| Title | Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Indonesian |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 71-92 |
| Categories | Logic, Method, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Raha Bistara |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article shows how the demonstrative method (burhani) is more superior to rhetoric (khatabbi) and dialectic method (jaddali), the use of the demonstrative method is based on the utilization of the mind. Ibn Rusyd stated that the demonstrative method is considered the right method for seeking the answers above the questions on the subject of religion and philosophy. However, it is not amazed Ibn Rusyd used a demonstrative method to criticize the Mutakallimun Ash’ariyah and his followers especially Imam Al-Ghazali. Ibn Rusyd also criticized Ibn sina and Zahiriyah group with the method they used. There was confusion for the answer to who they presented regarding religious and philosophical problems. While there were many problems with their views especially in their books. This article used the library research method which uses literature either in the form of books, or notes from previous research reports. While the sources of this research there are two sources as primary source and secondary sources. This result of this research revealed that Ibn Rushd’s philosophy critical method from authentic sources related to the problem. Although, by the use of various sources used, it is hoped there will be a new finding related to demonstrative method initiated by Ibn Rushd in refuting the arguments of rhetorical and dialectical groups which are not deep, explicit, and simple. As well as providing the new formulas that are fresher and more varied concerning the answer about the problems of religion and philosophy. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5769","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5769,"authors_free":[{"id":6682,"entry_id":5769,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Raha Bistara","free_first_name":"Raha ","free_last_name":"Bistara","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Keunggulan Metode Demonstratif Terhadap Metode Retorika Dan Dialektika: Menguak Metode Kritik Filsafat Ibn Rusyd"},"abstract":"This article shows how the demonstrative method (burhani) is more superior to rhetoric (khatabbi) and dialectic method (jaddali), the use of the demonstrative method is based on the utilization of the mind. Ibn Rusyd stated that the demonstrative method is considered the right method for seeking the answers above the questions on the subject of religion and philosophy. However, it is not amazed Ibn Rusyd used a demonstrative method to criticize the Mutakallimun Ash\u2019ariyah and his followers especially Imam Al-Ghazali. Ibn Rusyd also criticized Ibn sina and Zahiriyah group with the method they used. There was confusion for the answer to who they presented regarding religious and philosophical problems. While there were many problems with their views especially in their books. This article used the library research method which uses literature either in the form of books, or notes from previous research reports. While the sources of this research there are two sources as primary source and secondary sources. This result of this research revealed that Ibn Rushd\u2019s philosophy critical method from authentic sources related to the problem. Although, by the use of various sources used, it is hoped there will be a new finding related to demonstrative method initiated by Ibn Rushd in refuting the arguments of rhetorical and dialectical groups which are not deep, explicit, and simple. As well as providing the new formulas that are fresher and more varied concerning the answer about the problems of religion and philosophy. ","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Indonesian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":72,"category_name":"Method","link":"bib?categories[]=Method"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5769,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama","volume":"16","issue":"2","pages":"71-92"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Warrior Women in Ibn Rushd’s Commentary on Plato’s Republic: Mythico-Barbarian Geography in the Case for Female Guardians, an Unsolved Passage |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Al Masaq: Islam and the Medieval Mediterranean |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 314-335 |
| Categories | Commentary, Plato, Politics |
| Author(s) | Tineke Melkebeek |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In his commentary on Plato’s Republic, Ibn Rushd (Averroes) discusses the case for female guardians. Besides following Socrates’s argument for female warriors, which cites the efficiency of female guard dogs, Ibn Rushd introduces an additional argument: that the female capacity for warfare is evident from the inhabitants of certain regions. Unfortunately, the precise formulation of the regions or groups he intends to mention is obscure in the existing manuscripts. Rosenthal translates “the inhabitants of deserts and frontier villages”, Lerner’s translation says “the inhabitants of deserts and the City of Women”. This article aims to analyse these and other translations of this enigmatic passage, which has not yet been the subject of study. Concerning the second region mentioned, it seems that Ibn Rushd could be indicating Northern Spain, but he might also have been alluding to the legendary places at the coldest margins of the then-known world. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5767","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5767,"authors_free":[{"id":6680,"entry_id":5767,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Tineke Melkebeek","free_first_name":"Tineke ","free_last_name":"Melkebeek","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Warrior Women in Ibn Rushd\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic: Mythico-Barbarian Geography in the Case for Female Guardians, an Unsolved Passage","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Warrior Women in Ibn Rushd\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic: Mythico-Barbarian Geography in the Case for Female Guardians, an Unsolved Passage"},"abstract":"In his commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic, Ibn Rushd (Averroes) discusses the case for female guardians. Besides following Socrates\u2019s argument for female warriors, which cites the efficiency of female guard dogs, Ibn Rushd introduces an additional argument: that the female capacity for warfare is evident from the inhabitants of certain regions. Unfortunately, the precise formulation of the regions or groups he intends to mention is obscure in the existing manuscripts. Rosenthal translates \u201cthe inhabitants of deserts and frontier villages\u201d, Lerner\u2019s translation says \u201cthe inhabitants of deserts and the City of Women\u201d. This article aims to analyse these and other translations of this enigmatic passage, which has not yet been the subject of study. Concerning the second region mentioned, it seems that Ibn Rushd could be indicating Northern Spain, but he might also have been alluding to the legendary places at the coldest margins of the then-known world.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09503110.2022.2114065","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5767,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al Masaq: Islam and the Medieval Mediterranean","volume":"34 ","issue":"3","pages":"314-335"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Epistemic Paternalism, Averroes, and Religious Knowledge |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Philosophy East and West |
