| Title | The Iberian earthquake(s) of 1169-1184 according to Ibn Rushd (Averroes) and others |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Seismological Research Letters |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 2285-2292 |
| Categories | Natural Philosophy |
| Author(s) | David J. Wasserstein |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Ibn Rushd (Averroes) (1126-1198), the famous Muslim philosopher, reported an earthquake in the region of Cordoba (Spain) in the twelfth century. The information in his reports is self-contradictory. We have several other reports of the same event, which are themselves not always very clear. I am now attempting to clarify the problems and offer an analysis of the available information. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5569","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5569,"authors_free":[{"id":6463,"entry_id":5569,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1848,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"David J. Wasserstein","free_first_name":"David J.","free_last_name":"Wasserstein","norm_person":{"id":1848,"first_name":"David J. ","last_name":"Wasserstein","full_name":"David J. Wasserstein","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1089175388","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=David J. Wasserstein"}}],"entry_title":"The Iberian earthquake(s) of 1169-1184 according to Ibn Rushd (Averroes) and others","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Iberian earthquake(s) of 1169-1184 according to Ibn Rushd (Averroes) and others"},"abstract":"Ibn Rushd (Averroes) (1126-1198), the famous Muslim philosopher, reported an earthquake in the region of Cordoba (Spain) in the twelfth century. The information in his reports is self-contradictory. We have several other reports of the same event, which are themselves not always very clear. I am now attempting to clarify the problems and offer an analysis of the available information.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1785\/0220180359","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"}],"authors":[{"id":1848,"full_name":"David J. Wasserstein","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5569,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Seismological Research Letters","volume":"90","issue":"6","pages":"2285-2292"}},"sort":[2019]}
| This article examines Andrea di Bonaiuto’s image of Averroes in the Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Spanish Chapel, Florence: 1365–69), explored alongside Bonaiuto’s primary visual source, Lippo Memmi’s panel painting, Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Pisa, c. 1323–30), and Dante’s Commedia. I argue that Bonaiuto’s ico-nography, developed within a Dominican context, is unique to the Spanish Chapel Triumph because it propagates Averroes as both a heterodox philosopher and a heretical Muslim precisely at a time when the Arab philosopher was acclaimed as the Great Commentator. Through comparative analysis, I demonstrate that Bonaiuto makes significant modifications to Memmi’s Triumph, the panel painting which first establishes an Aquinas-Averroes iconographic formula created to uphold the orthodoxy of Thomistic Aristotelianism by casting Averroes into a contemptible position, a formula also utilised by Benozzo Gozzoli in a later Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Pisa, c. 1470–75). I argue that Memmi’s image of Averroes can be read as a Dominican comment on the heterodoxy of Arabic Aristotelianism in spite of its widespread reception into Latin scholasticism. This feature is further developed by Bonaiuto who presents Averroes as an indolent philosopher and in a departure from Memmi’s formula, as a heretical Muslim. Such a reading is further elucidated when Bonaiuto’s Triumph is considered alongside Dante’s literary treatment of Arabic philosophers, the Prophet Muhammad, and Christian heresy in the Commedia, ultimately revealing that the reception of Ar-abic philosophers is entangled with Islam in a far more complex and ambiguous manner than once considered. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5572","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5572,"authors_free":[{"id":6466,"entry_id":5572,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Shazia Jagot","free_first_name":"Shazia","free_last_name":"Jagot","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Averroes, Islam, and Heterodoxy in the Spanish Chapel Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes, Islam, and Heterodoxy in the Spanish Chapel Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas"},"abstract":"This article examines Andrea di Bonaiuto\u2019s image of Averroes in the Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Spanish Chapel, Florence: 1365\u201369), explored alongside Bonaiuto\u2019s primary visual source, Lippo Memmi\u2019s panel painting, Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Pisa, c. 1323\u201330), and Dante\u2019s Commedia. I argue that Bonaiuto\u2019s ico-nography, developed within a Dominican context, is unique to the Spanish Chapel Triumph because it propagates Averroes as both a heterodox philosopher and a heretical Muslim precisely at a time when the Arab philosopher was acclaimed as the Great Commentator. Through comparative analysis, I demonstrate that Bonaiuto makes significant modifications to Memmi\u2019s Triumph, the panel painting which first establishes an Aquinas-Averroes iconographic formula created to uphold the orthodoxy of Thomistic Aristotelianism by casting Averroes into a contemptible position, a formula also utilised by Benozzo Gozzoli in a later Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Pisa, c. 1470\u201375). I argue that Memmi\u2019s image of Averroes can be read as a Dominican comment on the heterodoxy of Arabic Aristotelianism in spite of its widespread reception into Latin scholasticism. This feature is further developed by Bonaiuto who presents Averroes as an indolent philosopher and in a departure from Memmi\u2019s formula, as a heretical Muslim. Such a reading is further elucidated when Bonaiuto\u2019s Triumph is considered alongside Dante\u2019s literary treatment of Arabic philosophers, the Prophet Muhammad, and Christian heresy in the Commedia, ultimately revealing that the reception of Ar-abic philosophers is entangled with Islam in a far more complex and ambiguous manner than once considered.