| This article is intended to illustrate that the hermeneutics of al-Ghazzali influenced Ibn Rushd in a certain degree. One can come across a number of contexts in the works of Ibn Rushd such as Tahafut al-tahafut, Fasl al-maqal and al-Kashf,in which he criticizes al-Ghazzali in relation to the interpretation of religious texts. However, one can notice that Ibn Rushd is deeply influenced by the views of al-Ghazzali on the matter of hermeneutics, especially concerning the definition of interpretation, the categorization of the ambiguous wordings in the religious texts as well as the classification of the groups of people authorized to fulfill the task of interpretation. In fact, Ibn Rushd’s threefold graduation of people as the masses, thetheologians, and the demonstrative people was masterminded and introduced by al-Ghazzali. In addition, it is from al-Ghazzali and from his interpretation of the125th verse of Surat al-Nahl that Ibn Rushd borrowed the suggestion that as regards the interpretation of religious texts, each of these three groups should adopt one of the three methods described as rhetorical, dialectical, and demonstrative. Another important context where Ibn Rushd is clearly under the influence of al-Ghazzali is the issue how the lawful method of interpretation is to be applied to the religious texts. Regarding this issue, he took up al-Ghazzali’s fivefold categorization of“being” as essential existence, sensual existence, imaginative existence, mental existence and analogical existence, suggesting to interpret the religious texts on the basis of this categorization. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5372","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5372,"authors_free":[{"id":6224,"entry_id":5372,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mesut Okumus","free_first_name":"Mesut","free_last_name":"Okumus","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"The Influence of al-Ghazzali on the Hermeneutics of Ibn Rushd","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Influence of al-Ghazzali on the Hermeneutics of Ibn Rushd"},"abstract":"This article is intended to illustrate that the hermeneutics of al-Ghazzali influenced Ibn Rushd in a certain degree. One can come across a number of contexts in the works of Ibn Rushd such as Tahafut al-tahafut, Fasl al-maqal and al-Kashf,in which he criticizes al-Ghazzali in relation to the interpretation of religious texts. However, one can notice that Ibn Rushd is deeply influenced by the views of al-Ghazzali on the matter of hermeneutics, especially concerning the definition of interpretation, the categorization of the ambiguous wordings in the religious texts as well as the classification of the groups of people authorized to fulfill the task of interpretation. In fact, Ibn Rushd\u2019s threefold graduation of people as the masses, thetheologians, and the demonstrative people was masterminded and introduced by al-Ghazzali. In addition, it is from al-Ghazzali and from his interpretation of the125th verse of Surat al-Nahl that Ibn Rushd borrowed the suggestion that as regards the interpretation of religious texts, each of these three groups should adopt one of the three methods described as rhetorical, dialectical, and demonstrative. Another important context where Ibn Rushd is clearly under the influence of al-Ghazzali is the issue how the lawful method of interpretation is to be applied to the religious texts. Regarding this issue, he took up al-Ghazzali\u2019s fivefold categorization of\u201cbeing\u201d as essential existence, sensual existence, imaginative existence, mental existence and analogical existence, suggesting to interpret the religious texts on the basis of this categorization.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1515\/ISLAM.2011.023","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5372,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Der Islam","volume":"86","issue":"2","pages":"286\u2013311"}},"sort":[2011]}
| Title | Redefining the Miraculous: al-Ghazâlî, Ibn Rushd and Said Nursi on Qur’anic Miracle Stories |
| Translation | إعادة تحديد اﻷمر المعجز: آراء الغزالي وابن رشد وسعيد النورسي في قصص المعجزات |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | Journal of Qur’anic Studies |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 86–108 |
| Categories | Natural Philosophy, Theology, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | Isra Yazicioglu |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Miracle stories in sacred texts have been a source of both fascination and heated debate across religious traditions. Qur'anic miracle stories are especially interesting because they are part of a discourse that also de-emphasises the miraculous. By looking at how three scholars have engaged with Qur'anic miracle stories, I here investigate how these narratives have been interpreted in diverse and fruitful ways. The first part of the article analyses how two medieval scholars, al-Ghazālī (d. 505/1 111) and Ibn Rushd (d. 595/1198), engaged with the implications of miracle stories. Taking his cue from miracle stories, al-Ghazālī offered a sophisticated critique of natural determinism and suggested that the natural order should be perceived as a constantly renewed divine gift. In contrast, Ibn Rushd dismissed al-Ghazālī's critique as sophistry and maintained that accepting the possibility that the natural order might be suspended was an affront to human knowledge and science. In the second part, I turn to Bediuzzaman Said Nursi (1870-1960), whose interpretation offers a crystallisation of al-Ghazālī's insights as well as, surprisingly, an indirect confirmation of Ibn Rushd's concerns about human knowledge and science. Nursi redefines the miraculous in light of miracle stories, and interprets them as reminders of 'everyday miracles' and as encouragements to improve science and technology in God's name. ظلت قصص المعجزات في الكتب الديننة أمراﹰ شائقاﹰ ومدار جدل ساخن في تعاليم اﻷديان المختلفة. وقصص المعجزات في القرآن ذات أهمية ﺧﺎﺻﺔ فهي جزء من خطاب يزيل ـ أيضاﹰ ـ التركيز على المعجز. وبالنظر في كيفية تعامل ﺛﻼﺛﺔ من العلماء مع قصص المعجزات أحاول في هذا المقال أن أتبين كيف تم تفسير هذه القصص بطرق مختلفة ومثمرة معاﹰ. وفي الجزء اﻷول من المقال نحلل كيف تعامل مفكران من الماضي هما الغزالي (ت 1111/505 ﻫ) وابن رشد (ت 1198/59 ﻫ) مع مضامين قصص المعجزات. فبناء على قصص المعجزات عرض الغزالي نقداﹰ حصيفاﹰ للحتمية الطبيعية واقترح أن تنظر ﺇلى الوضع الطبيعي على أنه منحة إلهية تتجدد باستمرار. وفي المقابل رفض ابن رشد نقد الغزالي واعتبره سفسطة وقال أن قبول احتمال تعطيل الوضع الطبيعي يجابه المعرفة اﻹنسانية والعلم. وفي الحزء الثاني من المقال تتناول بديع الزمان سعيد النورسي (1870 - 1960) الذي يمزج في تفسيره بين فراسة العزالي واهتمام ابن رشد بالمعرفة اﻹنسانية والعلم. ويعيد النورسي تحديد المعجز في ضوء قصص المعجزات ويقول إنها تذكرنا " بالمعجزات اليومية " وتشجعنا على التقدم في العلم والتكنولوجيا باسم اللّه . |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5381","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5381,"authors_free":[{"id":6233,"entry_id":5381,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1754,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Isra Yazicioglu","free_first_name":"Isra","free_last_name":"Yazicioglu","norm_person":{"id":1754,"first_name":"Isra","last_name":"Yazicioglu","full_name":"Isra Yazicioglu","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1050937392","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Isra Yazicioglu"}}],"entry_title":"Redefining the Miraculous: al-Ghaz\u00e2l\u00ee, Ibn Rushd and Said Nursi on Qur\u2019anic Miracle Stories","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"\u0625\u0639\u0627\u062f\u0629 \u062a\u062d\u062f\u064a\u062f \u0627\ufef7\u0645\u0631 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u062c\u0632: \u0622\u0631\u0627\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u063a\u0632\u0627\u0644\u064a \u0648\u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0648\u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631\u0633\u064a \u0641\u064a \u0642\u0635\u0635 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u062c\u0632\u0627\u062a","main_title":{"title":"Redefining the Miraculous: al-Ghaz\u00e2l\u00ee, Ibn Rushd and Said Nursi on Qur\u2019anic Miracle Stories"},"abstract":"Miracle stories in sacred texts have been a source of both fascination and heated debate across religious traditions. Qur'anic miracle stories are especially interesting because they are part of a discourse that also de-emphasises the miraculous. By looking at how three scholars have engaged with Qur'anic miracle stories, I here investigate how these narratives have been interpreted in diverse and fruitful ways. The first part of the article analyses how two medieval scholars, al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b (d. 505\/1 111) and Ibn Rushd (d. 595\/1198), engaged with the implications of miracle stories. Taking his cue from miracle stories, al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b offered a sophisticated critique of natural determinism and suggested that the natural order should be perceived as a constantly renewed divine gift. In contrast, Ibn Rushd dismissed al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b's critique as sophistry and maintained that accepting the possibility that the natural order might be suspended was an affront to human knowledge and science. In the second part, I turn to Bediuzzaman Said Nursi (1870-1960), whose interpretation offers a crystallisation of al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b's insights as well as, surprisingly, an indirect confirmation of Ibn Rushd's concerns about human knowledge and science. Nursi redefines the miraculous in light of miracle stories, and interprets them as reminders of 'everyday miracles' and as encouragements to improve science and technology in God's name.\r\n\r\n\u0638\u0644\u062a \u0642\u0635\u0635 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u062c\u0632\u0627\u062a \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0643\u062a\u0628 \u0627\u0644\u062f\u064a\u0646\u0646\u0629 \u0623\u0645\u0631\u0627\ufe70 \u0634\u0627\u0626\u0642\u0627\ufe70 \u0648\u0645\u062f\u0627\u0631 \u062c\u062f\u0644 \u0633\u0627\u062e\u0646 \u0641\u064a \u062a\u0639\u0627\u0644\u064a\u0645 \u0627\ufef7\u062f\u064a\u0627\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u062e\u062a\u0644\u0641\u0629. \u0648\u0642\u0635\u0635 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u062c\u0632\u0627\u062a \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0631\u0622\u0646 \u0630\u0627\u062a \u0623\u0647\u0645\u064a\u0629 \ufea7\ufe8e\ufebb\ufe94 \u0641\u0647\u064a \u062c\u0632\u0621 \u0645\u0646 \u062e\u0637\u0627\u0628 \u064a\u0632\u064a\u0644 \u0640 \u0623\u064a\u0636\u0627\ufe70 \u0640 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0631\u0643\u064a\u0632 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u062c\u0632. \u0648\u0628\u0627\u0644\u0646\u0638\u0631 \u0641\u064a \u0643\u064a\u0641\u064a\u0629 \u062a\u0639\u0627\u0645\u0644 \ufe9b\ufefc\ufe9b\ufe94 \u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0621 \u0645\u0639 \u0642\u0635\u0635 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u062c\u0632\u0627\u062a \u0623\u062d\u0627\u0648\u0644 \u0641\u064a \u0647\u0630\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0642\u0627\u0644 \u0623\u0646 \u0623\u062a\u0628\u064a\u0646 \u0643\u064a\u0641 \u062a\u0645 \u062a\u0641\u0633\u064a\u0631 \u0647\u0630\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0642\u0635\u0635 \u0628\u0637\u0631\u0642 \u0645\u062e\u062a\u0644\u0641\u0629 \u0648\u0645\u062b\u0645\u0631\u0629 \u0645\u0639\u0627\ufe70. \u0648\u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062c\u0632\u0621 \u0627\ufef7\u0648\u0644 \u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0642\u0627\u0644 \u0646\u062d\u0644\u0644 \u0643\u064a\u0641 \u062a\u0639\u0627\u0645\u0644 \u0645\u0641\u0643\u0631\u0627\u0646 \u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0627\u0636\u064a \u0647\u0645\u0627 \u0627\u0644\u063a\u0632\u0627\u0644\u064a (\u062a 1111\/505 \ufeeb) \u0648\u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f (\u062a 1198\/59 \ufeeb) \u0645\u0639 \u0645\u0636\u0627\u0645\u064a\u0646 \u0642\u0635\u0635 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u062c\u0632\u0627\u062a. \u0641\u0628\u0646\u0627\u0621 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0642\u0635\u0635 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u062c\u0632\u0627\u062a \u0639\u0631\u0636 \u0627\u0644\u063a\u0632\u0627\u0644\u064a \u0646\u0642\u062f\u0627\ufe70 \u062d\u0635\u064a\u0641\u0627\ufe70 \u0644\u0644\u062d\u062a\u0645\u064a\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0628\u064a\u0639\u064a\u0629 \u0648\u0627\u0642\u062a\u0631\u062d \u0623\u0646 \u062a\u0646\u0638\u0631 \ufe87\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0636\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0628\u064a\u0639\u064a \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0623\u0646\u0647 \u0645\u0646\u062d\u0629 \u0625\u0644\u0647\u064a\u0629 \u062a\u062a\u062c\u062f\u062f \u0628\u0627\u0633\u062a\u0645\u0631\u0627\u0631. \u0648\u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0642\u0627\u0628\u0644 \u0631\u0641\u0636 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0646\u0642\u062f \u0627\u0644\u063a\u0632\u0627\u0644\u064a \u0648\u0627\u0639\u062a\u0628\u0631\u0647 \u0633\u0641\u0633\u0637\u0629 \u0648\u0642\u0627\u0644 \u0623\u0646 \u0642\u0628\u0648\u0644 \u0627\u062d\u062a\u0645\u0627\u0644 \u062a\u0639\u0637\u064a\u0644 \u0627\u0644\u0648\u0636\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0637\u0628\u064a\u0639\u064a \u064a\u062c\u0627\u0628\u0647 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u0631\u0641\u0629 \u0627\ufef9\u0646\u0633\u0627\u0646\u064a\u0629 