| Title | Methods and Methodologies. Aristotelian Logic East and West, 500-1500 |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2011 |
| Publication Place | Leiden, Boston |
| Publisher | Brill |
| Series | Investigating Medieval Philosophy |
| Volume | 2 |
| Categories | Logic, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Margaret Cameron , John Marenbon |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Methods and Methodologies explores two questions about studying the Aristotelian tradition of logic. The first, addressed by the chapters on methods in the first half of the book, is directly about the medieval logical commentaries, treatises and handbooks. How did medieval authors in the different traditions, Latin and Arabic, go about their work on Aristotelian logic? In particular, how did they themselves conceive the relationship between logic and other branches of philosophy and disciplines outside philosophy? The second question is about methodologies, the subject of the chapters in the second half of the book: it invites writers to reflect on their own and their colleagues’ practice as twenty-first century interpreters of this medieval writing on Aristotelian logic. Contributors are Sten Ebbesen, Christopher J. Martin, Christophe Erismann, Andrew Arlig, Simo Knuuttila, Amos Bertolacci, Jennifer Ashworth, Paul Thom, Gyula Klima, Matteo di Giovanni and Margaret Cameron. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"226","_score":null,"_source":{"id":226,"authors_free":[{"id":349,"entry_id":226,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1438,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Margaret Cameron","free_first_name":"Margaret","free_last_name":"Cameron","norm_person":{"id":1438,"first_name":"Margaret","last_name":"Cameron","full_name":"Margaret Cameron","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1043445064","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/132770563","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd1043445064.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Margaret Cameron"}},{"id":350,"entry_id":226,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1439,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"John Marenbon","free_first_name":"John","free_last_name":"Marenbon","norm_person":{"id":1439,"first_name":"John","last_name":"Marenbon","full_name":"John Marenbon","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1028168616","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27078808","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd1028168616.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=John Marenbon"}}],"entry_title":"Methods and Methodologies. Aristotelian Logic East and West, 500-1500","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Methods and Methodologies. Aristotelian Logic East and West, 500-1500"},"abstract":"Methods and Methodologies explores two questions about studying the Aristotelian tradition of logic. The first, addressed by the chapters on methods in the first half of the book, is directly about the medieval logical commentaries, treatises and handbooks. How did medieval authors in the different traditions, Latin and Arabic, go about their work on Aristotelian logic? In particular, how did they themselves conceive the relationship between logic and other branches of philosophy and disciplines outside philosophy? The second question is about methodologies, the subject of the chapters in the second half of the book: it invites writers to reflect on their own and their colleagues\u2019 practice as twenty-first century interpreters of this medieval writing on Aristotelian logic.\r\nContributors are Sten Ebbesen, Christopher J. Martin, Christophe Erismann, Andrew Arlig, Simo Knuuttila, Amos Bertolacci, Jennifer Ashworth, Paul Thom, Gyula Klima, Matteo di Giovanni and Margaret Cameron.","btype":4,"date":"2011","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/ej.9789004188853.i-246","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1438,"full_name":"Margaret Cameron","role":2},{"id":1439,"full_name":"John Marenbon","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":226,"pubplace":"Leiden, Boston","publisher":"Brill","series":"Investigating Medieval Philosophy","volume":"2","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2011]}
| Title | Reason and Revelation for an Averroist Pursuit of Convivencia and Intercultural Dialogue |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | Policy Futures in Education |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 81-87 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Averroism |
| Author(s) | Driss Habti |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Throughout medieval thought, a major issue raised was that of the relationship between religion and philosophy. Alternative frameworks see the problem as a conflict between faith and reason, tradition and speculation, mysticism and rationalism. The medieval Muslim philosopher Ibn Rushd, or Averroes, (1126–98), who lived in medieval Spain, attempts in his philosophy to reconcile philosophy with religion. This article probes into an ‘Averroist dialogue’ through his rationalist philosophy. Meanwhile, al-Ghazali (1058–1111), from Persia, tends towards an Islamic philosophy based on cause and effect and determined by God. Ibn Rushd's retaliation to al-Ghazali was his defence of the primacy of philosophy and reason, and a call for diversity of knowledge. Ibn Rushd explicates the relation between religion and philosophy as two different ways of reaching the same truth, and clarifies the connection between Islamic law and Greek science, striving for a rapprochement between the Islamic ‘I’ and the European ‘Other’ through his epistemological principles of dialogue in a time of convivencia (coexistence) in medieval Andalusia. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5774","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5774,"authors_free":[{"id":6687,"entry_id":5774,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1897,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Driss Habti","free_first_name":"Driss ","free_last_name":"Habti","norm_person":{"id":1897,"first_name":"Driss","last_name":"Habti","full_name":"Driss Habti","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1135928444","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Driss Habti"}}],"entry_title":"Reason and Revelation for an Averroist Pursuit of Convivencia and Intercultural Dialogue","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Reason and Revelation for an Averroist Pursuit of Convivencia and Intercultural Dialogue"},"abstract":"Throughout medieval thought, a major issue raised was that of the relationship between religion and philosophy. Alternative frameworks see the problem as a conflict between faith and reason, tradition and speculation, mysticism and rationalism. The medieval Muslim philosopher Ibn Rushd, or Averroes, (1126\u201398), who lived in medieval Spain, attempts in his philosophy to reconcile philosophy with religion. This article probes into an \u2018Averroist dialogue\u2019 through his rationalist philosophy. Meanwhile, al-Ghazali (1058\u20131111), from Persia, tends towards an Islamic philosophy based on cause and effect and determined by God. Ibn Rushd's retaliation to al-Ghazali was his defence of the primacy of philosophy and reason, and a call for diversity of knowledge. Ibn Rushd explicates the relation between religion and philosophy as two different ways of reaching the same truth, and clarifies the connection between Islamic law and Greek science, striving for a rapprochement between the Islamic \u2018I\u2019 and the European \u2018Other\u2019 through his epistemological principles of dialogue in a time of convivencia (coexistence) in medieval Andalusia.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2304\/pfie.2011.9.1.81","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":1897,"full_name":"Driss Habti","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5774,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Policy Futures in Education","volume":"9","issue":"1","pages":"81-87"}},"sort":[2011]}