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13130\/interfaces-06-02","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5572,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Interfaces, A Journal of Medieval European Literatures","volume":"6","issue":"","pages":"7-32"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Averroes and Maimonides on Equivocal Terms in the Qur’ân and the Torah |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | The Muslim World |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 615–626 |
| Categories | Maimonides, Theology |
| Author(s) | Terence J. Kleven |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This essay is a brief exploration of the Scriptural exegesis of the most noteworthy sons of Cordoba, Averroes or Ibn Rushd (1126-1198) and Moses Maimonides or Rambam (1135-1204). We will examine the manner of their exegesis of the Scriptural texts, the Qur'an and the Torah, of their respective religious communities. Although Averroes is nine years older than Maimonides, they are near contemporaries. We do not know whether in their youths these Cordobans ever met; they will emerge as two of the most renowned scholars and judges of their communities. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5095","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5095,"authors_free":[{"id":5868,"entry_id":5095,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1332,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Terence J. Kleven","free_first_name":"Terence J. ","free_last_name":"Kleven","norm_person":{"id":1332,"first_name":"Terence J.","last_name":"Kleven","full_name":"Terence J. Kleven","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1050705157","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/308213722","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Terence J. Kleven"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and Maimonides on Equivocal Terms in the Qur\u2019\u00e2n and the Torah","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and Maimonides on Equivocal Terms in the Qur\u2019\u00e2n and the Torah"},"abstract":"This essay is a brief exploration of the Scriptural exegesis of the most noteworthy sons of Cordoba, Averroes or Ibn Rushd (1126-1198) and Moses Maimonides or Rambam (1135-1204). We will examine the manner of their exegesis of the Scriptural texts, the Qur'an and the Torah, of their respective religious communities. Although Averroes is nine years older than Maimonides, they are near contemporaries. We do not know whether in their youths these Cordobans ever met; they will emerge as two of the most renowned scholars and judges of their communities.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":" https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/muwo.12313","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":9,"category_name":"Maimonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Maimonides"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1332,"full_name":"Terence J. Kleven","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5095,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Muslim World","volume":"109","issue":"4","pages":"615\u2013626"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Ibn Rushd’s the Decisive Treatise (1126–98) is widely acknowledged as an important text for understanding his legal ideas, with some scholars describing this text as a legal opinion (fatwa) issued for the Malikite jurists of that period. Contrastingly, I argue that the Decisive Treatise forms part of Ibn Rushd’s broader vision for political reform, and should thus be reconsidered as an important text for understanding his ideas on political authority. Whilst Ibn Rushd persisted in advancing the Almohad policy of reform, by calling on the religious scholars who occupied an important space in Almohad society to relinquish their narrow positions on how to understand and interpret Islamic Law, he went further in devising his own guidelines for reform. This constituted an argument that Greek ideas, and the wisdom of the ancient philosophers, are not only compatible with Islamic principles but also stand to offer much-needed guidance. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5770","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5770,"authors_free":[{"id":6683,"entry_id":5770,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ayesha Omar","free_first_name":"Ayesha ","free_last_name":"Omar","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s The Decisive Treatise: A Text for Political Reform","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s The Decisive Treatise: A Text for Political Reform"},"abstract":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s the Decisive Treatise (1126\u201398) is widely acknowledged as an important text for understanding his legal ideas, with some scholars describing this text as a legal opinion (fatwa) issued for the Malikite jurists of that period. Contrastingly, I argue that the Decisive Treatise forms part of Ibn Rushd\u2019s broader vision for political reform, and should thus be reconsidered as an important text for understanding his ideas on political authority. Whilst Ibn Rushd persisted in advancing the Almohad policy of reform, by calling on the religious scholars who occupied an important space in Almohad society to relinquish their narrow positions on how to understand and interpret Islamic Law, he went further in devising his own guidelines for reform. This constituted an argument that Greek ideas, and the wisdom of the ancient philosophers, are not only compatible with Islamic principles but also stand to offer much-needed guidance.