to present the position of the Master of Arts John of Jandun (d. 1328) on the relationship between the metaphysical and the political; and second, to show how his solution, based on the idea of an agency “in second intention,” makes him a follower of Averroes and, more remotely, of Alexander of Aphrodisias’s doctrine on providence. Although the philosopher must play a key role in the city-state as the prince’s teacher on divine truths, this role does not make him a subordinate in any way, because he is turned towards others only in secunda intentione. How does John of Jandun flesh this out? And what does he owe to the metaphysical providence defended by his Greek and Arabic predecessors? These are the issues the paper deals with. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5079","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5079,"authors_free":[{"id":5840,"entry_id":5079,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"M\u00e9taphysique et politique \u201cen intention seconde\u201d: Jean de Jandun h\u00e9ritier d\u2019Averro\u00e8s et d\u2019Alexandre d\u2019Aphrodise","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"M\u00e9taphysique et politique \u201cen intention seconde\u201d: Jean de Jandun h\u00e9ritier d\u2019Averro\u00e8s et d\u2019Alexandre d\u2019Aphrodise"},"abstract":"The aim of the paper is twofold. First, to present the position of the Master of Arts John of Jandun (d. 1328) on the relationship between the metaphysical and the political; and second, to show how his solution, based on the idea of an agency \u201cin second intention,\u201d makes him a follower of Averroes and, more remotely, of Alexander of Aphrodisias\u2019s doctrine on providence. Although the philosopher must play a key role in the city-state as the prince\u2019s teacher on divine truths, this role does not make him a subordinate in any way, because he is turned towards others only in secunda intentione. How does John of Jandun flesh this out? And what does he owe to the metaphysical providence defended by his Greek and Arabic predecessors? These are the issues the paper deals with.","btype":3,"date":"2018","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3917\/ahdlm.085.0109","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5079,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Archives d'histoire doctrinale et litt\u00e9raire du Moyen Age","volume":"85","issue":"","pages":"108\u2013127"}},"sort":["M\u00e9taphysique et politique \u201cen intention seconde\u201d: Jean de Jandun h\u00e9ritier d\u2019Averro\u00e8s et d\u2019Alexandre d\u2019Aphrodise"]}
| Title | Nature et sagesse. Les rapports entre physique et Métaphysique dans la tradition aristotélicienne. Recueil de textes en hommage à Pierre Pellegrin |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2014 |
| Publication Place | Louvain-La-Neuve |
| Publisher | Peeters |
| Series | Aristote. Traductions et etudes |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Physics, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Cristina Cerami |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| English summary: The relationship between physics and metaphysics is one of the core questions at the heart of Aristotelian philosophy. The collected studies in this volume explore the epistemological connections between these two sciences, and especially certain essential points raised in Greek and Arabic history concerning this debate. French description: La question de savoir quel type de rapport entretiennent la physique et la metaphysique est au coeur du systeme philosophique d'Aristote. Ce rapport, toutefois, n'est pas facile a saisir, non seulement parce qu'Aristote ne l'a jamais defini de facon claire, mais parce qu'il est delicat d'en comprendre la nature a la lumiere de la theorie de la science exposee dans les Seconds Analytiques. En effet, Aristote affirme d'une part que la metaphysique, concue comme science universelle, n'a pas de genre-sujet propre, et d'autre part que la physique, quoique seconde par rapport a la metaphysique, en assure le fondement. C'est de ce rapport ambivalent que decoule le plus grand nombre d'apories liees au statut epistemologique de chacune des deux sciences comme a la nature de leur rapport. Les contributions reunies dans ce recueil s'inscrivent dans ce contexte theorique complexe. Elles portent moins sur la difficulte de comprendre le critere ou les criteres d'organisation des traites qu'on appelle Metaphysique et Physique que sur celle de presenter et de justifier l'entrelacement epistemologique de ces deux sciences, concues comme deux disciplines unitaires mais plurielles. Sans pretendre reconstruire l'histoire de la question, l'un des enjeux de ce volume fut aussi de degager, passe le texte meme d'Aristote, certains points nodaux de l'histoire grecque et arabe du debat. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2055","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2055,"authors_free":[{"id":2501,"entry_id":2055,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Cristina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"Nature et sagesse. Les rapports entre physique et M\u00e9taphysique dans la tradition aristot\u00e9licienne. Recueil de textes en hommage \u00e0 Pierre Pellegrin","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Nature et sagesse. Les rapports entre physique et M\u00e9taphysique dans la tradition aristot\u00e9licienne. Recueil de textes en hommage \u00e0 Pierre Pellegrin"},"abstract":"English summary: The relationship between physics and metaphysics is one of the core questions at the heart of Aristotelian philosophy. The collected studies in this volume explore the epistemological connections between these two sciences, and especially certain essential points raised in Greek