| Title | Greek essence and Islamic Tolerance : Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rush’d |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | The Review of Metaphysics |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 41–61 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, al-Ġazālī, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Michael Sweeney |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The philosophical affirmation of essence by Al-Farabi (his preferred position) and Ibn Rush'd allows for toleration of rehgion as an inferior but necessary way of life for most human beings. Since both AlFarabi's democracy and his political regime based on essence achieve varying degrees of tolerance by subordinating rehgion, the choice is between tolerance and the superiority of rehgion; that is, all agree that it is not possible to reconcile the supremacy of religion with a broad political tolerance. According to Al-Farabi, the question of tolerance, like the questions of politics in general, centers on the natural differences among human beings in their ability to grasp essence. |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/23055682 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5377","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5377,"authors_free":[{"id":6229,"entry_id":5377,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Michael Sweeney","free_first_name":"Michael","free_last_name":"Sweeney","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Greek essence and Islamic Tolerance : Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rush\u2019d","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Greek essence and Islamic Tolerance : Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rush\u2019d"},"abstract":"The philosophical affirmation of essence by Al-Farabi (his preferred position) and Ibn Rush'd allows for toleration of rehgion as an inferior but necessary way of life for most human beings. Since both AlFarabi's democracy and his political regime based on essence achieve varying degrees of tolerance by subordinating rehgion, the choice is between tolerance and the superiority of rehgion; that is, all agree that it is not possible to reconcile the supremacy of religion with a broad political tolerance. According to Al-Farabi, the question of tolerance, like the questions of politics in general, centers on the natural differences among human beings in their ability to grasp essence.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/23055682","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5377,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Review of Metaphysics","volume":"65","issue":"1","pages":"41\u201361"}},"sort":[2011]}
| Title | Topique et syllogistique. La tradition arabe (Al-Fārābī et Averroès) |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2010 |
| Published in | Les lieux de l'argumentation. Histoire du syllogisme topique d'Aristote à Leibniz |
| Pages | 191–226 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, Logic, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Ahmad Hasnawi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1407","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1407,"authors_free":[{"id":1599,"entry_id":1407,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":788,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ahmad Hasnawi","free_first_name":"Ahmad","free_last_name":"Hasnawi","norm_person":{"id":788,"first_name":"Ahmad","last_name":"Hasnawi","full_name":"Ahmad Hasnawi","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1011618869","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29672431","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ahmad Hasnawi"}}],"entry_title":"Topique et syllogistique. La tradition arabe (Al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b et Averro\u00e8s)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Topique et syllogistique. La tradition arabe (Al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b et Averro\u00e8s)"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2010","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":788,"full_name":"Ahmad Hasnawi","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1407,"section_of":181,"pages":"191\u2013226","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":181,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Les lieux de l'argumentation. Histoire du syllogisme topique d'Aristote \u00e0 Leibniz","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2010","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2010","abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":181,"pubplace":"Turnhout","publisher":"Brepols","series":"Studia Artistarum","volume":"22","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":277,"entry_id":181,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1302,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Jo\u00ebl Biard","free_first_name":"Jo\u00ebl","free_last_name":"Biard","norm_person":{"id":1302,"first_name":"Jo\u00ebl","last_name":"Biard","full_name":"Jo\u00ebl Biard","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/111891027","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/85246900","db_url":"","from_claudius":1}},{"id":278,"entry_id":181,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1303,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Fosca Mariani Zini","free_first_name":"Fosca Mariani","free_last_name":"Zini","norm_person":{"id":1303,"first_name":"Fosca Mariani","last_name":"Zini","full_name":"Fosca Mariani Zini","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/141625953","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/41980761","db_url":"","from_claudius":1}}]}},"article":null},"sort":[2010]}
| Title | Latin Averroes Translations of the First Half of the Thirteenth Century |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2010 |
| Publication Place | Hildesheim, Zürich New York |
| Publisher | Georg Olms Verlag |
| Categories | Transmission, Tradition and Reception, Latin Averroism |
| Author(s) | Dag N. Hasse |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1365","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1365,"authors_free":[{"id":1554,"entry_id":1365,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1136,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Dag N. Hasse","free_first_name":"Dag N.","free_last_name":"Hasse","norm_person":{"id":1136,"first_name":"Dag N.","last_name":"Hasse","full_name":"Dag N. Hasse","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/11800638X","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/5717273","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Dag N. Hasse"}}],"entry_title":"Latin Averroes Translations of the First Half of the Thirteenth Century","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Latin Averroes Translations of the First Half of the Thirteenth Century"},"abstract":null,"btype":1,"date":"2010","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":1136,"full_name":"Dag N. Hasse","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":1365,"pubplace":"Hildesheim, Z\u00fcrich New York","publisher":"Georg Olms Verlag","series":null,"volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2010]}
| Title | Philosophy in the Middle Ages. The Christian, Islamic and Jewish Traditions |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2010 |
| Publication Place | Indianapolis |
| Publisher | Hackett |
| Edition No. | 3 (2nd Edition: 1987; 1st Edition: 1967) |
| Categories | Psychology, Tradition and Reception, Surveys |