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0645. \u0648\u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u062d\u0632\u0621 \u0627\u0644\u062b\u0627\u0646\u064a \u0645\u0646 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0642\u0627\u0644 \u062a\u062a\u0646\u0627\u0648\u0644 \u0628\u062f\u064a\u0639 \u0627\u0644\u0632\u0645\u0627\u0646 \u0633\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631\u0633\u064a (1870 - 1960) \u0627\u0644\u0630\u064a \u064a\u0645\u0632\u062c \u0641\u064a \u062a\u0641\u0633\u064a\u0631\u0647 \u0628\u064a\u0646 \u0641\u0631\u0627\u0633\u0629 \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0632\u0627\u0644\u064a \u0648\u0627\u0647\u062a\u0645\u0627\u0645 \u0627\u0628\u0646 \u0631\u0634\u062f \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u0631\u0641\u0629 \u0627\ufef9\u0646\u0633\u0627\u0646\u064a\u0629 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0645. \u0648\u064a\u0639\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0646\u0648\u0631\u0633\u064a \u062a\u062d\u062f\u064a\u062f \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u062c\u0632 \u0641\u064a \u0636\u0648\u0621 \u0642\u0635\u0635 \u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u062c\u0632\u0627\u062a \u0648\u064a\u0642\u0648\u0644 \u0625\u0646\u0647\u0627 \u062a\u0630\u0643\u0631\u0646\u0627 \" \u0628\u0627\u0644\u0645\u0639\u062c\u0632\u0627\u062a \u0627\u0644\u064a\u0648\u0645\u064a\u0629 \" \u0648\u062a\u0634\u062c\u0639\u0646\u0627 \u0639\u0644\u0649 \u0627\u0644\u062a\u0642\u062f\u0645 \u0641\u064a \u0627\u0644\u0639\u0644\u0645 \u0648\u0627\u0644\u062a\u0643\u0646\u0648\u0644\u0648\u062c\u064a\u0627 \u0628\u0627\u0633\u0645 \u0627\u0644\u0644\u0651\u0647 .","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":1754,"full_name":"Isra Yazicioglu","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5381,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Qur\u2019anic Studies","volume":"13","issue":"2","pages":"86\u2013108"}},"sort":[2011]}
| Title | Greek essence and Islamic Tolerance : Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rush’d |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | The Review of Metaphysics |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 41–61 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, al-Ġazālī, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Michael Sweeney |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The philosophical affirmation of essence by Al-Farabi (his preferred position) and Ibn Rush'd allows for toleration of rehgion as an inferior but necessary way of life for most human beings. Since both AlFarabi's democracy and his political regime based on essence achieve varying degrees of tolerance by subordinating rehgion, the choice is between tolerance and the superiority of rehgion; that is, all agree that it is not possible to reconcile the supremacy of religion with a broad political tolerance. According to Al-Farabi, the question of tolerance, like the questions of politics in general, centers on the natural differences among human beings in their ability to grasp essence. |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/23055682 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5377","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5377,"authors_free":[{"id":6229,"entry_id":5377,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Michael Sweeney","free_first_name":"Michael","free_last_name":"Sweeney","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Greek essence and Islamic Tolerance : Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rush\u2019d","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Greek essence and Islamic Tolerance : Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rush\u2019d"},"abstract":"The philosophical affirmation of essence by Al-Farabi (his preferred position) and Ibn Rush'd allows for toleration of rehgion as an inferior but necessary way of life for most human beings. Since both AlFarabi's democracy and his political regime based on essence achieve varying degrees of tolerance by subordinating rehgion, the choice is between tolerance and the superiority of rehgion; that is, all agree that it is not possible to reconcile the supremacy of religion with a broad political tolerance. According to Al-Farabi, the question of tolerance, like the questions of politics in general, centers on the natural differences among human beings in their ability to grasp essence.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/23055682","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5377,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Review of Metaphysics","volume":"65","issue":"1","pages":"41\u201361"}},"sort":[2011]}
| Title | Discussion of Causality Based on the Conceptions of Nature of Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazalī |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2010 |
| Journal | Ilahiyat Studies. A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 241–258 |
| Categories | Natural Philosophy, al-Ġazālī, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Mehmet Fatih Birgül |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| In this short analysis, we will compare Ibn Rushd's justification of the causality principle to the suspicions and objections of al-Ghazālī. Nevertheless, our analysis of the issue will center on al-Ghazālī's and Ibn Rushd's conceptions of nature. Therefore, our article aims at illuminating two points: first, there is a fundamental difference between the conceptions of nature and generation of the two philosophers; second, this structural difference constitutes the real cause of disagreement over the causality principle. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1636","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1636,"authors_free":[{"id":1892,"entry_id":1636,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1425,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl","free_first_name":"Mehmet","free_last_name":"Fatih Birg\u00fcl","norm_person":{"id":1425,"first_name":"Mehmet","last_name":"Fatih Birg\u00fcl","full_name":"Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/101480661","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl"}}],"entry_title":"Discussion of Causality Based on the Conceptions of Nature of Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazal\u012b","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Discussion of Causality Based on the Conceptions of Nature of Ibn Rushd and al-Ghazal\u012b"},"abstract":"In this short analysis, we will compare Ibn Rushd's justification of the causality principle to the suspicions and objections of al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b. Nevertheless, our analysis of the issue will center on al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b's and Ibn Rushd's conceptions of nature. Therefore, our article aims at illuminating two points: first, there is a fundamental difference between the conceptions of nature and generation of the two philosophers; second, this structural difference constitutes the real cause of disagreement over the causality principle.","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.12730\/13091719.2010.12 (refers to the whole issue of the magazine)","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1425,"full_name":"Mehmet Fatih Birg\u00fcl","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1636,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ilahiyat Studies. A Journal on Islamic and Religious Studies","volume":"1","issue":"2","pages":"241\u2013258"}},"sort":[2010]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd and his Criticism for Esh’arism |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2010 |