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0971945818801398","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5770,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Medieval History Journal","volume":"22","issue":"1","pages":"131-155"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Averroismi al plurale, II. La ricezione del Commento grande al De anima di Ibn Rushd nelle Quaestiones in tertium de anima di Sigieri di Brabante |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Dianoia |
| Volume | 28 |
| Pages | 81–94 |
| Categories | Siger of Brabant, De anima |
| Author(s) | Federico Minzoni |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Siger of Brabant sketches in his Quaestiones in tertium de anima (ca. 1269) a noetic theory defending the unity of the intellect that is usually considered as a latin formulation of Ibn Rušd’s theory of the separateness of the material intellect as put forth in the Long Commentary on the De anima (ca. 1186). A closer look at key texts in both the Quaestiones and the Long Commentary will give us a quite different picture: while Siger works out his theory on the background of a dualistic anthropology that takes the union between the intellective soul (conceived as an hoc aliquid) and the human body to be only operational, Ibn Rušd (who develops his theory starting from strictly aristotelic epistemological premises) repeatedly stresses throughout the Long Commentary that, if man is an agent of thought, the union between the separate intellects and the thinking individual ought to be always hylomorphic. This paper aims at showing that, although Siger has often been identified as an averroist, his psychology is certainly not rushdian. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5014","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5014,"authors_free":[{"id":5750,"entry_id":5014,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Federico Minzoni","free_first_name":"Federico","free_last_name":"Minzoni","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Averroismi al plurale, II. La ricezione del Commento grande al De anima di Ibn Rushd nelle Quaestiones in tertium de anima di Sigieri di Brabante","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroismi al plurale, II. La ricezione del Commento grande al De anima di Ibn Rushd nelle Quaestiones in tertium de anima di Sigieri di Brabante"},"abstract":"Siger of Brabant sketches in his Quaestiones in tertium de anima (ca. 1269) a noetic theory defending the unity of the intellect that is usually considered as a latin formulation of Ibn Ru\u0161d\u2019s theory of the separateness of the material intellect as put forth in the Long Commentary on the De anima (ca. 1186). A closer look at key texts in both the Quaestiones and the Long Commentary will give us a quite different picture: while Siger works out his theory on the background of a dualistic anthropology that takes the union between the intellective soul (conceived as an hoc aliquid) and the human body to be only operational, Ibn Ru\u0161d (who develops his theory starting from strictly aristotelic epistemological premises) repeatedly stresses throughout the Long Commentary that, if man is an agent of thought, the union between the separate intellects and the thinking individual ought to be always hylomorphic. This paper aims at showing that, although Siger has often been identified as an averroist, his psychology is certainly not rushdian. ","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":57,"category_name":"Siger of Brabant","link":"bib?categories[]=Siger of Brabant"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5014,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Dianoia","volume":"28","issue":"","pages":"81\u201394"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Problemi della tradizione a stampa del De substantia orbis di Averroè |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia, V Serie |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 559–580 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Giovanni Licata |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5052","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5052,"authors_free":[{"id":5802,"entry_id":5052,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1599,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Giovanni Licata","free_first_name":"Giovanni ","free_last_name":"Licata","norm_person":{"id":1599,"first_name":"Giovanni","last_name":"Licata","full_name":"Giovanni Licata","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1128655918","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/306437659","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Giovanni Licata"}}],"entry_title":"Problemi della tradizione a stampa del De substantia orbis di Averro\u00e8","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Problemi della tradizione a stampa del De substantia orbis di Averro\u00e8"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1599,"full_name":"Giovanni Licata","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5052,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia, V Serie","volume":"11","issue":"2","pages":"559\u2013580"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | La doctrina general de los trascendentales en Dietrich von Freiberg, y su filiación aristotélico-averroísta |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 659–681 