| Author(s) | Arthur Hyman , James J. Walsh , Thomas Williams |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Thomas Williams' revision of Arthur Hyman and James J. Walsh's classic compendium of writings in the Christian, Islamic, and Jewish medieval philosophical traditions expands the breadth of coverage that helped make its predecessor the best known and most widely used collection of its kind. The third edition builds on the strengths of the second by preserving its essential shape while adding several important new texts--including works by Augustine, Boethius, Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, Anselm, al-Farabi, al-Ghazali, Ibn Rushd, Bonaventure, Thomas Aquinas, and John Duns Scotus--and featuring new translations of many others. The volume has also been redesigned and its bibliographies updated with the needs of a new generation of students in mind. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1921","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1921,"authors_free":[{"id":6165,"entry_id":1921,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":75,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Arthur Hyman","free_first_name":"Arthur","free_last_name":"Hyman","norm_person":{"id":75,"first_name":"Arthur","last_name":"Hyman","full_name":"Arthur Hyman","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118863800","viaf_url":"","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Arthur Hyman"}},{"id":6166,"entry_id":1921,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"James J. Walsh","free_first_name":"James J.","free_last_name":"Walsh","norm_person":null},{"id":6167,"entry_id":1921,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Thomas Williams","free_first_name":"Thomas","free_last_name":"Williams","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Philosophy in the Middle Ages. The Christian, Islamic and Jewish Traditions","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Philosophy in the Middle Ages. The Christian, Islamic and Jewish Traditions"},"abstract":"Thomas Williams' revision of Arthur Hyman and James J. Walsh's classic compendium of writings in the Christian, Islamic, and Jewish medieval philosophical traditions expands the breadth of coverage that helped make its predecessor the best known and most widely used collection of its kind.\r\n\r\nThe third edition builds on the strengths of the second by preserving its essential shape while adding several important new texts--including works by Augustine, Boethius, Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, Anselm, al-Farabi, al-Ghazali, Ibn Rushd, Bonaventure, Thomas Aquinas, and John Duns Scotus--and featuring new translations of many others.\r\n\r\nThe volume has also been redesigned and its bibliographies updated with the needs of a new generation of students in mind.","btype":1,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"}],"authors":[{"id":75,"full_name":"Arthur Hyman","role":2}],"works":[{"id":68,"aw_title":"Long Commentary on De Anima"}],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":1921,"pubplace":"Indianapolis","publisher":"Hackett","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"3 (2nd Edition: 1987; 1st Edition: 1967)","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2010]}
| Title | Thomas d'Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d'Averroès à Phys. I, 1 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2009 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 189–223 |
| Categories | Thomas, Commentary, Physics, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Cristina Cerami |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The present article aims to provide a reconstruction of the interpretation offered by Thomas Aquinas of the cognitive process described at the beginning of Aristotle's Physics and of his criticism of Averroes' interpretation. It expounds to this end the exegesis of ancient Greek commentators who opened the debate on this question; then, it puts forward a reconstruction of Aquinas' doctrine by means of other texts of his corpus, as well as an explanation of his criticism of Averroes' exegesis; it finally reconstructs Averroes' interpretation worked out in his Great Commentary to Phys. I, 1, in order to show that Aquinas' disapproval is partly due to an incorrect interpretation of Averroes' divisio textus of Phys. I, 1. It suggests as well that, concerning some fundamental points, Aquinas' exegesis doesn't diverge from the interpretation proposed by Averroes. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1382","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1382,"authors_free":[{"id":1574,"entry_id":1382,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1285,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Cristina Cerami","free_first_name":"Cristina","free_last_name":"Cerami","norm_person":{"id":1285,"first_name":"Cristina","last_name":"Cerami","full_name":"Cristina Cerami","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139713840","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/317111513","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Cristina Cerami"}}],"entry_title":"Thomas d'Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 Phys. I, 1","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Thomas d'Aquin lecteur critique du Grand Commentaire d'Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 Phys. I, 1"},"abstract":"The present article aims to provide a reconstruction of the interpretation offered by Thomas Aquinas of the cognitive process described at the beginning of Aristotle's Physics and of his criticism of Averroes' interpretation. It expounds to this end the exegesis of ancient Greek commentators who opened the debate on this question; then, it puts forward a reconstruction of Aquinas' doctrine by means of other texts of his corpus, as well as an explanation of his criticism of Averroes' exegesis; it finally reconstructs Averroes' interpretation worked out in his Great Commentary to Phys. I, 1, in order to show that Aquinas' disapproval is partly due to an incorrect interpretation of Averroes' divisio textus of Phys. I, 1. It suggests as well that, concerning some fundamental points, Aquinas' exegesis doesn't diverge from the interpretation proposed by Averroes.","btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1285,"full_name":"Cristina Cerami","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1382,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"19","issue":"2","pages":"189\u2013223"}},"sort":[2009]}
| Title | Les limites du language comme limites du monde. Averroès et Montaigne |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2009 |
| Published in | Entre Islam Et Occident, la Méditerranée? |
| Pages | 23–27 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Ali Benmakhlouf |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1462","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1462,"authors_free":[{"id":1666,"entry_id":1462,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":774,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","free_first_name":"Ali","free_last_name":"Benmakhlouf","norm_person":{"id":774,"first_name":"Ali","last_name":"Benmakhlouf","full_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/120589850","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/24737587","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ali Benmakhlouf"}}],"entry_title":"Les limites du language comme limites du monde. Averro\u00e8s et Montaigne","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Les limites du language comme limites du monde. Averro\u00e8s et Montaigne"},"abstract":null,"btype":2,"date":"2009","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":774,"full_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":1462,"section_of":204,"pages":"23\u201327","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":204,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"reference","type":4,"language":null,"title":"Entre Islam Et Occident, la M\u00e9diterran\u00e9e?","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"short_title":null,"has_no_author":0,"volume":null,"date":"2009","edition_no":null,"free_date":"2009","abstract":null,"republication_of":null,"online_url":null,"online_resources":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":null,"doi_url":null,"book":{"id":204,"pubplace":"\u00c9ditions Parenth\u00e8ses","publisher":"Marseille","series":"Rencontres d'Averro\u00e8s","volume":"15","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":[2009]}