| Journal | Journal of Islamic Research |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 82-97 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Theology, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Orhan Atalay |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5335","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5335,"authors_free":[{"id":6181,"entry_id":5335,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Orhan Atalay","free_first_name":"Orhan ","free_last_name":"Atalay","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd and his Criticism for Esh\u2019arism","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd and his Criticism for Esh\u2019arism"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5335,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic Research","volume":"3","issue":"2 ","pages":" 82-97"}},"sort":[2010]}
| Title | Aquinas, Ghazali, and Averroes on the Age of the Universe. Response to Massey |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2008 |
| Journal | Divinatio |
| Volume | 28 |
| Pages | 171–194 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Thomas, Theology, Cosmology |
| Author(s) | Chryssi Sidiropoulou |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5376","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5376,"authors_free":[{"id":6228,"entry_id":5376,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1323,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Chryssi Sidiropoulou","free_first_name":"Chryssi","free_last_name":"Sidiropoulou","norm_person":{"id":1323,"first_name":"Chryssi","last_name":"Sidiropoulou","full_name":"Chryssi Sidiropoulou","short_ident":"ChrSid","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Chryssi Sidiropoulou"}}],"entry_title":"Aquinas, Ghazali, and Averroes on the Age of the Universe. Response to Massey","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Aquinas, Ghazali, and Averroes on the Age of the Universe. Response to Massey"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2008","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"}],"authors":[{"id":1323,"full_name":"Chryssi Sidiropoulou","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5376,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Divinatio","volume":"28 ","issue":"","pages":"171\u2013194"}},"sort":[2008]}
| Title | Revisiting the Conflict between Religion and Philosophy in Islam: al- Ghazâlî’s Diagnosis of Onto-Theology |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2008 |
| Journal | Journal of Islamic Research |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 5–22 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Ontology, Theology, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | Fehrullah Terkan |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5378","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5378,"authors_free":[{"id":6230,"entry_id":5378,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fehrullah Terkan","free_first_name":"Fehrullah","free_last_name":"Terkan","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Revisiting the Conflict between Religion and Philosophy in Islam: al- Ghaz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019s Diagnosis of Onto-Theology","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Revisiting the Conflict between Religion and Philosophy in Islam: al- Ghaz\u00e2l\u00ee\u2019s Diagnosis of Onto-Theology"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2008","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":65,"category_name":"Ontology","link":"bib?categories[]=Ontology"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5378,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic Research","volume":"1","issue":"2","pages":"5\u201322"}},"sort":[2008]}
| Title | Why Did Fourteenth-Century Jews Turn to Alghazali's Account of Natural Science? |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2001 |
| Journal | The Jewish Quarterly Review |
| Volume | 91 |
| Issue | No. 3/4 |
| Pages | 359-376 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Natural Philosophy, Science |
| Author(s) | Steven Harvey |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/1455551 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.2307/1455551 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5745","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5745,"authors_free":[{"id":6653,"entry_id":5745,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":642,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Steven Harvey","free_first_name":"Steven ","free_last_name":"Harvey","norm_person":{"id":642,"first_name":"Steven","last_name":"Harvey","full_name":"Steven Harvey","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051482674","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/97890242","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Steven Harvey"}}],"entry_title":"Why Did Fourteenth-Century Jews Turn to Alghazali's Account of Natural Science?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Why Did Fourteenth-Century Jews Turn to Alghazali's Account of Natural Science?"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2001","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/1455551","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2307\/1455551","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"},{"id":56,"category_name":"Science","link":"bib?categories[]=Science"}],"authors":[{"id":642,"full_name":"Steven Harvey","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5745,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Jewish Quarterly Review","volume":"91","issue":"No. 3\/4","pages":"359-376"}},"sort":[2001]}
| Title | Causality and Occasionalism. A Study of the Theories of the Philosophers, Al-Ghazālī and Ibn Rushd |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1998 |
| Journal | Hamdard islamicus |
| Volume | 21 |
