{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5156","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5156,"authors_free":[{"id":5937,"entry_id":5156,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Malik Mufti","free_first_name":"Malik","free_last_name":"Mufti","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s Political Philosophy in Contemporary Arab Scholarship: A Transient Revival","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s Political Philosophy in Contemporary Arab Scholarship: A Transient Revival"},"abstract":"What is it about Ibn Rushd that has made him such a lodestar for two different generations of Arab intellectuals\u2013one which emerged in the early 1900s, the other in the late 1970s? Focusing on the second group, which arose in the milieu of young intellectuals who had been shaped by the secular pan-Arab nationalist and socialist ideologies of the 1950s and 1960s, but who now confronted the bankruptcy of those ideologies in the face of an insurgent populist Islamism, the following review identifies two currents in contemporary Arabic Rushdian scholarship: cultural nationalism and modernizing universalism. After analyzing how each sought inspiration in Ibn Rushd for its vision of Arab renewal, and then showing how deepening exposure to Ibn Rushd's texts revealed the incommensurability of his political philosophy with their nationalist, secularist or egalitarian agendas, I suggest that this \"Second Wave\" of Rushdian enthusiasm is already beginning to ebb. As pressure for democratization intensifies, the consolidation of democratic norms is narrowing the options for Arab intellectuals to a choice between a comprehensive liberalism and a religious populism neither of which seems to have any use for Ibn Rushd's political philosophy. While some individuals are opting for the latter choice, it appears that the majority of both currents are converging around a comprehensively liberal consensus. In such a context, can Ibn Rushd with his insistence on differentiating between high and low still provide, if not an alternative, at least a corrective to the prevailing spirit of the age?","btype":3,"date":"","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/10.2979\/jims.2.1.02","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2979\/jims.2.1.02 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"},{"id":35,"category_name":"Modern Readings","link":"bib?categories[]=Modern Readings"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5156,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies","volume":"2","issue":"1","pages":"17\u201335"}},"sort":["Ibn Rushd\u2019s Political Philosophy in Contemporary Arab Scholarship: A Transient Revival"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"667","_score":null,"_source":{"id":667,"authors_free":[{"id":820,"entry_id":667,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":756,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","free_first_name":"Andr\u00e9s","free_last_name":"Mart\u00ednez Lorca","norm_person":{"id":756,"first_name":"Andr\u00e9s","last_name":"Mart\u00ednez Lorca","full_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1047955687","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51730671","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d como historiador de la filosof\u00eda","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d como historiador de la filosof\u00eda"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1992","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":36,"category_name":"Particular Aspects throughout the Oeuvre","link":"bib?categories[]=Particular Aspects throughout the Oeuvre"}],"authors":[{"id":756,"full_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":667,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Bulletin of the Faculty of Arts (Cairo University)","volume":"[52] 54","issue":null,"pages":"101\u2013120"}},"sort":["Ibn Ru\u0161d como historiador de la filosof\u00eda"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"479","_score":null,"_source":{"id":479,"authors_free":[{"id":623,"entry_id":479,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":779,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","free_first_name":"Abdelali","free_last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","norm_person":{"id":779,"first_name":"Abdelali","last_name":"Elamrani-Jamal","full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/154697621","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/7526121","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale"},"abstract":"Ibn Ru\u0161d devoted a certain number of works to Aristotle's Prior Analytics. In a series of opuscules written over a period of twenty years and following upon his Middle Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, he faced a problem particular to the modal syllogism - that of the mood of the conclusion in mixed syllogisms. The problem can be stated as follows: At the beginning of the Prior Analytics, Aristotle established a formal deductive principle - that of universal attribution (Pr. An. I.1.24b26\u201330). Applied to the modal syllogism, this principle is inadequate as stated. It is too general to be applied in a univocal manner in all modal syllogisms. To preserve a sense of coherence in Aristotle's declarations, the commentators had to interpret it. Presenting the interpretations of the commentators, primarily al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b and Alexander, on the basis of al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b's Large Commentary on Aristotle's Prior Analytics, Averroes criticizes them. Applied according to Alexander's interpretation, the principle of universal attribution is valid only for modal syllogisms one of whose premises is necessary and the other assertoric; according to al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b's interpretation, it is verified only when the minor premise is possible. Averroes proposes two preliminary solutions. Either this formal deductive principle must be applied differently according to the modal differences of the minor premises in mixed syllogisms (first solution) or would be used in two ways, generally or in keeping with each mood (second solution). These solutions are not satisfactory, for they call into question the unity and universality of the principle of universal attribution as established by Aristotle. What is the utility, Averroes asks, of a principle which does not hold for all modalities or does not apply to all the premises when the Prior Analytics ought to furnish formal and universal principles of deduction? And why did Aristotle define the principle of universal attribution without distinguishing its application according to each of the three modal premises? Returning at the end of his career to a literal exegesis of Aristotle's propositions and without harkening back to the earlier solutions, he proposes a theory of making the terms modal (fourth solution) in order to save Aristotle's declarations with respect to the principle of universal attribution and the mood of the conclusion of mixed syllogisms (Prior Analytics I. 9.30al5\u201320). Though formally inadequate, this solution, which had a continued history, proposes a new way of looking at the classification of modal propositions.","btype":3,"date":"1995","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":15,"category_name":"Alexander of Aphrodisias","link":"bib?categories[]=Alexander of Aphrodisias"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[{"id":779,"full_name":"Abdelali Elamrani-Jamal","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":479,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"5","issue":null,"pages":"51\u201374"}},"sort":["Ibn Ru\u0161d et les Premiers Analytiques d'Aristote. Aper\u00e7u sur un probl\u00e8me de syllogistique modale"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"659","_score":null,"_source":{"id":659,"authors_free":[{"id":812,"entry_id":659,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":886,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Zev Harvey","free_first_name":"Zev","free_last_name":"Harvey","norm_person":{"id":886,"first_name":"Zev","last_name":"Harvey","full_name":"Zev Harvey","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142942847","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/115907841","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd142942847.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Zev Harvey"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d ve-ha-RaMBaM \u02bfal \u1e25obat ha-hitbonenut ha-pilo\u1e63ofit (i\u02bftib\u0101r)","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":"Averroes and Maimonides on the obligation of philosophical contemplation (i\u02bftib\u0101r)","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Ru\u0161d ve-ha-RaMBaM \u02bfal \u1e25obat ha-hitbonenut ha-pilo\u1e63ofit (i\u02bftib\u0101r)"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1989","language":"Hebrew","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":36,"category_name":"Particular Aspects throughout the Oeuvre","link":"bib?categories[]=Particular Aspects throughout the Oeuvre"}],"authors":[{"id":886,"full_name":"Zev Harvey","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":659,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Tarbiz","volume":"58","issue":null,"pages":"75\u201383"}},"sort":["Ibn Ru\u0161d ve-ha-RaMBaM \u02bfal \u1e25obat ha-hitbonenut ha-pilo\u1e63ofit (i\u02bftib\u0101r)"]}

{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5064","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5064,"authors_free":[{"id":5820,"entry_id":5064,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ahmad Ahmadi","free_first_name":" Ahmad","free_last_name":"Ahmadi","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn S\u00een\u00e2 and Ibn Rushd on Essence and Existence: A Critical Analysis","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn S\u00een\u00e2 and Ibn Rushd on Essence and Existence: A Critical Analysis"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":65,"category_name":"Ontology","link":"bib?categories[]=Ontology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5064,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ishraq","volume":"9","issue":"","pages":"13\u201322"}},"sort":["Ibn S\u00een\u00e2 and Ibn Rushd on Essence and Existence: A Critical Analysis"]}