| Title | Long Commentary on the De Anima of Aristotle |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2009 |
| Publication Place | New Haven, London |
| Publisher | Yale University Press |
| Series | Yale Library of Medieval Philosophy |
| Categories | Psychology, Transmission, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Averroes , |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) | Thérèse-Anne Druart |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1484","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1484,"authors_free":[{"id":1700,"entry_id":1484,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":85,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Averroes","free_first_name":null,"free_last_name":null,"norm_person":{"id":85,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Averroes","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118505238","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/19688718","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/gnd118505238.html","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Averroes"}},{"id":1701,"entry_id":1484,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":711,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":3,"role_name":"translator"},"free_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se-Anne Druart","free_first_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se-Anne","free_last_name":"Druart","norm_person":{"id":711,"first_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se-Anne","last_name":"Druart","full_name":"Th\u00e9r\u00e8se-Anne Druart","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/15196890X","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/91980804","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Th\u00e9r\u00e8se-Anne Druart"}}],"entry_title":"Long Commentary on the De Anima of Aristotle","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Long Commentary on the De Anima of Aristotle"},"abstract":null,"btype":1,"date":"2009","language":null,"online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":85,"full_name":"Averroes","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":1484,"pubplace":"New Haven, London","publisher":"Yale University Press","series":"Yale Library of Medieval Philosophy","volume":null,"edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2009]}
| Title | Ibn Sabʿīn's Sicilian Questions. The Text, its Sources, and their Historical Context |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2008 |
| Journal | Al-Qanṭara |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 115–146 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Anna Ayşe Akasoy |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The Sicilian Questions are the earliest preserved text of the philosopher and Sufi Ibn Sabʿīn of Murcia (c. 614/1217–668/1270). Even though the prologue of the text claims that it is a response to questions sent by Frederick II to the Arab world, it seems more likely that it was an introductory manual for Arab students of philosophy, dealing with four specific and controversial problems as a way of presenting general concepts of Aristotelian philosophy. This article analyses the structure and way of argumentation in the Sicilian Questions. Particular attention is being paid to the relationship between mysticism and philosophy and the sources of the text, above all the philosophical writings of Ibn Rushd. Ibn Sabʿīn and his Sicilian Questions are interpreted as reflecting the intellectual milieu of late Almohad Spain. The text might have been originally composed in a ṭalaba context, and it also reflects some of the key concerns of Almohad ideology. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1354","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1354,"authors_free":[{"id":1542,"entry_id":1354,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1262,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Anna Ay\u015fe Akasoy","free_first_name":"Anna Ay\u015fe","free_last_name":"Akasoy","norm_person":{"id":1262,"first_name":"Anna","last_name":"Akasoy","full_name":"Anna Akasoy","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/123948495","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/64256771","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd123948495.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Anna Akasoy"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Sab\u02bf\u012bn's Sicilian Questions. The Text, its Sources, and their Historical Context","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ibn Sab\u02bf\u012bn's Sicilian Questions. The Text, its Sources, and their Historical Context"},"abstract":"The Sicilian Questions are the earliest preserved text of the philosopher and Sufi Ibn Sab\u02bf\u012bn of Murcia (c. 614\/1217\u2013668\/1270). Even though the prologue of the text claims that it is a response to questions sent by Frederick II to the Arab world, it seems more likely that it was an introductory manual for Arab students of philosophy, dealing with four specific and controversial problems as a way of presenting general concepts of Aristotelian philosophy. This article analyses the structure and way of argumentation in the Sicilian Questions. Particular attention is being paid to the relationship between mysticism and philosophy and the sources of the text, above all the philosophical writings of Ibn Rushd. Ibn Sab\u02bf\u012bn and his Sicilian Questions are interpreted as reflecting the intellectual milieu of late Almohad Spain. The text might have been originally composed in a \u1e6dalaba context, and it also reflects some of the key concerns of Almohad ideology.","btype":3,"date":"2008","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1262,"full_name":"Anna Akasoy","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1354,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Qan\u1e6dara","volume":"29","issue":"1","pages":"115\u2013146"}},"sort":[2008]}
| Title | Philosophy in the Middle Ages. The Christian, Islamic and Jewish Traditions |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2010 |
| Publication Place | Indianapolis |
| Publisher | Hackett |
| Edition No. | 3 (2nd Edition: 1987; 1st Edition: 1967) |
| Categories | Psychology, Tradition and Reception, Surveys |