| Pages | 23–31 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | Yusuf Rahman |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"590","_score":null,"_source":{"id":590,"authors_free":[{"id":741,"entry_id":590,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":843,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Yusuf Rahman","free_first_name":"Yusuf","free_last_name":"Rahman","norm_person":{"id":843,"first_name":"Yusuf","last_name":"Rahman","full_name":"Yusuf Rahman","short_ident":"YusRah","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Yusuf Rahman"}}],"entry_title":"Causality and Occasionalism. A Study of the Theories of the Philosophers, Al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Ibn Rushd","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Causality and Occasionalism. A Study of the Theories of the Philosophers, Al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Ibn Rushd"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1998","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":843,"full_name":"Yusuf Rahman","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":590,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hamdard islamicus","volume":"21","issue":null,"pages":"23\u201331"}},"sort":[1998]}
| Title | Ghazālī and Averroes on Meaning |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1996 |
| Journal | Al-Masāq. Islam and the Medieval Mediterranean |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 179–189 |
| Categories | Logic, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | Oliver Leaman |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"515","_score":null,"_source":{"id":515,"authors_free":[{"id":660,"entry_id":515,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":672,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Oliver Leaman","free_first_name":"Oliver","free_last_name":"Leaman","norm_person":{"id":672,"first_name":"Oliver","last_name":"Leaman","full_name":"Oliver Leaman","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/129119792","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/54188412","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Oliver Leaman"}}],"entry_title":"Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Averroes on Meaning","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Averroes on Meaning"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1996","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":672,"full_name":"Oliver Leaman","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":515,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Mas\u0101q. Islam and the Medieval Mediterranean","volume":"9","issue":"1","pages":"179\u2013189"}},"sort":[1996]}
| Title | Ghazālī and Averroes on Meaning |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1996 |
| Journal | Al-Masāq. Islam and the Medieval Mediterranean |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 179–189 |
| Categories | Logic, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | Oliver Leaman |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"515","_score":null,"_source":{"id":515,"authors_free":[{"id":660,"entry_id":515,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":672,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Oliver Leaman","free_first_name":"Oliver","free_last_name":"Leaman","norm_person":{"id":672,"first_name":"Oliver","last_name":"Leaman","full_name":"Oliver Leaman","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/129119792","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/54188412","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Oliver Leaman"}}],"entry_title":"Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Averroes on Meaning","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Averroes on Meaning"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1996","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":27,"category_name":"Logic","link":"bib?categories[]=Logic"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":672,"full_name":"Oliver Leaman","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":515,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Al-Mas\u0101q. Islam and the Medieval Mediterranean","volume":"9","issue":"1","pages":"179\u2013189"}},"sort":["Ghaz\u0101l\u012b and Averroes on Meaning"]}
| Title | Greek essence and Islamic Tolerance : Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rush’d |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2011 |
| Journal | The Review of Metaphysics |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 41–61 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, al-Ġazālī, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Michael Sweeney |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The philosophical affirmation of essence by Al-Farabi (his preferred position) and Ibn Rush'd allows for toleration of rehgion as an inferior but necessary way of life for most human beings. Since both AlFarabi's democracy and his political regime based on essence achieve varying degrees of tolerance by subordinating rehgion, the choice is between tolerance and the superiority of rehgion; that is, all agree that it is not possible to reconcile the supremacy of religion with a broad political tolerance. According to Al-Farabi, the question of tolerance, like the questions of politics in general, centers on the natural differences among human beings in their ability to grasp essence. |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/23055682 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5377","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5377,"authors_free":[{"id":6229,"entry_id":5377,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Michael Sweeney","free_first_name":"Michael","free_last_name":"Sweeney","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Greek essence and Islamic Tolerance : Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rush\u2019d","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Greek essence and Islamic Tolerance : Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rush\u2019d"},"abstract":"The philosophical affirmation of essence by Al-Farabi (his preferred position) and Ibn Rush'd allows for toleration of rehgion as an inferior but necessary way of life for most human beings. Since both AlFarabi's democracy and his political regime based on essence achieve varying degrees of tolerance by subordinating rehgion, the choice is between tolerance and the superiority of rehgion; that is, all agree that it is not possible to reconcile the supremacy of religion with a broad political tolerance. According to Al-Farabi, the question of tolerance, like the questions of politics in general, centers on the natural differences among human beings in their ability to grasp essence.","btype":3,"date":"2011","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/23055682","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5377,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Review of Metaphysics","volume":"65","issue":"1","pages":"41\u201361"}},"sort":["Greek essence and Islamic Tolerance : Al-Farabi, Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rush\u2019d"]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd and his Criticism for Esh’arism |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2010 |