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Metaphysics, Avicenna, Tradition and Reception, Latin Averroism, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Fernanda Ocampo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The Aristotelian text Metaphysics IV, 2, and the interpretations carried out by the Muslim philosophers, i.e., Avicenna and Averroes, constitute the theoretical framework in which several Latin authors of the second half of the 13th century from the University of Paris, who have taken a stance around the question of the ‘real distinction’ between esse and essentia, elaborated their doctrines about transcendentals. According to this, our work seeks to trace the dependence of Dietrich’s general doctrine of the transcendentals, with respect to the theses established by Aristotle in the mentioned text, and in particular, with regard to the Averroist reading – critical of that of Avicenna’s –, which “has made school” in the Parisian environment, especially among the teachers and students of the Faculty of Arts, but also, first, in Thomas Aquinas. Thus, in light of this scenario of readings and interpretations, we will seek to delimit the central features of the Theodorian conception of the communia, pointing out the possible differences or coincidences with respect to the doctrines of these preceding authors. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5060","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5060,"authors_free":[{"id":5813,"entry_id":5060,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fernanda Ocampo","free_first_name":"Fernanda ","free_last_name":"Ocampo","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"La doctrina general de los trascendentales en Dietrich von Freiberg, y su filiaci\u00f3n aristot\u00e9lico-averro\u00edsta","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La doctrina general de los trascendentales en Dietrich von Freiberg, y su filiaci\u00f3n aristot\u00e9lico-averro\u00edsta"},"abstract":"The Aristotelian text Metaphysics IV, 2, and the interpretations carried out by the Muslim philosophers, i.e., Avicenna and Averroes, constitute the theoretical framework in which several Latin authors of the second half of the 13th century from the University of Paris, who have taken a stance around the question of the \u2018real distinction\u2019 between esse and essentia, elaborated their doctrines about transcendentals. According to this, our work seeks to trace the dependence of Dietrich\u2019s general doctrine of the transcendentals, with respect to the theses established by Aristotle in the mentioned text, and in particular, with regard to the Averroist reading \u2013 critical of that of Avicenna\u2019s \u2013, which \u201chas made school\u201d in the Parisian environment, especially among the teachers and students of the Faculty of Arts, but also, first, in Thomas Aquinas. Thus, in light of this scenario of readings and interpretations, we will seek to delimit the central features of the Theodorian conception of the communia, pointing out the possible differences or coincidences with respect to the doctrines of these preceding authors.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.5209\/ashf.63089","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5060,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosof\u00eda","volume":"36","issue":"3","pages":"659\u2013681"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Ibn Sînâ and Ibn Rushd on Essence and Existence: A Critical Analysis |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Ishraq |
| Volume | 9 |
| Pages | 13–22 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Metaphysics, Ontology |
| Author(s) | Ahmad Ahmadi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5064","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5064,"authors_free":[{"id":5820,"entry_id":5064,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ahmad Ahmadi","free_first_name":" Ahmad","free_last_name":"Ahmadi","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn S\u00een\u00e2 and Ibn Rushd on Essence and Existence: A Critical Analysis","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn S\u00een\u00e2 and Ibn Rushd on Essence and Existence: A Critical Analysis"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":65,"category_name":"Ontology","link":"bib?categories[]=Ontology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5064,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ishraq","volume":"9","issue":"","pages":"13\u201322"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd in the Hanbalî Tradition. Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya and the Continuity of Philosophy in Muslim Contexts |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | The Muslim World |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 561–581 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Influence |
| Author(s) | Fouad Ben Ahmed |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5069","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5069,"authors_free":[{"id":5829,"entry_id":5069,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1440,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","free_first_name":"Fouad ","free_last_name":"Ben Ahmed","norm_person":{"id":1440,"first_name":"Fouad","last_name":"Ben Ahmed","full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","short_ident":"FouBen","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fouad Ben Ahmed"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd in the Hanbal\u00ee Tradition. Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya and the Continuity of Philosophy in Muslim Contexts","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd in the Hanbal\u00ee Tradition. Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya and the Continuity of Philosophy in Muslim Contexts"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":" https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/muwo.12310","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"}],"authors":[{"id":1440,"full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5069,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Muslim World","volume":"109","issue":"4","pages":"561\u2013581"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd’s Solution to the Problem of the “Virtuous Society” |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 43–65 |