| Volume | 72 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 960-972 |
| Categories | Epistemology, Theology |
| Author(s) | Kirk Lougheed , Joshua Lee Harris |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The distinction between knowledge by demonstration and knowledge by imagination in Averroes offers a helpful explanation as to why epistemic paternalism is permitted in at least some religious cases. In certain religious settings the stakes may be so high that partial knowledge by imagination is indeed better than confusion resulting from a demonstration. While it is true this defense is not purely epistemic, many are in good company as it turns out that almost no cases of epistemic paternalism are purely epistemic. Finally, an upshot of their view is that it nicely explains why their defense of epistemic paternalism might apply to other domains of great importance but not to trivial matters. Much more remains to be said about the permissibility of epistemic paternalism more generally, and about its permissibility in religious cases in particular. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5795","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5795,"authors_free":[{"id":6715,"entry_id":5795,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1683,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Kirk Lougheed","free_first_name":"Kirk ","free_last_name":"Lougheed","norm_person":{"id":1683,"first_name":"Kirk","last_name":"Lougheed","full_name":"Kirk Lougheed","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1080701206","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Kirk Lougheed"}},{"id":6716,"entry_id":5795,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1901,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Joshua Lee Harris","free_first_name":"Joshua Lee ","free_last_name":"Harris","norm_person":{"id":1901,"first_name":"Joshua Lee ","last_name":"Harris","full_name":"Joshua Lee Harris","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1080676589","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Joshua Lee Harris"}}],"entry_title":"Epistemic Paternalism, Averroes, and Religious Knowledge","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Epistemic Paternalism, Averroes, and Religious Knowledge"},"abstract":"The distinction between knowledge by demonstration and knowledge by imagination in Averroes offers a helpful explanation as to why epistemic paternalism is permitted in at least some religious cases. In certain religious settings the stakes may be so high that partial knowledge by imagination is indeed better than confusion resulting from a demonstration. While it is true this defense is not purely epistemic, many are in good company as it turns out that almost no cases of epistemic paternalism are purely epistemic. Finally, an upshot of their view is that it nicely explains why their defense of epistemic paternalism might apply to other domains of great importance but not to trivial matters. Much more remains to be said about the permissibility of epistemic paternalism more generally, and about its permissibility in religious cases in particular.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":73,"category_name":"Epistemology","link":"bib?categories[]=Epistemology"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1683,"full_name":"Kirk Lougheed","role":1},{"id":1901,"full_name":"Joshua Lee Harris","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5795,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Philosophy East and West","volume":"72","issue":"4","pages":"960-972"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Does Each of Us Think Our Own Universal? An Averroean Challenge for (Aquinas and) Hervaeus Natalis |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | History of Philosophy Quarterly |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 339-354 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Psychology |
| Author(s) | Hamid Taieb |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This paper aims to address a problem faced by any philosopher who treats universals as intentional objects: in defending this thesis, aren't they committed to the view that each of us thinks an individuated universal, since each of us, when thinking of a universal, must have our own intentional object? This problem, which is mentioned by Brentano at the turn of the twentieth century, originated in the Middle Ages in debates initiated by Averroes about the nature of the intellect. It shows up in the later Aquinas, due to his theory of the verbum, which might be interpreted as a sort of intentional object, but it is solved without too much difficulty. It is later found in Hervaeus Natalis, who does accept intentional objects; in contrast to Aquinas, it is not clear that Hervaeus has a good solution to the problem. After first presenting the problem, this paper then turns to its medieval origins by analyzing its occurrence in Aquinas's criticism of Averroes. It then explains why Hervaeus has more difficulties than Aquinas in solving the problem. It concludes with a systematic reflection on the various possible solutions to the problem. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5805","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5805,"authors_free":[{"id":6726,"entry_id":5805,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1902,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hamid Taieb","free_first_name":"Hamid ","free_last_name":"Taieb","norm_person":{"id":1902,"first_name":"Hamid ","last_name":"Taieb","full_name":"Hamid Taieb","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1077921705","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Hamid Taieb"}}],"entry_title":"Does Each of Us Think Our Own Universal? An Averroean Challenge for (Aquinas and) Hervaeus Natalis","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Does Each of Us Think Our Own Universal? An Averroean Challenge for (Aquinas and) Hervaeus Natalis"},"abstract":"This paper aims to address a problem faced by any philosopher who treats universals as intentional objects: in defending this thesis, aren't they committed to the view that each of us thinks an individuated universal, since each of us, when thinking of a universal, must have our own intentional object? This problem, which is mentioned by Brentano at the turn of the twentieth century, originated in the Middle Ages in debates initiated by Averroes about the nature of the intellect. It shows up in the later Aquinas, due to his theory of the verbum, which might be interpreted as a sort of intentional object, but it is solved without too much difficulty. It is later found in Hervaeus Natalis, who does accept intentional objects; in contrast to Aquinas, it is not clear that Hervaeus has a good solution to the problem. After first presenting the problem, this paper then turns to its medieval origins by analyzing its occurrence in Aquinas's criticism of Averroes. It then explains why Hervaeus has more difficulties than Aquinas in solving the problem. It concludes with a systematic reflection on the various possible solutions to the problem.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.5406\/21521026.39.4.03","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"}],"authors":[{"id":1902,"full_name":"Hamid Taieb","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5805,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"History of Philosophy Quarterly","volume":"39","issue":"4","pages":"339-354"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Lecteurs arabes et latins de Thémistius au Moyen Âge: l’intellect et ses objets |