| Journal | Journal of Islamic Research |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 82-97 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Theology, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Orhan Atalay |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5335","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5335,"authors_free":[{"id":6181,"entry_id":5335,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Orhan Atalay","free_first_name":"Orhan ","free_last_name":"Atalay","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd and his Criticism for Esh\u2019arism","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd and his Criticism for Esh\u2019arism"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2010","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5335,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic Research","volume":"3","issue":"2 ","pages":" 82-97"}},"sort":["Ibn Rushd and his Criticism for Esh\u2019arism"]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd versus Al-Ghazālī. Reconsideration of a Polemic |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1992 |
| Journal | The Muslim World |
| Volume | 82 |
| Pages | 113–131 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | Josep Puig Montada |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"945","_score":null,"_source":{"id":945,"authors_free":[{"id":1114,"entry_id":945,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":343,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Josep Puig Montada","free_first_name":"Josep","free_last_name":"Puig Montada","norm_person":{"id":343,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Josep Puig Montada","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/188325034","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61625512","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Josep Puig Montada"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd versus Al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b. Reconsideration of a Polemic","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd versus Al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b. Reconsideration of a Polemic"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1992","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":343,"full_name":"Josep Puig Montada","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":945,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Muslim World","volume":"82","issue":null,"pages":"113\u2013131"}},"sort":["Ibn Rushd versus Al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b. Reconsideration of a Polemic"]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd's Response to al-Ghazālī's Refutations of the Philosophers' Conception of an Agent in the Theory of Emanation |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1993 |
| Journal | Hamdard islamicus |
| Volume | 16 |
| Pages | 25–39 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | Mohammed Yusoff Hussain |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"565","_score":null,"_source":{"id":565,"authors_free":[{"id":715,"entry_id":565,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":826,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mohammed Yusoff Hussain","free_first_name":"Mohammed Yusoff","free_last_name":"Hussain","norm_person":{"id":826,"first_name":"Mohammed Yusoff","last_name":"Hussein","full_name":"Mohammed Yusoff Hussein","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1135936765","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mohammed Yusoff Hussein"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd's Response to al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b's Refutations of the Philosophers' Conception of an Agent in the Theory of Emanation","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd's Response to al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b's Refutations of the Philosophers' Conception of an Agent in the Theory of Emanation"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1993","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":826,"full_name":"Mohammed Yusoff Hussein","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":565,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Hamdard islamicus","volume":"16","issue":null,"pages":"25\u201339"}},"sort":["Ibn Rushd's Response to al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b's Refutations of the Philosophers' Conception of an Agent in the Theory of Emanation"]}
| Title | Il manoscritto della Destructio destructionum di Averroè appartenuto a Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (Napoli, Biblioteca Nazionale, VIII E 31) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2018 |
| Journal | Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale |
| Volume | 60 |
| Pages | 67–80 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Transmission, Renaissance |
| Author(s) | Giovanna Murano |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The Tahāfut al-tahāfut is Averroes' response to the Tahāfut al-falāsifa (The Incoherence of the Philosopher) written by Abū Hāmid al-Ghazālī. The work in its Latin translation from the Arabic was entitled Destructio destructionum, and an incomplete edition of this translation was published by Agostino Nifo in 1497. The MS. Naples, Biblioteca Nazionale, VIII E 31, unknown until now to scholars, belonged to Giovanni Pico della Mirandola. It is a manuscript of the Destructio destructionum, translated into Latin in 1328 by Calonymos ben Calonymos ben Meir of Arles for Robert of Anjou, and extensively annotated by Pico. The manuscript differs from Nifos' edition in that it also includes the second part of the Destructio destructionum with the until-now unpublished disputations on the natural sciences. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5099","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5099,"authors_free":[{"id":5873,"entry_id":5099,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Giovanna Murano","free_first_name":"Giovanna","free_last_name":"Murano","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Il manoscritto della Destructio destructionum di Averro\u00e8 appartenuto a Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (Napoli, Biblioteca Nazionale, VIII E 31)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Il manoscritto della Destructio destructionum di Averro\u00e8 appartenuto a Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (Napoli, Biblioteca Nazionale, VIII E 31)"},"abstract":"The Tah\u0101fut al-tah\u0101fut is Averroes' response to the Tah\u0101fut al-fal\u0101sifa (The Incoherence of the Philosopher) written by Ab\u016b H\u0101mid al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b. The work in its Latin translation from the Arabic was entitled Destructio destructionum, and an incomplete edition of this translation was published by Agostino Nifo in 1497.