and Arabic history concerning this debate. \r\n\r\nFrench description: La question de savoir quel type de rapport entretiennent la physique et la metaphysique est au coeur du systeme philosophique d'Aristote. Ce rapport, toutefois, n'est pas facile a saisir, non seulement parce qu'Aristote ne l'a jamais defini de facon claire, mais parce qu'il est delicat d'en comprendre la nature a la lumiere de la theorie de la science exposee dans les Seconds Analytiques. En effet, Aristote affirme d'une part que la metaphysique, concue comme science universelle, n'a pas de genre-sujet propre, et d'autre part que la physique, quoique seconde par rapport a la metaphysique, en assure le fondement. C'est de ce rapport ambivalent que decoule le plus grand nombre d'apories liees au statut epistemologique de chacune des deux sciences comme a la nature de leur rapport. Les contributions reunies dans ce recueil s'inscrivent dans ce contexte theorique complexe. Elles portent moins sur la difficulte de comprendre le critere ou les criteres d'organisation des traites qu'on appelle Metaphysique et Physique que sur celle de presenter et de justifier l'entrelacement epistemologique de ces deux sciences, concues comme deux disciplines unitaires mais plurielles. Sans pretendre reconstruire l'histoire de la question, l'un des enjeux de ce volume fut aussi de degager, passe le texte meme d'Aristote, certains points nodaux de l'histoire grecque et arabe du debat.","btype":4,"date":"2014","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":2055,"pubplace":"Louvain-La-Neuve","publisher":"Peeters","series":"Aristote. Traductions et etudes","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Nature et sagesse. Les rapports entre physique et M\u00e9taphysique dans la tradition aristot\u00e9licienne. Recueil de textes en hommage \u00e0 Pierre Pellegrin"]}
| Title | Necesidad y posibilidad en Averroes |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2008 |
| Published in | El Corán ayer y hoy. Perspectivas actuales sobre el islam. Estudios en honor del profesor Julio Cortés |
| Pages | 63–89 |
| Categories | Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Josep Puig Montada |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1398","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1398,"authors_free":[{"id":1591,"entry_id":1398,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":343,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Josep Puig Montada","free_first_name":"Josep","free_last_name":"Puig Montada","norm_person":{"id":343,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Josep Puig Montada","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/188325034","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61625512","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Josep Puig Montada"}}],"entry_title":"Necesidad y posibilidad en Averroes","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Necesidad y posibilidad en Averroes"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2008","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":343,"full_name":"Josep Puig Montada","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1398,"section_of":176,"pages":"63\u201389","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":176,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"El Cor\u00e1n ayer y hoy. Perspectivas actuales sobre el islam. Estudios en honor del profesor Julio Cort\u00e9s","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2008","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2008","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":176,"pubplace":"C\u00f3rdoba","publisher":"Berenice","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Necesidad y posibilidad en Averroes"]}
| Title | New Wine in Old Vessels: Alexander of Aphrodisias as a Source for Averroes’ Metaphysics |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Published in | Alexander of Aphrodisias in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance |
| Pages | 59–76 |
| Categories | Alexander of Aphrodisias, Commentary, Aristotle, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Matteo Di Giovanni |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Besides his best-known merits as a philosopher, Averroes stands out in the history of the classical tradition as a unique testimony to Alexander’s lost commentary on Metaphysics Lambda and, through it, his interpretation of the argument running through the whole text of the Metaphysics. The gist of this interpretation is laid out in the elaborate prologue to the Lambda commentary that goes back to Alexander and is preserved by Averroes. Building on this textual evidence, the study investigates Averroes’ philosophical appropriation of the Alexander material that is interwoven into the fabric of the former’s exegesis, from the earlier epitome to the later long commentary on the Metaphysics. A number of doctrines turn out to be ultimately inspired by Alexander, including Averroes’ view of the tripartite structure of metaphysics, his notion of book Gamma as an epistemology (“specific logic”) for metaphysics, the function of Delta, the downgrading of both mental and accidental being in Epsilon, and Aristotle’s argument in Zeta. Averroes’ debt to his source is brought to the fore without prejudicing the further question, awaiting future research, of whether Averroes’ acquaintance with Alexander’s line of interpretation was always unmediated or any figures in the philosophical tradition played some role in its transmission. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5030","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5030,"authors_free":[{"id":5774,"entry_id":5030,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":734,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Matteo Di Giovanni","free_first_name":"Matteo","free_last_name":"Di Giovanni","norm_person":{"id":734,"first_name":"Matteo","last_name":"Di Giovanni","full_name":"Matteo di Giovanni","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1130687570","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/9497149368819485980007","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Matteo di Giovanni"}}],"entry_title":"New Wine in Old Vessels: Alexander of Aphrodisias as a Source for Averroes\u2019 Metaphysics","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"New Wine in Old Vessels: Alexander of Aphrodisias as a Source for Averroes\u2019 Metaphysics"},"abstract":"Besides his best-known merits as a philosopher, Averroes stands out in the history of the classical tradition as a unique testimony to Alexander\u2019s lost commentary on Metaphysics Lambda and, through it, his interpretation of the argument running through the whole text of the Metaphysics. The gist of this interpretation is laid out in the elaborate prologue to the Lambda commentary that goes back to Alexander and is preserved by Averroes. Building on this textual evidence, the study investigates Averroes\u2019 philosophical appropriation of the Alexander material that is interwoven into the fabric of the former\u2019s exegesis, from the earlier epitome to the later long commentary on the Metaphysics. A number of doctrines turn out to be ultimately inspired by Alexander, including Averroes\u2019 view of the tripartite structure of metaphysics, his notion of book Gamma as an epistemology (\u201cspecific logic\u201d) for metaphysics, the function of Delta, the downgrading of both mental and accidental being in Epsilon, and Aristotle\u2019s argument in Zeta. Averroes\u2019 debt to his source is brought to the fore without prejudicing the further question, awaiting future research, of whether Averroes\u2019 acquaintance with Alexander\u2019s line of interpretation was always unmediated or any figures in the philosophical tradition played some role in its transmission.","btype":2,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1484\/M.SA-EB.5.120536","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":734,"full_name":"Matteo di Giovanni","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5030,"section_of":5029,"pages":"59\u201376","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5029,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Alexander of Aphrodisias in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2021","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"The greatest ancient interpreter of Aristotle, Alexander of Aphrodisias (fl. 200 AD) exerted a profound and enduring influence upon philosophy from Boethius until the modern era. Alexander\u2019s interpretations laid the foundation for multiple philosophical views which were promoted as quintessentially Aristotelian by both Islamic and Latin thinkers throughout the Middle Ages. In the Renaissance, the University of Padua, a leading center of philosophical education and thought, established a scholarly tradition named \u201cAlexandrinism\u201d after him. ","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1484\/M.SA-EB.5.119428","book":{"id":5029,"pubplace":"Turnhout","publisher":"Brepols","series":"Studia artistarum","volume":"45","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["New Wine in Old Vessels: Alexander of Aphrodisias as a Source for Averroes\u2019 Metaphysics"]}
| Title | Note sur la doctrine rushdienne de la substance, d'après le Grand Commentaire de la Métaphysique |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2002 |
| Published in | Averroes (1126–1198) oder der Triumph des Rationalismus. Internationales Symposium anlässlich des 800. Todestages des islamischen Philosophen. Heidelberg, 7.-11. Oktober 1998 |
| Pages | 233–242 |
| Categories | Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Laurence Bauloye |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"547","_score":null,"_source":{"id":547,"authors_free":[{"id":694,"entry_id":547,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":814,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Laurence Bauloye","free_first_name":"Laurence","free_last_name":"Bauloye","norm_person":{"id":814,"first_name":"Laurence","last_name":"Bauloye","full_name":"Laurence Bauloye","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/152664165","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/59337898","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Laurence Bauloye"}}],"entry_title":"Note sur la doctrine rushdienne de la substance, d'apr\u00e8s le Grand Commentaire de la M\u00e9taphysique","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Note sur la doctrine rushdienne de la substance, d'apr\u00e8s le Grand Commentaire de la M\u00e9taphysique"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2002","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":814,"full_name":"Laurence Bauloye","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":547,"section_of":31,"pages":"233\u2013242","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":31,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Averroes (1126\u20131198) oder der Triumph des Rationalismus. Internationales Symposium anl\u00e4sslich des 800. Todestages des islamischen Philosophen. Heidelberg, 7.-11. Oktober 1998","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2002","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2002","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":31,"pubplace":"Heidelberg","publisher":"Universit\u00e4tsverlag Winter","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Note sur la doctrine rushdienne de la substance, d'apr\u00e8s le Grand Commentaire de la M\u00e9taphysique"]}