| Type | Article |
| Language | undefined |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Théologiques |
| Volume | 106 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 3-36 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Themistius, Aquinas, Aristotle, De anima, Intellect |
| Author(s) | Elisa Coda |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article examines one of the fundamental theses of Themistius in his paraphrase of Aristotle’s De anima, namely, the relationship between the intellect and its objects, as it appears in the reception of two readers of Themistius in the Middle Ages: Averroes and Thomas Aquinas. The comparison between these two philosophers suggests that the (neo)Platonic heritage present in the Themistian interpretation of the relation between the intellect and its objects was influential to a certain extent, but it produced in the two philosophers different considerations. A third reader, anonymous, is mentioned: a small treatise known as the Anonymous of Basel, written between 1308 and 1323, provides interesting testimony to the respective influence of the Themistian readings of Averroes and Thomas. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5804","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5804,"authors_free":[{"id":6725,"entry_id":5804,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1738,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Elisa Coda","free_first_name":"Elisa ","free_last_name":"Coda","norm_person":{"id":1738,"first_name":"Elisa","last_name":"Coda","full_name":"Elisa Coda","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1168595843","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Elisa Coda"}}],"entry_title":"Lecteurs arabes et latins de Th\u00e9mistius au Moyen \u00c2ge: l\u2019intellect et ses objets","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Lecteurs arabes et latins de Th\u00e9mistius au Moyen \u00c2ge: l\u2019intellect et ses objets"},"abstract":"This article examines one of the fundamental theses of Themistius in his paraphrase of Aristotle\u2019s De anima, namely, the relationship between the intellect and its objects, as it appears in the reception of two readers of Themistius in the Middle Ages: Averroes and Thomas Aquinas. The comparison between these two philosophers suggests that the (neo)Platonic heritage present in the Themistian interpretation of the relation between the intellect and its objects was influential to a certain extent, but it produced in the two philosophers different considerations. A third reader, anonymous, is mentioned: a small treatise known as the Anonymous of Basel, written between 1308 and 1323, provides interesting testimony to the respective influence of the Themistian readings of Averroes and Thomas.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3917\/rspt.1061.0003","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":16,"category_name":"Themistius","link":"bib?categories[]=Themistius"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"}],"authors":[{"id":1738,"full_name":"Elisa Coda","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5804,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des Sciences Philosophiques et Th\u00e9ologiques","volume":"106","issue":"1","pages":"3-36"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Natural Law and the Law of Moses in Jewish Averroistic Philosophy |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | The Journal of religion |
| Volume | 102 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 354-375 |
| Categories | Jewish Averroism, Tradition and Reception, Natural Philosophy |
| Author(s) | Shalom Sadik |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In order to understand the relationship between philosophy and religion, one of the major questions that must be explored is the relation between natural law and prophetic law. One of the main problems with modern research on this topic in the field of Jewish studies is that debate is relegated to the interpretation of only a few thinkers whose ideas are presumed to represent Judaism. The aim of this article is to begin remedying this issue by analyzing the relation between the Law of Moses and natural law as presented by four Jewish Averroists: Rabbis Isaac Albalag, Isaac Pulgar, Josef Ibn Kaspi, and Levi ben Abraham. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5806","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5806,"authors_free":[{"id":6727,"entry_id":5806,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Shalom Sadik","free_first_name":"Shalom ","free_last_name":"Sadik","norm_person":{"id":1903,"first_name":"Shalom ","last_name":"Sadik","full_name":"Shalom Sadik","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1044411279","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Shalom Sadik"}}],"entry_title":"Natural Law and the Law of Moses in Jewish Averroistic Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Natural Law and the Law of Moses in Jewish Averroistic Philosophy"},"abstract":"In order to understand the relationship between philosophy and religion, one of the major questions that must be explored is the relation between natural law and prophetic law. One of the main problems with modern research on this topic in the field of Jewish studies is that debate is relegated to the interpretation of only a few thinkers whose ideas are presumed to represent Judaism. The aim of this article is to begin remedying this issue by analyzing the relation between the Law of Moses and natural law as presented by four Jewish Averroists: Rabbis Isaac Albalag, Isaac Pulgar, Josef Ibn Kaspi, and Levi ben Abraham.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1086\/719817","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":8,"category_name":"Jewish Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Jewish Averroism"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"}],"authors":[{"id":1903,"full_name":"Shalom Sadik","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5806,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":" The Journal of religion","volume":"102","issue":"3","pages":"354-375"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Averroes and the Legacy of Dialogue |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Culture and dialogue |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 195-201 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Catarina Belo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5803","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5803,"authors_free":[{"id":6724,"entry_id":5803,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1254,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Catarina Belo","free_first_name":"Catarina ","free_last_name":"Belo","norm_person":{"id":1254,"first_name":"Catarina","last_name":"Belo","full_name":"Catarina Belo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132895374","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Catarina Belo"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and the Legacy of Dialogue","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and the Legacy of Dialogue"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.1163\/24683949-12340117","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1254,"full_name":"Catarina Belo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5803,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Culture and dialogue","volume":"10","issue":"2","pages":"195-201"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Revisiting Averroes' Influence On Western Philosophy |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | LWATI: A Journal of Contemporary Research |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 174-194 |