\r\n\r\nThe MS. Naples, Biblioteca Nazionale, VIII E 31, unknown until now to scholars, belonged to Giovanni Pico della Mirandola. It is a manuscript of the Destructio destructionum, translated into Latin in 1328 by Calonymos ben Calonymos ben Meir of Arles for Robert of Anjou, and extensively annotated by Pico. The manuscript differs from Nifos' edition in that it also includes the second part of the Destructio destructionum with the until-now unpublished disputations on the natural sciences.","btype":3,"date":"2018","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"},{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5099,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Bulletin de Philosophie M\u00e9di\u00e9vale","volume":"60","issue":"","pages":"67\u201380"}},"sort":["Il manoscritto della Destructio destructionum di Averro\u00e8 appartenuto a Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (Napoli, Biblioteca Nazionale, VIII E 31)"]}
| Title | Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Arabic |
| Date | 2022 |
| Journal | Comparative Theology |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 27 |
| Pages | 1-16 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Influence, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Abuzar Rajabi , Morsal Azizi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Islamic thinkers do not think alike about understanding similar verses and the issue of the appearance and interiority of verses, and sometimes there are fundamental differences between them. Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are in favor of using the method of interpretation in understanding similar verses and considering the way of escaping from the challenge and conflict of appearance and the inner self using the approach of interpretation. Ibn Rushd was famous for opposing Al-Ghazali and writing the book Tahaft Al-Tahaft in his critique of Tahaft al-Ghazali philosophers. Despite the criticisms, he is influenced by Al-Ghazali in some cases, and especially in the matter of interpretation. Al-Ghazali has two approaches encountering the problem of interpretation in two intellectual periods, in both of which he has been able to provide a new model by presenting a special approach in interpretation so that others can take a step in this direction and achieve a methodical understanding of religious texts. He has benefited a lot from this research model in understanding Ibn Rushd's text. According to the research findings, Ibn Rushd was influenced by Ghazali both in the nature of interpretation and in the reasoning and necessity of accepting it, as well as in the means of approaching interpretation. In the present descriptive-analytical study, the influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the issue of interpretation has been investigated.Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are both advocates of using the method of interpretation in understanding the text. Although Ghazali is one of the Ash'arite theologians, in the matter of interpretation in both intellectual periods, he distances himself from thinkers such as Abul Hassan Ash'ari, Baqalani, and Jovini and accepts the methodical interpretation in understanding many verses of the Holy Qur'an. Methodology and adherence to a disciplined mechanism in interpretation are the characteristics of using this method by Al-Ghazali.Ibn Al-Rushd, like Al-Ghazali, does not see a conflict between the outward and inward meaning of the verses of the Holy Qur'an. Interpretation is a method that philosophers have the right to use in understanding the Holy Qur'an. Although this method raised serious objections to Al-Ghazali, it is influenced by Al-Ghazali’s interpretation. Ibn Al-Rushd mentions Al-Ghazali in many cases and considers Ghazali's method in this regard to be correct. He speaks about the nature of interpretation, the necessity of paying attention to it, its types and varieties, the division of the audience of revelation, and the permission and impermissibility of interpretation like Al-Ghazali. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5766","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5766,"authors_free":[{"id":6678,"entry_id":5766,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Abuzar Rajabi","free_first_name":"Abuzar ","free_last_name":"Rajabi","norm_person":null},{"id":6679,"entry_id":5766,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Morsal Azizi","free_first_name":"Morsal ","free_last_name":"Azizi","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts"},"abstract":"Islamic thinkers do not think alike about understanding similar verses and the issue of the appearance and interiority of verses, and sometimes there are fundamental differences between them. Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are in favor of using the method of interpretation in understanding similar verses and considering the way of escaping from the challenge and conflict of appearance and the inner self using the approach of interpretation. Ibn Rushd was famous for opposing Al-Ghazali and writing the book Tahaft Al-Tahaft in his critique of Tahaft al-Ghazali philosophers. Despite the criticisms, he is influenced by Al-Ghazali in some cases, and especially in the matter of interpretation. Al-Ghazali has two approaches encountering the problem of interpretation in two intellectual periods, in both of which he has been able to provide a new model by presenting a special approach in interpretation so that others can take a step in this direction and achieve a methodical understanding of religious texts. He has benefited a lot from this research model in understanding Ibn Rushd's text. According to the research findings, Ibn Rushd was influenced by Ghazali both in the nature of interpretation and in the reasoning and necessity of accepting it, as well as in the means of approaching interpretation. In the present descriptive-analytical study, the influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the issue of interpretation has been investigated.Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd are both advocates of using the method of interpretation in understanding the text. Although Ghazali is one of the Ash'arite theologians, in the matter of interpretation in both intellectual periods, he distances himself from thinkers such as Abul Hassan Ash'ari, Baqalani, and Jovini and accepts the methodical interpretation in understanding many verses of the Holy Qur'an. Methodology and adherence to a disciplined mechanism in interpretation are the characteristics of using this method by Al-Ghazali.Ibn Al-Rushd, like Al-Ghazali, does not see a conflict between the outward and inward meaning of the verses of the Holy Qur'an. Interpretation is a method that philosophers have the right to use in understanding the Holy Qur'an. Although this method raised serious objections to Al-Ghazali, it is influenced by Al-Ghazali\u2019s interpretation. Ibn Al-Rushd mentions Al-Ghazali in many cases and considers Ghazali's method in this regard to be correct. He speaks about the nature of interpretation, the necessity of paying attention to it, its types and varieties, the division of the audience of revelation, and the permission and impermissibility of interpretation like Al-Ghazali.","btype":3,"date":"2022","language":"Arabic","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.22108\/coth.2022.131221.1658","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5766,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Comparative Theology","volume":"13","issue":"27","pages":"1-16"}},"sort":["Investigating the Influence of Ibn Rushd from Ghazali on the Issue of Interpretation of Religious Texts"]}