| Categories | Politics, Law, Commentary, Plato |
| Author(s) | Jaan S. Islam |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article is an analysis of the political thought of Ibn Rushd and its significance for the current conflict in Islamic political thought between liberal, secular and conservative Islamist thinkers over the meaning of the “virtuous society” and how it can be implemented. It is argued that the thought of Ibn Rushd offers a concept of the virtuous society that reconciles secular law and religious Sharī‘a law. The article analyzes Ibn Rushd’s Commentary on Plato’s Republic, and assesses it as potentially being able to reconcile the philosophical conflict between logically discerned law and revealed law. It is contended that the separation between “religious” and “political” (i.e., philosophical) domains often attributed to Ibn Rushd does not fully consider the entirety of Ibn Rushd’s writings and interprets his works without regard for their historical and religious contextual significance. |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/jims.4.1.02 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.2979/jims.4.1.02 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5078","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5078,"authors_free":[{"id":5839,"entry_id":5078,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jaan S. Islam","free_first_name":"Jaan S. ","free_last_name":"Islam","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd\u2019s Solution to the Problem of the \u201cVirtuous Society\u201d","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd\u2019s Solution to the Problem of the \u201cVirtuous Society\u201d"},"abstract":"This article is an analysis of the political thought of Ibn Rushd and its significance for the current conflict in Islamic political thought between liberal, secular and conservative Islamist thinkers over the meaning of the \u201cvirtuous society\u201d and how it can be implemented. It is argued that the thought of Ibn Rushd offers a concept of the virtuous society that reconciles secular law and religious Shar\u012b\u2018a law. The article analyzes Ibn Rushd\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic, and assesses it as potentially being able to reconcile the philosophical conflict between logically discerned law and revealed law. It is contended that the separation between \u201creligious\u201d and \u201cpolitical\u201d (i.e., philosophical) domains often attributed to Ibn Rushd does not fully consider the entirety of Ibn Rushd\u2019s writings and interprets his works without regard for their historical and religious contextual significance.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/10.2979\/jims.4.1.02","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2979\/jims.4.1.02 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5078,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies","volume":"4","issue":"1","pages":"43\u201365"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Averroès et la censure de l'histoire |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2016 |
| Journal | Doctor Virtualis |
| Volume | 13 (Filologia e filosofia) |
| Pages | 135–152 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Modern Readings, Modern Interpretations and Adaptations |
| Author(s) | Francesca Forte |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This paper aims to outline the historical debate about the Averroes’ heritage since its beginning, with the revival of Averroes by French Orientalism (Renan) coming up to contemporary Arab-Muslim intellectuals, who made this author an Enlightenment’s representative before its time. The aim of the contribution is therefore to recall briefly the history of this debate to highlight the political and ideological utilization of a medieval author and, ultimately, to emphasize that every history of philosophy implies a view oriented and never neutral on its tradition. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5241","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5241,"authors_free":[{"id":6050,"entry_id":5241,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Francesca Forte","free_first_name":"Francesca","free_last_name":"Forte","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8s et la censure de l'histoire","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8s et la censure de l'histoire"},"abstract":"This paper aims to outline the historical debate about the Averroes\u2019 heritage since its beginning, with the revival of Averroes by French Orientalism (Renan) coming up to contemporary Arab-Muslim intellectuals, who made this author an Enlightenment\u2019s representative before its time. The aim of the contribution is therefore to recall briefly the history of this debate to highlight the political and ideological utilization of a medieval author and, ultimately, to emphasize that every history of philosophy implies a view oriented and never neutral on its tradition.","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13130\/2035-7362\/6840 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":35,"category_name":"Modern Readings","link":"bib?categories[]=Modern Readings"},{"id":52,"category_name":"Modern Interpretations and Adaptations","link":"bib?categories[]=Modern Interpretations and Adaptations"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5241,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Doctor Virtualis","volume":"13 (Filologia e filosofia)","issue":"","pages":"135\u2013152"}},"sort":["Averro\u00e8s et la censure de l'histoire"]}