| Categories | Averroism, Latin Averroism, Tradition and Reception, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Anthony Raphael Etuk |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Better known as Averroes, Ibn Rushd remains one of the greatest Islamic philosophical geniuses of all times. The unparalleled inventiveness of his mind and the ―audacity‖ of his methods are evident in many of his innovative philosophical activities, which tremendous stirred the minds of his contemporaries in the Middle Ages. Perhaps only a few would deny the far-reaching impacts of his profound philosophical activities and ideas on Western philosophy. Prominent among these are his unique status as a paramount guide to Aristotle, based on his influential and massive commentaries on Aristotle, and his strong arguments for the compatibility of philosophy with religion. These and more, have since established the depth of his ideas and his lasting relevance in Western philosophy history. This paper undertakes an exposition of his philosophical activities, to identify the impacts of his enduring legacies on Western philosophy. The expository and hermeneutical methods of analysis are adopted. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5601","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5601,"authors_free":[{"id":6502,"entry_id":5601,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Anthony Raphael Etuk","free_first_name":"Anthony Raphael ","free_last_name":"Etuk","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Revisiting Averroes' Influence On Western Philosophy","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Revisiting Averroes' Influence On Western Philosophy"},"abstract":"Better known as Averroes, Ibn Rushd remains one of the greatest Islamic philosophical geniuses of all times. The unparalleled inventiveness of his mind and the \u2015audacity\u2016 of his methods are evident in many of his innovative philosophical activities, which tremendous \r\nstirred the minds of his contemporaries in the Middle Ages. Perhaps only a few would deny the far-reaching impacts of his profound philosophical activities and ideas on Western philosophy. Prominent among these are his unique status as a paramount guide to Aristotle, based on his influential and massive commentaries on Aristotle, and his \r\nstrong arguments for the compatibility of philosophy with religion. These and more, have since established the depth of his ideas and his lasting relevance in Western philosophy history. This paper undertakes an exposition of his philosophical activities, to identify the impacts of his enduring legacies on Western philosophy. The expository and hermeneutical methods of analysis are adopted. ","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.17265\/2159-5313\/2022.02.002","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5601,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"LWATI: A Journal of Contemporary Research ","volume":"19 ","issue":"1","pages":"174-194"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Dialectical views on metaphysics in Islam: Thoughts of Ibn Rushd and theologians |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | HTS Teologiese Studies / Theological Studies |
| Volume | 78 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1-6 |
| Categories | Theology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Aminullah Elhady |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This paper discusses the dialectical thoughts of Ibn Rushd and theologians on divine metaphysics. The discussion is based on the study of criticisms and dialogues on the theologians’ view on metaphysics. Three important points emerge: firstly, how Ibn Rushd presented the basis of his critical arguments; secondly, the process of Ibn Rushd’s methods of criticism on the theologians’ metaphysical reasons and lastly, the content of Ibn Rushd’s criticisms of the theologians’ metaphysical reason. This paper provides a detailed description of the themes as accurate and comprehensive ways to provide a basis of Ibn Rushd’s criticism. Contribution: This study contributes to encouraging and changing the views of scholars of Islamic theology that Ibn Rushd, apart from being a philosopher, is also a critical thinker in the field of Islamic theology. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5768","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5768,"authors_free":[{"id":6681,"entry_id":5768,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Aminullah Elhady","free_first_name":"Aminullah ","free_last_name":"Elhady","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Dialectical views on metaphysics in Islam: Thoughts of Ibn Rushd and theologians","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Dialectical views on metaphysics in Islam: Thoughts of Ibn Rushd and theologians"},"abstract":"This paper discusses the dialectical thoughts of Ibn Rushd and theologians on divine metaphysics. The discussion is based on the study of criticisms and dialogues on the theologians\u2019 view on metaphysics. Three important points emerge: firstly, how Ibn Rushd presented the basis of his critical arguments; secondly, the process of Ibn Rushd\u2019s methods of criticism on the theologians\u2019 metaphysical reasons and lastly, the content of Ibn Rushd\u2019s criticisms of the theologians\u2019 metaphysical reason. This paper provides a detailed description of the themes as accurate and comprehensive ways to provide a basis of Ibn Rushd\u2019s criticism.\r\n\r\nContribution: This study contributes to encouraging and changing the views of scholars of Islamic theology that Ibn Rushd, apart from being a philosopher, is also a critical thinker in the field of Islamic theology.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4102\/hts.v78i4.7531","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5768,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"HTS Teologiese Studies \/ Theological Studies","volume":"78","issue":"4","pages":"1-6"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Gersonides as Commentator in the Light of his Supercommentary on Averroes's Epitome of the Physics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Revue des Études Juives |
| Volume | 181 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 185–222 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Gersonides, Commentary, Method |