| Author(s) | Arthur Hyman , James J. Walsh , Thomas Williams |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Thomas Williams' revision of Arthur Hyman and James J. Walsh's classic compendium of writings in the Christian, Islamic, and Jewish medieval philosophical traditions expands the breadth of coverage that helped make its predecessor the best known and most widely used collection of its kind. The third edition builds on the strengths of the second by preserving its essential shape while adding several important new texts--including works by Augustine, Boethius, Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, Anselm, al-Farabi, al-Ghazali, Ibn Rushd, Bonaventure, Thomas Aquinas, and John Duns Scotus--and featuring new translations of many others. The volume has also been redesigned and its bibliographies updated with the needs of a new generation of students in mind. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1921","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1921,"authors_free":[{"id":6165,"entry_id":1921,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":75,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Arthur Hyman","free_first_name":"Arthur","free_last_name":"Hyman","norm_person":{"id":75,"first_name":"Arthur","last_name":"Hyman","full_name":"Arthur Hyman","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/118863800","viaf_url":"","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Arthur Hyman"}},{"id":6166,"entry_id":1921,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"James J. Walsh","free_first_name":"James J.","free_last_name":"Walsh","norm_person":null},{"id":6167,"entry_id":1921,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Thomas Williams","free_first_name":"Thomas","free_last_name":"Williams","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Philosophy in the Middle Ages. The Christian, Islamic and Jewish Traditions","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Philosophy in the Middle Ages. The Christian, Islamic and Jewish Traditions"},"abstract":"Thomas Williams' revision of Arthur Hyman and James J. Walsh's classic compendium of writings in the Christian, Islamic, and Jewish medieval philosophical traditions expands the breadth of coverage that helped make its predecessor the best known and most widely used collection of its kind.\r\n\r\nThe third edition builds on the strengths of the second by preserving its essential shape while adding several important new texts--including works by Augustine, Boethius, Pseudo-Dionysius the Areopagite, Anselm, al-Farabi, al-Ghazali, Ibn Rushd, Bonaventure, Thomas Aquinas, and John Duns Scotus--and featuring new translations of many others.\r\n\r\nThe volume has also been redesigned and its bibliographies updated with the needs of a new generation of students in mind.","btype":1,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"}],"authors":[{"id":75,"full_name":"Arthur Hyman","role":2}],"works":[{"id":68,"aw_title":"Long Commentary on De Anima"}],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":1921,"pubplace":"Indianapolis","publisher":"Hackett","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"3 (2nd Edition: 1987; 1st Edition: 1967)","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Philosophy in the Middle Ages. The Christian, Islamic and Jewish Traditions"]}
| Title | Philosophy: Averroes's Partisans and Enemies |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2016 |
| Published in | Success and Suppression: Arabic Sciences and Philosophy in the Renaissance |
| Pages | 179-247 |
| Categories | Renaissance, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Dag Nikolaus Hasse |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5482","_score":null,"_ignored":["booksection.book.abstract.keyword"],"_source":{"id":5482,"authors_free":[{"id":6357,"entry_id":5482,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1722,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Dag Nikolaus Hasse","free_first_name":"Dag Nikolaus","free_last_name":"Hasse","norm_person":{"id":1722,"first_name":"Dag Nikolaus","last_name":"Hasse","full_name":"Dag Nikolaus Hasse","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/11800638X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Dag Nikolaus Hasse"}}],"entry_title":"Philosophy: Averroes's Partisans and Enemies","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Philosophy: Averroes's Partisans and Enemies"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2016","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4159\/9780674973664-008","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1722,"full_name":"Dag Nikolaus Hasse","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5482,"section_of":5248,"pages":"179-247","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5248,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":1,"language":"en","title":"Success and Suppression: Arabic Sciences and Philosophy in the Renaissance","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2016","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"Dag Nikolaus Hasse shows how ideological and scientific motives led to the decline of Arabic traditions in European culture. The Renaissance was a turning point: on the one hand, Arabic scientific traditions reached their peak of influence in Europe; on the other, during this period the West began to forget, or suppress, its debt to Arabic culture.","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5248,"pubplace":"Cambridge, Massachusetts; London, England","publisher":"Harvard University Press","series":"I Tatti Studies in Italian Renaissance History","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"persons":[{"id":6057,"entry_id":5248,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1722,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Dag Nikolaus Hasse","free_first_name":"Dag Nikolaus","free_last_name":"Hasse","norm_person":{"id":1722,"first_name":"Dag Nikolaus","last_name":"Hasse","full_name":"Dag Nikolaus Hasse","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/11800638X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null}}]}},"article":null},"sort":["Philosophy: Averroes's Partisans and Enemies"]}
| Title | Pietro Pomponazzi, Averroes, and the Accusation of Imposture |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph |
| Volume | 68 |
| Pages | 93–103 |
| Categories | Renaissance, Tradition and Reception, Psychology, Ethics |
| Author(s) | Craig Martin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Les spécialistes ont longtemps accusé Pietro Pomponazzi d’utiliser la duperie comme une technique pour échapper à la censure de l’Église au sujet de ses thèses sur la mortalité de l’âme et le fondement matériel de la religion. Un examen conjoint du De immortalitate animae et du De incantationibus témoigne non pas d’une promotion de la duperie mais plutôt d’une cohérence entre sa compréhension de l’utilisation politique des fables et des mythes et sa compréhension de l’entendement humain, de l’âme et de la nature de la moralité. Ces thèses dépendent en partie de sa lecture d’Averroès. En particulier, il était d’avis que l’écriture n’était porteuse ni de vérité ni de fausseté au sens strict. Cependant, Pomponazzi s’écarta d’Averroès parce que son rejet de la psychologie était mêlé d’une conception pessimiste de la nature humaine qu’il considérait comme étant éloignée de l’intellection et incapable d’obtenir la vérité. |
| Online Access | https://journals.usj.edu.lb/melanges/article/view/544 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5054","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5054,"authors_free":[{"id":5804,"entry_id":5054,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1480,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Craig Martin","free_first_name":"Craig","free_last_name":"Martin","norm_person":{"id":1480,"first_name":"Craig","last_name":"Martin","full_name":"Craig Martin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/143043714","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/106785793","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Craig Martin"}}],"entry_title":"Pietro Pomponazzi, Averroes, and the Accusation of Imposture","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Pietro Pomponazzi, Averroes, and the Accusation of Imposture"},"abstract":"Les sp\u00e9cialistes ont longtemps accus\u00e9 Pietro Pomponazzi d\u2019utiliser la duperie comme une technique pour \u00e9chapper \u00e0 la censure de l\u2019\u00c9glise au sujet de ses th\u00e8ses sur la mortalit\u00e9 de l\u2019\u00e2me et le fondement mat\u00e9riel de la religion. Un examen conjoint du De immortalitate animae et du De incantationibus t\u00e9moigne non pas d\u2019une promotion de la duperie mais plut\u00f4t d\u2019une coh\u00e9rence entre sa compr\u00e9hension de l\u2019utilisation politique des fables et des mythes et sa compr\u00e9hension de l\u2019entendement humain, de l\u2019\u00e2me et de la nature de la moralit\u00e9. Ces th\u00e8ses d\u00e9pendent en partie de sa lecture d\u2019Averro\u00e8s. En particulier, il \u00e9tait d\u2019avis que l\u2019\u00e9criture n\u2019\u00e9tait porteuse ni de v\u00e9rit\u00e9 ni de fausset\u00e9 au sens strict. Cependant, Pomponazzi s\u2019\u00e9carta d\u2019Averro\u00e8s parce que son rejet de la psychologie \u00e9tait m\u00eal\u00e9 d\u2019une conception pessimiste de la nature humaine qu\u2019il consid\u00e9rait comme \u00e9tant \u00e9loign\u00e9e de l\u2019intellection et incapable d\u2019obtenir la v\u00e9rit\u00e9.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/journals.usj.edu.lb\/melanges\/article\/view\/544","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"}],"authors":[{"id":1480,"full_name":"Craig Martin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5054,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l\u2019Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"68","issue":"","pages":"93\u2013103"}},"sort":["Pietro Pomponazzi, Averroes, and the Accusation of Imposture"]}