| Title | Averroès grammairien |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Histoire Épistémologie Langage |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | S. 127-142 |
| Categories | Linguistics, Logic |
| Author(s) | Jean-Patrick Guillaume |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The short treatise on Arabic grammar by Averroes (Ibn Rušd) entitled Al-Ḍarūrī fī ṣināˁat al-naḥw (“The Indispensable in the Art of Grammar”) is of considerable interest for the history of linguistic ideas. Although Averroes does not challenge the basic postulates and aims of traditional grammar, he adopts a more universalistic stance, and shows himself strongly critical of the grammarians, whom he reproaches with following an insufficiently rigorous method. This leads him, however, to raise a fundamental issue, already pointed out by Fārābī, the lack of a syntactic component in the traditional theory, and to put forth a quite original solution, reducing all possible constructions to two main types, predicative (tarkīb iḫbār) and determinative (tarkīb taqyīd). |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5599","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5599,"authors_free":[{"id":6500,"entry_id":5599,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1855,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Patrick Guillaume","free_first_name":"Jean-Patrick","free_last_name":"Guillaume","norm_person":{"id":1855,"first_name":"Jean-Patrick ","last_name":" Guillaume","full_name":"Jean-Patrick Guillaume","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1117499030","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Patrick Guillaume"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8s grammairien","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8s grammairien"},"abstract":"The short treatise on Arabic grammar by Averroes (Ibn Ru\u0161d) entitled Al-\u1e0car\u016br\u012b f\u012b \u1e63in\u0101\u02c1at al-na\u1e25w (\u201cThe Indispensable in the Art of Grammar\u201d) is of considerable interest for the history of linguistic ideas. Although Averroes does not challenge the basic postulates and aims of traditional grammar, he adopts a more universalistic stance, and shows himself strongly critical of the grammarians, whom he reproaches with following an insufficiently rigorous method. This leads him, however, to raise a fundamental issue, already pointed out by F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b, the lack of a syntactic component in the traditional theory, and to put forth a quite original solution, reducing all possible constructions to two main types, predicative (tark\u012bb i\u1e2bb\u0101r) and determinative (tark\u012bb taqy\u012bd).","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.4000\/hel.2737","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":78,"category_name":"Linguistics","link":"bib?categories[]=Linguistics"},{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":1855,"full_name":"Jean-Patrick Guillaume","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5599,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Histoire \u00c9pist\u00e9mologie Langage","volume":" 44","issue":"2","pages":" S. 127-142"}},"sort":["Averro\u00e8s grammairien"]}
| Title | Averroès le commentateur philosophe |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Arabic |
| Date | 2014 |
| Journal | al-Machriq |
| Volume | 88 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 253-263 |
| Categories | Averroism |
| Author(s) | Gérard Jéhamy |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2034","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2034,"authors_free":[{"id":2474,"entry_id":2034,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1394,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"G\u00e9rard J\u00e9hamy","free_first_name":"G\u00e9rard","free_last_name":"J\u00e9hamy","norm_person":{"id":1394,"first_name":"G\u00e9rard","last_name":"J\u00e9hamy","full_name":"G\u00e9rard J\u00e9hamy","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/108982419X","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/24779926","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=G\u00e9rard J\u00e9hamy"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8s le commentateur philosophe","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8s le commentateur philosophe"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2014","language":"Arabic","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"}],"authors":[{"id":1394,"full_name":"G\u00e9rard J\u00e9hamy","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2034,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"al-Machriq","volume":"88","issue":"1","pages":"253-263"}},"sort":["Averro\u00e8s le commentateur philosophe"]}
| Title | Averroès pour quoi faire? |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2016 |
| Journal | Qantara, Magazine des cultures arabe et méditerranéenne |
| Issue | 100 |
| Pages | 48–51 |
| Categories | no categories |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5173","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5173,"authors_free":[{"id":5957,"entry_id":5173,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8s pour quoi faire?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8s pour quoi faire?"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5173,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Qantara, Magazine des cultures arabe et m\u00e9diterran\u00e9enne","volume":"","issue":"100","pages":"48\u201351"}},"sort":["Averro\u00e8s pour quoi faire?"]}