| Author(s) | Esti Eisenmann |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The article analyzes Gersonides (1288-1344) as a commentator, through the lens of his supercommentary on Averroes’s Epitome of Aristotle’s Physics. In the first section of the article, we question the assumption that this work is indeed a supercommentary and explain why it may nevertheless be included in the genre. In the second section, the article provides examples of Gersonides’ exegetical procedure. Given that the supercommentary on the Epitome of the Physics was the first supercommentary Gersonides wrote, the analysis of Gersonides’ methods sheds light on his image as an exegete and can help us determine his objective in commenting on this text and the readership he envisaged. He seems to be adressing readers who were taking their first steps in Aristotle’s works on nature and to have endeavored to guide them in this field. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5386","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5386,"authors_free":[{"id":6238,"entry_id":5386,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Esti Eisenmann","free_first_name":"Esti","free_last_name":"Eisenmann","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Gersonides as Commentator in the Light of his Supercommentary on Averroes's Epitome of the Physics","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Gersonides as Commentator in the Light of his Supercommentary on Averroes's Epitome of the Physics"},"abstract":"The article analyzes Gersonides (1288-1344) as a commentator, through the lens of his supercommentary on Averroes\u2019s Epitome of Aristotle\u2019s Physics. In the first section of the article, we question the assumption that this work is indeed a supercommentary and explain why it may nevertheless be included in the genre. In the second section, the article provides examples of Gersonides\u2019 exegetical procedure. Given that the supercommentary on the Epitome of the Physics was the first supercommentary Gersonides wrote, the analysis of Gersonides\u2019 methods sheds light on his image as an exegete and can help us determine his objective in commenting on this text and the readership he envisaged. He seems to be adressing readers who were taking their first steps in Aristotle\u2019s works on nature and to have endeavored to guide them in this field.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.2143\/REJ.181.1.3290628","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":62,"category_name":"Gersonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Gersonides"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":72,"category_name":"Method","link":"bib?categories[]=Method"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5386,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revue des \u00c9tudes Juives","volume":"181","issue":"1-2","pages":"185\u2013222"}},"sort":[2022]}
| Title | Al-Farabi and Ibn Rushd on the Correlation between Philosophy and Religion |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2007 |
| Journal | Comparative Islamic Studies |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 247–253 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, Theology |
| Author(s) | Ainur D. Kurmanalieva |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1429","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1429,"authors_free":[{"id":1624,"entry_id":1429,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1337,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ainur D. Kurmanalieva","free_first_name":"Ainur D.","free_last_name":"Kurmanalieva","norm_person":{"id":1337,"first_name":"Ainur D.","last_name":"Kurmanalieva","full_name":"Ainur D. Kurmanalieva","short_ident":"AinKur","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ainur D. Kurmanalieva"}}],"entry_title":"Al-Farabi and Ibn Rushd on the Correlation between Philosophy and Religion","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Al-Farabi and Ibn Rushd on the Correlation between Philosophy and Religion"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2007","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1337,"full_name":"Ainur D. Kurmanalieva","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1429,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Comparative Islamic Studies","volume":"3","issue":"2","pages":"247\u2013253"}},"sort":["Al-Farabi and Ibn Rushd on the Correlation between Philosophy and Religion"]}
| Title | Al-Miklātī, a Twelfth Century Aš’arite Reader of Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 155–197 |
| Categories | Proceedings, Relation between Philosophy and Theology, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | Yamina Adouhane , Yamina Adouhane |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The aim of this article is to present a new witness of Averroes' reception in the Muslim world, in the years that immediately followed his death. Indeed Abū al-Ḥağğāğ al-Miklātī (d. 1237) is an Ašʿarite theologian, who was born in Fez. He is the author of a Quintessence of the Intellects in Response to Philosophers on the Science of Principles in which he aims at refuting the Peripatetic philosophers in their own field, using their own weapons. This article will first attempt to draw the portrait of this atypical theologian. It will then focus on showing that al-Miklātī – although he never mentions his name – is a reader of Averroes and in particular, of his Tahāfut al-Tahāfut, of which he makes various and unexpected uses. A close look at these uses will enable us to better define the nature of al-Miklātī's work. More importantly, this article will try to prove that al-Miklātī provides us with a key passage of Averroes' lost treatise On the Prime Mover. At the heart of the Rushdian criticism of Avicenna's “metaphysical” proof, this passage should throw new light on Averroes' precise understanding of this proof. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1757","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1757,"authors_free":[{"id":2027,"entry_id":1757,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1489,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yamina Adouhane","free_first_name":"Yamina","free_last_name":"Adouhane","norm_person":{"id":1489,"first_name":"Yamina","last_name":"Adouhane","full_name":"Yamina Adouhane","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/458146284502615332481","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yamina Adouhane"}},{"id":2028,"entry_id":1757,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1489,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yamina Adouhane","free_first_name":"Yamina","free_last_name":"Adouhane","norm_person":{"id":1489,"first_name":"Yamina","last_name":"Adouhane","full_name":"Yamina Adouhane","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/458146284502615332481","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yamina Adouhane"}}],"entry_title":"Al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b, a Twelfth Century A\u0161\u2019arite Reader of Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b, a Twelfth Century A\u0161\u2019arite Reader of Averroes"},"abstract":"The aim of this article is to present a new witness of Averroes' reception in the Muslim world, in the years that immediately followed his death. Indeed Ab\u016b al-\u1e24a\u011f\u011f\u0101\u011f