| Title | Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary |
| Type | Edited Book |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Publisher | Boydell & Brewer |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, Ibn Bāǧǧa, Logic, Theology, Politics, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Alexander Orwin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5346","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5346,"authors_free":[{"id":6196,"entry_id":5346,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1790,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":" Alexander Orwin","free_first_name":" Alexander","free_last_name":" Orwin","norm_person":{"id":1790,"first_name":" Alexander","last_name":" Orwin","full_name":" Alexander Orwin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/1153328348","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]= Alexander Orwin"}}],"entry_title":"Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary"},"abstract":"","btype":4,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/9781800104983","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":17,"category_name":"Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a","link":"bib?categories[]=Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1790,"full_name":" Alexander Orwin","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":5346,"pubplace":"","publisher":" Boydell & Brewer","series":"","volume":"","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Plato's Republic in the Islamic Context. New Perspectives on Averroes's Commentary"]}
| Title | Porphyry’s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | Studia graeco-arabica |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 107–124 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Boethius |
| Author(s) | Charles Manekin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Although most students during the Middle Ages began their study of the Organon with Porphyry’s summary of the predicables in the Isagoge, Jewish students in Christian lands studied it mostly via Averroes’ paraphrase or “Middle Commentary”, since Porphyry’s text was not translated into Hebrew. The popularity of Averroes’ paraphrase was impressive; it is extant in over 80 Hebrew manuscripts, upon which there are thirteen extant Hebrew commentaries. This article introduces and illustrates those commentaries by taking one short passage from Averroes and seeing how it was subsequently interpreted. It argues that there was a Hebrew commentarial tradition in which later commentaries built upon earlier ones, which migrated with itinerant scholars. It also shows the influence of the Latin translation of Porphyry, chiefly that of Boethius, which differs from the paraphrase. And finally, it distinguishes the commentary of Judah Messer Leon (15th c. Italy) from its predecessors in its whole-scale adaption of Christian commentarial practices. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5010","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5010,"authors_free":[{"id":5747,"entry_id":5010,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":679,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Charles Manekin","free_first_name":"Charles","free_last_name":"Manekin","norm_person":{"id":679,"first_name":"Charles H.","last_name":"Manekin","full_name":"Charles H. Manekin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/133803554","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/112521012","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Charles H. Manekin"}}],"entry_title":"Porphyry\u2019s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Porphyry\u2019s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition"},"abstract":"Although most students during the Middle Ages began their study of the Organon with Porphyry\u2019s summary of the predicables in the Isagoge, Jewish students in Christian lands studied it mostly via Averroes\u2019 paraphrase or \u201cMiddle Commentary\u201d, since Porphyry\u2019s text was not translated into Hebrew. The popularity of Averroes\u2019 paraphrase was impressive; it is extant in over 80 Hebrew manuscripts, upon which there are thirteen extant Hebrew commentaries. This article introduces and illustrates those commentaries by taking one short passage from Averroes and seeing how it was subsequently interpreted. It argues that there was a Hebrew commentarial tradition in which later commentaries built upon earlier ones, which migrated with itinerant scholars. It also shows the influence of the Latin translation of Porphyry, chiefly that of Boethius, which differs from the paraphrase. And finally, it distinguishes the commentary of Judah Messer Leon (15th c. Italy) from its predecessors in its whole-scale adaption of Christian commentarial practices.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.12871\/978883339614917","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":55,"category_name":"Boethius","link":"bib?categories[]=Boethius"}],"authors":[{"id":679,"full_name":"Charles H. Manekin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5010,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Studia graeco-arabica","volume":"11","issue":"2","pages":"107\u2013124"}},"sort":["Porphyry\u2019s First Definition of Difference in the Hebrew Logical Tradition"]}
| Title | Problemi della tradizione a stampa del De substantia orbis di Averroè |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia, V Serie |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 559–580 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Giovanni Licata |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5052","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5052,"authors_free":[{"id":5802,"entry_id":5052,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1599,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Giovanni Licata","free_first_name":"Giovanni ","free_last_name":"Licata","norm_person":{"id":1599,"first_name":"Giovanni","last_name":"Licata","full_name":"Giovanni Licata","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1128655918","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/306437659","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Giovanni Licata"}}],"entry_title":"Problemi della tradizione a stampa del De substantia orbis di Averro\u00e8","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Problemi della tradizione a stampa del De substantia orbis di Averro\u00e8"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1599,"full_name":"Giovanni Licata","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5052,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia, V Serie","volume":"11","issue":"2","pages":"559\u2013580"}},"sort":["Problemi della tradizione a stampa del De substantia orbis di Averro\u00e8"]}