| Title | Averroès à propos de la définition de l'acte légal: le miracle comme levier d'adhésion à la Loi |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | Mélanges de l'Université Saint-Joseph |
| Volume | 64 |
| Pages | 239-259 |
| Categories | Law |
| Author(s) | Ziad Bou Akl |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"2027","_score":null,"_source":{"id":2027,"authors_free":[{"id":2467,"entry_id":2027,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1608,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ziad Bou Akl","free_first_name":"Ziad","free_last_name":"Bou Akl","norm_person":{"id":1608,"first_name":"Ziad","last_name":"Bou Akl","full_name":"Ziad Bou Akl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1105658635","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/306483990","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ziad Bou Akl"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 propos de la d\u00e9finition de l'acte l\u00e9gal: le miracle comme levier d'adh\u00e9sion \u00e0 la Loi","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 propos de la d\u00e9finition de l'acte l\u00e9gal: le miracle comme levier d'adh\u00e9sion \u00e0 la Loi"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"}],"authors":[{"id":1608,"full_name":"Ziad Bou Akl","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":2027,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l'Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"64","issue":null,"pages":"239-259"}},"sort":["Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 propos de la d\u00e9finition de l'acte l\u00e9gal: le miracle comme levier d'adh\u00e9sion \u00e0 la Loi"]}
| Title | Averroès, définition et démonstration |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2003 |
| Journal | Philosophie |
| Volume | 77 |
| Pages | 12–22 |
| Categories | Logic |
| Author(s) | Ali Benmakhlouf |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1027","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1027,"authors_free":[{"id":1196,"entry_id":1027,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":774,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","free_first_name":"Ali","free_last_name":"Benmakhlouf","norm_person":{"id":774,"first_name":"Ali","last_name":"Benmakhlouf","full_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/120589850","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/24737587","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ali Benmakhlouf"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8s, d\u00e9finition et d\u00e9monstration","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8s, d\u00e9finition et d\u00e9monstration"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2003","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"}],"authors":[{"id":774,"full_name":"Ali Benmakhlouf","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1027,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Philosophie","volume":"77","issue":null,"pages":"12\u201322"}},"sort":["Averro\u00e8s, d\u00e9finition et d\u00e9monstration"]}
| Title | Averroès, un vieux nom d'Europe |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2001 |
| Journal | Esprit |
| Volume | 8–9 |
| Pages | 202–208 |
| Categories | Surveys |
| Author(s) | Jean-Loup Thébaud |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/24280101 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"995","_score":null,"_source":{"id":995,"authors_free":[{"id":1167,"entry_id":995,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1065,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Loup Th\u00e9baud","free_first_name":"Jean-Loup","free_last_name":"Th\u00e9baud","norm_person":{"id":1065,"first_name":"Jean-Loup","last_name":"Th\u00e9baud","full_name":"Jean-Loup Th\u00e9baud","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/137689462","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/34579354","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Loup Th\u00e9baud"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8s, un vieux nom d'Europe","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8s, un vieux nom d'Europe"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2001","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/24280101","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":18,"category_name":"Surveys","link":"bib?categories[]=Surveys"}],"authors":[{"id":1065,"full_name":"Jean-Loup Th\u00e9baud","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":995,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Esprit","volume":"8\u20139","issue":null,"pages":"202\u2013208"}},"sort":["Averro\u00e8s, un vieux nom d'Europe"]}
| Title | Averroës' Takfir of al-Ghazālī: Ta'wīl and Causal Kufr |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | American journal of Islam and society |
| Volume | 38 |
| Issue | 1/2 |
| Pages | 60-92 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Theology |