al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b (d. 1237) is an A\u0161\u02bfarite theologian, who was born in Fez. He is the author of a Quintessence of the Intellects in Response to Philosophers on the Science of Principles in which he aims at refuting the Peripatetic philosophers in their own field, using their own weapons. This article will first attempt to draw the portrait of this atypical theologian. It will then focus on showing that al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b \u2013 although he never mentions his name \u2013 is a reader of Averroes and in particular, of his Tah\u0101fut al-Tah\u0101fut, of which he makes various and unexpected uses. A close look at these uses will enable us to better define the nature of al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b's work. More importantly, this article will try to prove that al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b provides us with a key passage of Averroes' lost treatise On the Prime Mover. At the heart of the Rushdian criticism of Avicenna's \u201cmetaphysical\u201d proof, this passage should throw new light on Averroes' precise understanding of this proof.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S095742391200001X","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":45,"category_name":"Proceedings","link":"bib?categories[]=Proceedings"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":1489,"full_name":"Yamina Adouhane","role":1},{"id":1489,"full_name":"Yamina Adouhane","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1757,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"22","issue":"2","pages":"155\u2013197"}},"sort":["Al-Mikl\u0101t\u012b, a Twelfth Century A\u0161\u2019arite Reader of Averroes"]}
| Title | Albert the Great as a Reader of Averroes: A Study of His Notion of the Celestial Soul in De caelo et mundo and Metaphysica |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
| Volume | 30 |
| Pages | 625–654 |
| Categories | Albert, Tradition and Reception, Cosmology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Adam Takahashi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5104","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5104,"authors_free":[{"id":5878,"entry_id":5104,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Adam Takahashi","free_first_name":"Adam","free_last_name":"Takahashi","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Albert the Great as a Reader of Averroes: A Study of His Notion of the Celestial Soul in De caelo et mundo and Metaphysica","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Albert the Great as a Reader of Averroes: A Study of His Notion of the Celestial Soul in De caelo et mundo and Metaphysica"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5104,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"30","issue":"","pages":"625\u2013654"}},"sort":["Albert the Great as a Reader of Averroes: A Study of His Notion of the Celestial Soul in De caelo et mundo and Metaphysica"]}
| Title | Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 89–102 |
| Categories | Ibn Bāǧǧa, Aquinas, Albert |
| Author(s) | Luis Xavier López-Farjeat |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In Albert’s De anima III, 3, chapters 6–11 there is a discussion on whether the human intellect is able to apprehend only forms abstracted from matter or whether it is possible for it to know something separated from magnitude. If the human intellect is able to understand separate forms, this would mean that some forms are not apprehended with phantasms and magnitude but by the conjunction of the possible intellect and the separate intellect. This matter is quite problematic since it is not clear enough whether separate forms are known through the perfect conjunction of the possible intellect and the agent intellect or by means of the agent intellect which acts both as efficient and formal cause of these forms. Here, I focus on chapter 8 where Albert criticizes Avempace’s doctrine of the intellect, and chapter 11 where he states a resolution to the problem, which is very close to that of Averroes. This exploration illustrates the complexity of the relationship between the philosophies of Albert and Averroes. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2015","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2015,"authors_free":[{"id":6121,"entry_id":2015,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1727,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","free_first_name":"Luis Xavier,","free_last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","norm_person":{"id":1727,"first_name":"Luis Xavier","last_name":"L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/103191773X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat"}}],"entry_title":"Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms"},"abstract":"In Albert\u2019s De anima III, 3, chapters 6\u201311 there is a discussion on whether the human intellect is able to apprehend only forms abstracted from matter or whether it is possible for it to know something separated from magnitude. If the human intellect is able to understand separate forms, this would mean that some forms are not apprehended with phantasms and magnitude but by the conjunction of the possible intellect and the separate intellect. This matter is quite problematic since it is not clear enough whether separate forms are known through the perfect conjunction of the possible intellect and the agent intellect or by means of the agent intellect which acts both as efficient and formal cause of these forms. Here, I focus on chapter 8 where Albert criticizes Avempace\u2019s doctrine of the intellect, and chapter 11 where he states a resolution to the problem, which is very close to that of Averroes. This exploration illustrates the complexity of the relationship between the philosophies of Albert and Averroes.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":17,"category_name":"Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a","link":"bib?categories[]=Ibn B\u0101\u01e7\u01e7a"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":6,"category_name":"Albert","link":"bib?categories[]=Albert"}],"authors":[{"id":1727,"full_name":"Luis Xavier L\u00f3pez-Farjeat","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2015,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association","volume":"86","issue":"2","pages":"89\u2013102"}},"sort":["Albert the Great between Avempace and Averroes on the Knowledge of Separate Forms"]}
| Title | Alfonso X „the Wise“: the last Almohad caliph? |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2009 |
| Journal | Medieval Encounters |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 2-4 |
| Pages | 175-198 |
| Categories | Politics, Science |