| Title | Providence and Seventeenth Century Attacks on Averroes |
| Type | Book Section |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2015 |
| Published in | Averroes’ Natural Philosophy and its Reception in the Latin West |
| Pages | 193–212 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Craig Martin |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5235","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5235,"authors_free":[{"id":6044,"entry_id":5235,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1480,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Craig Martin","free_first_name":"Craig","free_last_name":"Martin","norm_person":{"id":1480,"first_name":"Craig","last_name":"Martin","full_name":"Craig Martin","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/143043714","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/106785793","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Craig Martin"}}],"entry_title":"Providence and Seventeenth Century Attacks on Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Providence and Seventeenth Century Attacks on Averroes"},"abstract":"","btype":2,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1480,"full_name":"Craig Martin","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":{"id":5235,"section_of":5224,"pages":"193\u2013212","is_catalog":null,"book":{"id":5224,"bilderberg_idno":null,"dare_idno":null,"catalog_idno":null,"entry_type":"bibliography","type":4,"language":"no language selected","title":"Averroes\u2019 Natural Philosophy and its Reception in the Latin West","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","short_title":"","has_no_author":null,"volume":null,"date":"2015","edition_no":null,"free_date":null,"abstract":"","republication_of":0,"online_url":"","online_resources":null,"translation_of":"0","new_edition_of":"0","is_catalog":0,"in_bibliography":0,"is_inactive":0,"notes":null,"ti_url":"","doi_url":"","book":{"id":5224,"pubplace":"Leuven","publisher":"Leuven University Press","series":"Ancient and Medieval Philosophy, De Wulf-Mansion Centre, Series 1","volume":"50","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null}}},"article":null},"sort":["Providence and Seventeenth Century Attacks on Averroes"]}
| Title | Può un uomo generarsi nell’utero di una capra o di una cagna? Una quaestio di Urbano da Bologna nel commento alla Physica di Averroè |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | Noctua |
| Volume | X |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 46-105 |
| Categories | Averroism, Latin Averroism, Natural Philosophy, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Mario Loconsole |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In Latin Europe, the controversy over spontaneous generation of perfect animals – namely those whose breeding occurs through sexual reproduction – is received in different ways, varying from positions very close to Avicenna’s, as in the case of Pietro Pomponazzi, to interpretations that rather refer to Averroes’ perspective. To this ‘Averroist front’ undoubtedly belongs the figure of Urbano da Bologna, author of the Expositio commenti Averrois in VIII libros Physicorum – a work that can be defined a supercommentary to Averroes’ Physica – composed in Bologna around 1334. The present study aims to provide the complete transcription of a quaestio that is present in the work – but which was disputed according to its author also in public – as an example of the elaboration of the theme of spontaneous generation in the early 14th century. The text deals with many aspects of the problem, especially elaborating on the correspondence between each specific form and its appropriate matter, in the light of the lively debates of the time, and reveals a mature understanding of Aristotle’s natural philosophy and its Averroist interpretation. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5600","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5600,"authors_free":[{"id":6501,"entry_id":5600,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mario Loconsole","free_first_name":"Mario ","free_last_name":"Loconsole","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Pu\u00f2 un uomo generarsi nell\u2019utero di una capra o di una cagna? Una quaestio di Urbano da Bologna nel commento alla Physica di Averro\u00e8","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Pu\u00f2 un uomo generarsi nell\u2019utero di una capra o di una cagna? Una quaestio di Urbano da Bologna nel commento alla Physica di Averro\u00e8"},"abstract":"In Latin Europe, the controversy over spontaneous generation of perfect animals \u2013 namely those whose breeding occurs through sexual reproduction \u2013 is received in different ways, varying from positions very close to Avicenna\u2019s, as in the case of Pietro Pomponazzi, to interpretations that rather refer to Averroes\u2019 perspective. To this \u2018Averroist front\u2019 undoubtedly belongs the figure of Urbano da Bologna, author of the Expositio commenti Averrois in VIII libros Physicorum \u2013 a work that can be defined a supercommentary to Averroes\u2019 Physica \u2013 composed in Bologna around 1334. The present study aims to provide the complete transcription of a quaestio that is present in the work \u2013 but which was disputed according to its author also in public \u2013 as an example of the elaboration of the theme of spontaneous generation in the early 14th century. The text deals with many aspects of the problem, especially elaborating on the correspondence between each specific form and its appropriate matter, in the light of the lively debates of the time, and reveals a mature understanding of Aristotle\u2019s natural philosophy and its Averroist interpretation.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.14640\/NoctuaX2","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5600,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Noctua","volume":"X","issue":"1","pages":"46-105"}},"sort":["Pu\u00f2 un uomo generarsi nell\u2019utero di una capra o di una cagna? Una quaestio di Urbano da Bologna nel commento alla Physica di Averro\u00e8"]}
| Title | Questions of Methodology in Aristotle’s Zoology: A Medieval Perspective |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Journal of the History of Biology |
| Volume | 45 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 329–352 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Tradition and Reception, Commentary, Gersonides |
| Author(s) | Ahuva Gaziel |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| During the Middle Ages Aristotle’s treatises were accessible to intellectuals via translations and commentaries. Among his works on natural philosophy, the zoological books received relatively little scholarly attention, though several medieval commentators carefully studied Aristotle’s investigations of the animal kingdom. Averroes completed in 1169 a commentary on an Arabic translation of Aristotle’s Parts of Animals and Generation of Animals. In 1323 Gersonides completed his supercommentary on a Hebrew translation of Averroes’ commentary. This article examines how these two medieval commentators interpret the first book of Aristotle’s Parts of Animals, at the center of which stand methodological questions regarding the study of animals. Aristotle’s discussion of classification is presented by Averroes and Gersonides in light of an epistemological debate concerning the requisite method for scientific inquiries and discoveries. Sense perception is contrasted with rational reasoning, and ultimately a combined method is proposed, sense perception maintaining supremacy. These commentators outline a clear link between the systematic arrangement of animal species as offered by Aristotle, and his subsequent logical demonstrations which, according to them, form the core of biological investigations. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5313","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5313,"authors_free":[{"id":6144,"entry_id":5313,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ahuva Gaziel","free_first_name":"Ahuva","free_last_name":"Gaziel","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Questions of Methodology in Aristotle\u2019s Zoology: A Medieval Perspective","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Questions of Methodology in Aristotle\u2019s Zoology: A Medieval Perspective"},"abstract":"During the Middle Ages Aristotle\u2019s treatises were accessible to intellectuals via translations and commentaries. Among his works on natural philosophy, the zoological books received relatively little scholarly attention, though several medieval commentators carefully studied Aristotle\u2019s investigations of the animal kingdom. Averroes completed in 1169 a commentary on an Arabic translation of Aristotle\u2019s Parts of Animals and Generation of Animals. In 1323 Gersonides completed his supercommentary on a Hebrew translation of Averroes\u2019 commentary. This article examines how these two medieval commentators interpret the first book of Aristotle\u2019s Parts of Animals, at the center of which stand methodological questions regarding the study of animals. Aristotle\u2019s discussion of classification is presented by Averroes and Gersonides in light of an epistemological debate concerning the requisite method for scientific inquiries and discoveries. Sense perception is contrasted with rational reasoning, and ultimately a combined method is proposed, sense perception maintaining supremacy. These commentators outline a clear link between the systematic arrangement of animal species as offered by Aristotle, and his subsequent logical demonstrations which, according to them, form the core of biological investigations.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1007\/s10739-011-9284-6","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":62,"category_name":"Gersonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Gersonides"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5313,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of the History of Biology","volume":"45","issue":"2 ","pages":"329\u2013352"}},"sort":["Questions of Methodology in Aristotle\u2019s Zoology: A Medieval Perspective"]}
| Title | Raison et démonstration. Les commentaires médiévaux sur les Seconds Analytiques |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2013 |
| Publication Place | Turnhout |
| Publisher | Brepolis |
| Series | Studia artistarum |
| Volume | 40 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Joël Biard |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Durant au moins deux millénaires, les Seconds Analytiques d’Aristote ont joué un rôle de premier plan dans la réflexion sur la science, ses objets et ses procédures. On a souvent retenu la structure syllogistique comme élément essentiel de cette conception. Mais le traité examine aussi de nombreuses autres questions relevant de la philosophie des sciences : statut des principes, nature des prémisses, fonction du moyen terme, rapport entre causalité réelle et causalité épistémique, diversité des types de démonstration, rôle des définitions, confrontation du modèle ainsi élaboré avec les mathématiques. Chaque fois, c’est toute une série de nouveaux problèmes qui surgit à partir ou à l’occasion du texte aristotélicien, amplifiés par la suite des exégèses auxquelles celui-ci a donné lieu. L’objet de cet ouvrage collectif est d’étudier quelques moments majeurs des interprétations et usages des Seconds Analytiques. Il n’entre pas dans les débats contemporains concernant le texte même d’Aristote et n’examine que de façon marginale les premiers commentaires grecs ; il a pour objet premier leur transmission ultérieure jusque dans l’occident médiéval. Dans ce parcours, il prend en compte le monde byzantin et le monde arabe. Une grande partie de l’ouvrage est ensuite consacrée aux XIIIe et XIVe siècles en Occident médiéval, mais on trouvera aussi quelques études examinant la place des Seconds Analytiques chez quelques humanistes italiens ou dans le nominalisme du début du XVIe siècle. Ce volume propose ainsi une histoire de la transmission et de l’interprétation de ce texte, tout en visant à éclairer quelques questions importantes pour la nature de la démonstration et de la connaissance scientifique. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2046","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2046,"authors_free":[{"id":2489,"entry_id":2046,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1302,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":2,"role_name":"editor"},"free_name":"Jo\u00ebl Biard","free_first_name":"Jo\u00ebl","free_last_name":"Biard","norm_person":{"id":1302,"first_name":"Jo\u00ebl","last_name":"Biard","full_name":"Jo\u00ebl Biard","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/111891027","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/85246900","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jo\u00ebl Biard"}}],"entry_title":"Raison et d\u00e9monstration. Les commentaires m\u00e9di\u00e9vaux sur les Seconds Analytiques","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Raison et d\u00e9monstration. Les commentaires m\u00e9di\u00e9vaux sur les Seconds Analytiques"},"abstract":"Durant au moins deux mill\u00e9naires, les Seconds Analytiques d\u2019Aristote ont jou\u00e9 un r\u00f4le de premier plan dans la r\u00e9flexion sur la science, ses objets et ses proc\u00e9dures. On a souvent retenu la structure syllogistique comme \u00e9l\u00e9ment essentiel de cette conception. Mais le trait\u00e9 examine aussi de nombreuses autres questions relevant de la philosophie des sciences : statut des principes, nature des pr\u00e9misses, fonction du moyen terme, rapport entre causalit\u00e9 r\u00e9elle et causalit\u00e9 \u00e9pist\u00e9mique, diversit\u00e9 des types de d\u00e9monstration, r\u00f4le des d\u00e9finitions, confrontation du mod\u00e8le ainsi \u00e9labor\u00e9 avec les math\u00e9matiques. Chaque fois, c\u2019est toute une s\u00e9rie de nouveaux probl\u00e8mes qui surgit \u00e0 partir ou \u00e0 l\u2019occasion du texte aristot\u00e9licien, amplifi\u00e9s par la suite des ex\u00e9g\u00e8ses auxquelles celui-ci a donn\u00e9 lieu.\r\n\r\nL\u2019objet de cet ouvrage collectif est d\u2019\u00e9tudier quelques moments majeurs des interpr\u00e9tations et usages des Seconds Analytiques. Il n\u2019entre pas dans les d\u00e9bats contemporains concernant le texte m\u00eame d\u2019Aristote et n\u2019examine que de fa\u00e7on marginale les premiers commentaires grecs ; il a pour objet premier leur transmission ult\u00e9rieure jusque dans l\u2019occident m\u00e9di\u00e9val. Dans ce parcours, il prend en compte le monde byzantin et le monde arabe. Une grande partie de l\u2019ouvrage est ensuite consacr\u00e9e aux XIIIe et XIVe si\u00e8cles en Occident m\u00e9di\u00e9val, mais on trouvera aussi quelques \u00e9tudes examinant la place des Seconds Analytiques chez quelques humanistes italiens ou dans le nominalisme du d\u00e9but du XVIe si\u00e8cle.\r\nCe volume propose ainsi une histoire de la transmission et de l\u2019interpr\u00e9tation de ce texte, tout en visant \u00e0 \u00e9clairer quelques questions importantes pour la nature de la d\u00e9monstration et de la connaissance scientifique.","btype":1,"date":"2013","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"http:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.1484\/M.SA-EB.6.09070802050003050504040002","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1302,"full_name":"Jo\u00ebl Biard","role":2}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":2046,"pubplace":"Turnhout","publisher":"Brepolis","series":"Studia artistarum","volume":"40","edition_no":"","valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Raison et d\u00e9monstration. Les commentaires m\u00e9di\u00e9vaux sur les Seconds Analytiques"]}