| Author(s) | Saja Parvizian |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Al-Ghazālı̄ famously claims in the Incoherence of the Philosophers that al-Fārābī and Avicenna are unbelievers because they hold philosophical positions that conflict with Islam. What is less well-known, however, is that Averroës claims in the Decisive Treatise that al-Fārābī and Avicenna are not unbelievers; rather, al-Ghazālı̄ is the true unbeliever for writing the Incoherence of the Philosophers. In this paper, my aim is to present a sustained reconstruction of Averroës’ legal and philosophical argument for why al-Ghazālı̄ is an unbeliever. The crux of Averroës’ argument is that al-Ghazālı̄ has expressed false allegorical interpretations of scripture to unqualified persons, which has caused them to fall into unbelief. By being causally responsible for other people’s unbelief, al-Ghazālı̄ is an unbeliever as well. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5566","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5566,"authors_free":[{"id":6460,"entry_id":5566,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Saja Parvizian","free_first_name":"Saja ","free_last_name":"Parvizian","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00ebs' Takfir of al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b: Ta'w\u012bl and Causal Kufr","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00ebs' Takfir of al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b: Ta'w\u012bl and Causal Kufr"},"abstract":"Al-Ghaza\u0304l\u0131\u0304 famously claims in the Incoherence of the Philosophers that al-Fa\u0304ra\u0304bi\u0304 and Avicenna are unbelievers because they hold philosophical positions that conflict with Islam. What is less well-known, however, is that Averroe\u0308s claims in the Decisive Treatise that al-Fa\u0304ra\u0304bi\u0304 and Avicenna are not unbelievers; rather, al-Ghaza\u0304l\u0131\u0304 is the true unbeliever for writing the Incoherence of the Philosophers. In this paper, my aim is to present a sustained reconstruction of Averroe\u0308s\u2019 legal and philosophical argument for why al-Ghaza\u0304l\u0131\u0304 is an unbeliever. The crux of Averroe\u0308s\u2019 argument is that al-Ghaza\u0304l\u0131\u0304 has expressed false allegorical interpretations of scripture to unqualified persons, which has caused them to fall into unbelief. By being causally responsible for other people\u2019s unbelief, al-Ghaza\u0304l\u0131\u0304 is an unbeliever as well.","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.35632\/ajis.v38i1-2.735","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5566,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"American journal of Islam and society","volume":"38","issue":"1\/2","pages":"60-92"}},"sort":["Averro\u00ebs' Takfir of al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b: Ta'w\u012bl and Causal Kufr"]}
| Title | Averroës's Search: The Aesthetics of Failure as a Starting Point for Writing |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2020 |
| Journal | Variaciones Borges |
| Volume | 49 |
| Pages | 257-282 |
| Categories | Borges, Poetics, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Hernán Martínez Millán |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/27034385 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5405","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5405,"authors_free":[{"id":6266,"entry_id":5405,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Hern\u00e1n Mart\u00ednez Mill\u00e1n ","free_first_name":"Hern\u00e1n","free_last_name":"Mart\u00ednez Mill\u00e1n ","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00ebs's Search: The Aesthetics of Failure as a Starting Point for Writing","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00ebs's Search: The Aesthetics of Failure as a Starting Point for Writing"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2020","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/27034385","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":34,"category_name":"Borges","link":"bib?categories[]=Borges"},{"id":44,"category_name":"Poetics","link":"bib?categories[]=Poetics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5405,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Variaciones Borges","volume":"49","issue":"","pages":"257-282"}},"sort":["Averro\u00ebs's Search: The Aesthetics of Failure as a Starting Point for Writing"]}
| Title | Averróis e a República de Platão |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Date | 2007 |
| Journal | VeritasA Filosofia árabe e judaica e o ocidente medieval |
| Volume | 52 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 104–116 |
| Categories | Plato, Politics |
| Author(s) | Rosalie Helena de Souza Pereira , Rosalie Helena de Souza Pereira |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1465","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1465,"authors_free":[{"id":1673,"entry_id":1465,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1347,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rosalie Helena de Souza Pereira","free_first_name":"Rosalie Helena","free_last_name":"de Souza Pereira","norm_person":{"id":1347,"first_name":"Rosalie Helena","last_name":"de Souza Pereira","full_name":"Rosalie Helena de Souza Pereira","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/121640755","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Rosalie Helena de Souza Pereira"}},{"id":1674,"entry_id":1465,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1347,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Rosalie Helena de Souza Pereira","free_first_name":"Rosalie Helena","free_last_name":"de Souza Pereira","norm_person":{"id":1347,"first_name":"Rosalie Helena","last_name":"de Souza Pereira","full_name":"Rosalie Helena de Souza Pereira","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/121640755","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Rosalie Helena de Souza Pereira"}}],"entry_title":"Averr\u00f3is e a Rep\u00fablica de Plat\u00e3o","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averr\u00f3is e a Rep\u00fablica de Plat\u00e3o"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2007","language":"Portuguese","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"}],"authors":[{"id":1347,"full_name":"Rosalie Helena de Souza Pereira","role":1},{"id":1347,"full_name":"Rosalie Helena de Souza Pereira","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1465,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"VeritasA Filosofia \u00e1rabe e judaica e o ocidente medieval","volume":"52","issue":"3","pages":"104\u2013116"}},"sort":["Averr\u00f3is e a Rep\u00fablica de Plat\u00e3o"]}