| Author(s) | Maribel Fierro |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5309","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5309,"authors_free":[{"id":6139,"entry_id":5309,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":766,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Maribel Fierro","free_first_name":"Maribel","free_last_name":"Fierro","norm_person":{"id":766,"first_name":"Maribel","last_name":"Fierro","full_name":"Maribel Fierro","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1054572747","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/59118692","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd1054572747.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Maribel Fierro"}}],"entry_title":"Alfonso X \u201ethe Wise\u201c: the last Almohad caliph?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Alfonso X \u201ethe Wise\u201c: the last Almohad caliph?"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":56,"category_name":"Science","link":"bib?categories[]=Science"}],"authors":[{"id":766,"full_name":"Maribel Fierro","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5309,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Medieval Encounters","volume":"15","issue":"2-4","pages":"175-198"}},"sort":["Alfonso X \u201ethe Wise\u201c: the last Almohad caliph?"]}
| Title | Allegorical Interpretation of the Role of Philosophy in the Discourse of Philo and Ibn Rushd |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Al-Masāq |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 253–264 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Shuhaimi M. Bin Haji Ishak |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Instead of dismissing traditional mythology and poetry as heresies, Greek philosophy introduced a methodology of understanding known as allegory. Philo of Alexandria (20 BC-50 AD) was one of the first to employ allegory for understanding religious scriptures whose writings survived in the Christian traditions. In the Arab world, the philosopher Ibn Rushd (520-595/1126-1198) initiated the same method of commentary with his demonstration of the essential harmony between philosophy properly understood and scripture properly interpreted. This essay posits that Greek philosophy laid down a common tool for understanding the scriptures that exist in the Christian and Muslim traditions. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1762","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1762,"authors_free":[{"id":2033,"entry_id":1762,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1496,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Shuhaimi M. Bin Haji Ishak","free_first_name":"Shuhaimi M.","free_last_name":"Bin Haji Ishak","norm_person":{"id":1496,"first_name":"Shuhaimi M.","last_name":"Bin Haji Ishak","full_name":"Shuhaimi M. Bin Haji Ishak","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1038449014","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/305147204","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Shuhaimi M. Bin Haji Ishak"}}],"entry_title":"Allegorical Interpretation of the Role of Philosophy in the Discourse of Philo and Ibn Rushd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Allegorical Interpretation of the Role of Philosophy in the Discourse of Philo and Ibn Rushd"},"abstract":"Instead of dismissing traditional mythology and poetry as heresies, Greek philosophy introduced a methodology of understanding known as allegory. Philo of Alexandria (20 BC-50 AD) was one of the first to employ allegory for understanding religious scriptures whose writings survived in the Christian traditions. In the Arab world, the philosopher Ibn Rushd (520-595\/1126-1198) initiated the same method of commentary with his demonstration of the essential harmony between philosophy properly understood and scripture properly interpreted. This essay posits that Greek philosophy laid down a common tool for understanding the scriptures that exist in the Christian and Muslim traditions.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1080\/09503110.2012.727656","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1496,"full_name":"Shuhaimi M. Bin Haji Ishak","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1762,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Mas\u0101q","volume":"24","issue":"3","pages":"253\u2013264"}},"sort":["Allegorical Interpretation of the Role of Philosophy in the Discourse of Philo and Ibn Rushd"]}
| Title | Alternatives to Alternatives: Approaches to Aristotle's Arguments per impossibile |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2002 |
| Journal | Vivarium |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 137-173 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Taneli Kukkonen |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/41963679 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5750","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5750,"authors_free":[{"id":6659,"entry_id":5750,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":828,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","free_first_name":"Taneli ","free_last_name":"Kukkonen","norm_person":{"id":828,"first_name":"Taneli","last_name":"Kukkonen","full_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1064756859","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/242146822498007382889","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Taneli Kukkonen"}}],"entry_title":"Alternatives to Alternatives: Approaches to Aristotle's Arguments per impossibile","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Alternatives to Alternatives: Approaches to Aristotle's Arguments per impossibile"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2002","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/41963679","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":828,"full_name":"Taneli Kukkonen","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5750,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Vivarium","volume":"40","issue":"2","pages":"137-173"}},"sort":["Alternatives to Alternatives: Approaches to Aristotle's Arguments per impossibile"]}
| Title | An Abstractionist Correction of Avicenna's Theory of Intentionality in the Early Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | Acta Philosophica |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 405-420 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Avicenna |
| Author(s) | Francisco Romero Carasquillo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This paper offers an account of Averroes’ early doctrine of the internal senses with special reference to the role that intentionality plays in internal sense cognition. The author points out that, whereas for Avicenna an “intention” is the object of a specific faculty, for Averroes it is the formal aspect at any level of internal-sense cognition. This interpretation is required by the need to find coherence among those passages in Averroes’ Epitome de Parva naturalia that ascribe the joining of images and intentions to both the cogitative and memorative faculties. Consequently, Averroes’ account is hopelessly incoherent unless one interprets him as departing from, and indeed revising, the Avicennian doctrine of intentionality along more a faithful Aristotelian-abstractionist framework. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2043","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2043,"authors_free":[{"id":2485,"entry_id":2043,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1620,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Francisco Romero Carasquillo","free_first_name":"Francisco","free_last_name":"Romero Carasquillo","norm_person":{"id":1620,"first_name":"Francisco","last_name":"Romero Carasquillo","full_name":"Francisco Romero Carasquillo","short_ident":"FraCar","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Francisco Romero Carasquillo"}}],"entry_title":"An Abstractionist Correction of Avicenna's Theory of Intentionality in the Early Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"An Abstractionist Correction of Avicenna's Theory of Intentionality in the Early Averroes"},"abstract":"This paper offers an account of Averroes\u2019 early doctrine of the internal senses with special reference to the role that intentionality plays in internal sense cognition. The author points out that, whereas for Avicenna an \u201cintention\u201d is the object of a specific faculty, for Averroes it is the formal aspect at any level of internal-sense cognition. This interpretation is required by the need to find coherence among those passages in Averroes\u2019 Epitome de Parva naturalia that ascribe the joining of images and intentions to both the cogitative and memorative faculties. Consequently, Averroes\u2019 account is hopelessly incoherent unless one interprets him as departing from, and indeed revising, the Avicennian doctrine of intentionality along more a faithful Aristotelian-abstractionist framework.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"}],"authors":[{"id":1620,"full_name":"Francisco Romero Carasquillo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2043,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Acta Philosophica","volume":"20","issue":"2","pages":"405-420"}},"sort":["An Abstractionist Correction of Avicenna's Theory of Intentionality in the Early Averroes"]}
| Title | An Essay Review of In the Age of Averroes: Arabic Philosophy in the Sixth/Twelfth Century |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Ilahiyat Studies. A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 117–127 |
| Categories | Review |
| Author(s) | Jules Louis Janssens |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This volume concludes a series of three books devoted to Arabic philosophy. The first volume, published in 2007, addressed the sources and the reception of classical Arabic philosophy, and the second volume considered Arabic philosophy in the fourth/tenth century. It is immediately striking that the eleventh century, which, in line with the project, undoubtedly had to be qualified as the age of Ibn Sīnā, has been skipped. At first sight, there seems to be little philosophy during this time besides Ibn Sīnā himself and his so-called immediate disciples. Among the latter, however, one detects important differences in the way they address their master's legacy. Moreover, the eleventh century is the period in which Ibn Sīnā's philosophy entered Ashʿarite theology, perhaps already in al-Juwaynī's thought and certainly in al-Ghazālī's. Much of what comes to the fore in the present volume results from or has some basis in these facts. Let me add that in Muslim Andalusia during this century, one finds such a major thinker as Ibn Ḥazm, who, although above all a theologian, considered philosophical ideas and, inter alia, refers to al-Kindī. Hence, it is regrettable that no attention has been paid to this period. This said, the project as such has offered many new perspectives regarding classical Arabic philosophy, and the present volume is no exception. In particular, this volume shows the vivacity of philosophy, especially in Ibn Sīnā's view, in the twelfth century. As Peter Adamson, the editor, states in the introduction, the twelfth century may be characterized as a second formative period. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1634","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1634,"authors_free":[{"id":1889,"entry_id":1634,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":655,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jules Louis Janssens","free_first_name":"Jules Louis","free_last_name":"Janssens","norm_person":{"id":655,"first_name":"Jules","last_name":"Janssens","full_name":"Jules Janssens","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139312471","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/81614","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd139312471.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jules Janssens"}}],"entry_title":"An Essay Review of In the Age of Averroes: Arabic Philosophy in the Sixth\/Twelfth Century","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"An Essay Review of In the Age of Averroes: Arabic Philosophy in the Sixth\/Twelfth Century"},"abstract":"This volume concludes a series of three books devoted to Arabic philosophy. The first volume, published in 2007, addressed the sources and the reception of classical Arabic philosophy, and the second volume considered Arabic philosophy in the fourth\/tenth century. It is immediately striking that the eleventh century, which, in line with the project, undoubtedly had to be qualified as the age of Ibn S\u012bn\u0101, has been skipped. At first sight, there seems to be little philosophy during this time besides Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 himself and his so-called immediate disciples. Among the latter, however, one detects important differences in the way they address their master's legacy. Moreover, the eleventh century is the period in which Ibn S\u012bn\u0101's philosophy entered Ash\u02bfarite theology, perhaps already in al-Juwayn\u012b's thought and certainly in al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b's. Much of what comes to the fore in the present volume results from or has some basis in these facts. Let me add that in Muslim Andalusia during this century, one finds such a major thinker as Ibn \u1e24azm, who, although above all a theologian, considered philosophical ideas and, inter alia, refers to al-Kind\u012b. Hence, it is regrettable that no attention has been paid to this period. This said, the project as such has offered many new perspectives regarding classical Arabic philosophy, and the present volume is no exception. In particular, this volume shows the vivacity of philosophy, especially in Ibn S\u012bn\u0101's view, in the twelfth century. As Peter Adamson, the editor, states in the introduction, the twelfth century may be characterized as a second formative period.","btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":49,"category_name":"Review","link":"bib?categories[]=Review"}],"authors":[{"id":655,"full_name":"Jules Janssens","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1634,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ilahiyat Studies. A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies","volume":"3","issue":"1","pages":"117\u2013127"}},"sort":["An Essay Review of In the Age of Averroes: Arabic Philosophy in the Sixth\/Twelfth Century"]}
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5460","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5460,"authors_free":[{"id":6324,"entry_id":5460,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Tomoaki Shinoda","free_first_name":"Tomoaki","free_last_name":"Shinoda","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Animosity against those \"drowned in debt\" : an analysis of legal texts in the Mar\u012bnid period","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Animosity against those \"drowned in debt\" : an analysis of legal texts in the Mar\u012bnid period"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5460,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hesp\u00e9ris-Tamuda","volume":"57","issue":"1","pages":"301-323"}},"sort":["Animosity against those \"drowned in debt\" : an analysis of legal texts in the Mar\u012bnid period"]}