| Title | La crítica de Al-Gazzali al racionalismo filosófico islámico y la refutación de Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2012 |
| Journal | La Ciudad de Díos |
| Volume | 225 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 161–188 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | Andrés Martínez Lorca |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1786","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1786,"authors_free":[{"id":2060,"entry_id":1786,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":756,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","free_first_name":"Andr\u00e9s","free_last_name":"Mart\u00ednez Lorca","norm_person":{"id":756,"first_name":"Andr\u00e9s","last_name":"Mart\u00ednez Lorca","full_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1047955687","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51730671","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca"}}],"entry_title":"La cr\u00edtica de Al-Gazzali al racionalismo filos\u00f3fico isl\u00e1mico y la refutaci\u00f3n de Averroes","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"La cr\u00edtica de Al-Gazzali al racionalismo filos\u00f3fico isl\u00e1mico y la refutaci\u00f3n de Averroes"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2012","language":"Spanish","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":756,"full_name":"Andr\u00e9s Mart\u00ednez Lorca","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1786,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"La Ciudad de D\u00edos","volume":"225","issue":"1","pages":"161\u2013188"}},"sort":["La cr\u00edtica de Al-Gazzali al racionalismo filos\u00f3fico isl\u00e1mico y la refutaci\u00f3n de Averroes"]}
| Title | La philosophie comme pratique: erreur et droit à l’erreur dans la pensée d’Averroès |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2016 |
| Journal | Les Études Philosophiques |
| Volume | 117 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 269–282 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Law |
| Author(s) | Ziad Bou Akl |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Responding to the accusations of the Ašʿarite theologian al-Ġazālī, in his Decisive Treatise Averroes champions the practice of philosophy, using legal and scriptural arguments. In this article, I wish to place these arguments within the context of legal theory, a discipline to which Averroes devoted one of his earliest treatises, the Abridgment of al-Mustaṣfā . A comparison of these two texts allows us to identify the origin of some arguments of the Decisive Treatise, concerning the taxonomy of errors and the social organization of knowledge. My aim is to set Averroes’ reflection within a continuity of the Islamic meta-legal tradition that provided him with the necessary tools for his conceptualization of the philosopher’s place within society. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5217","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5217,"authors_free":[{"id":6019,"entry_id":5217,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1608,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ziad Bou Akl","free_first_name":"Ziad","free_last_name":"Bou Akl","norm_person":{"id":1608,"first_name":"Ziad","last_name":"Bou Akl","full_name":"Ziad Bou Akl","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1105658635","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/306483990","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Ziad Bou Akl"}}],"entry_title":"La philosophie comme pratique: erreur et droit \u00e0 l\u2019erreur dans la pens\u00e9e d\u2019Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La philosophie comme pratique: erreur et droit \u00e0 l\u2019erreur dans la pens\u00e9e d\u2019Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"Responding to the accusations of the A\u0161\u02bfarite theologian al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b, in his Decisive Treatise Averroes champions the practice of philosophy, using legal and scriptural arguments. In this article, I wish to place these arguments within the context of legal theory, a discipline to which Averroes devoted one of his earliest treatises, the Abridgment of al-Musta\u1e63f\u0101 . A comparison of these two texts allows us to identify the origin of some arguments of the Decisive Treatise, concerning the taxonomy of errors and the social organization of knowledge. My aim is to set Averroes\u2019 reflection within a continuity of the Islamic meta-legal tradition that provided him with the necessary tools for his conceptualization of the philosopher\u2019s place within society.","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.3917\/leph.162.0269","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"}],"authors":[{"id":1608,"full_name":"Ziad Bou Akl","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5217,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Les \u00c9tudes Philosophiques","volume":"117","issue":"2","pages":"269\u2013282"}},"sort":["La philosophie comme pratique: erreur et droit \u00e0 l\u2019erreur dans la pens\u00e9e d\u2019Averro\u00e8s"]}
| Title | La risposta di Averroé alla XIV quaestio del « Tahafut » di Ghazālī intorno al movimento celeste |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 1979 |
| Journal | Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica |
| Volume | 71 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 497-507 |
| Categories | Relation between Philosophy and Theology, Physics, al-Ġazālī |
| Author(s) | Giulio A. Lucchetta |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/43060777 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5713","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5713,"authors_free":[{"id":6621,"entry_id":5713,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1880,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Giulio A. Lucchetta","free_first_name":"Giulio A. ","free_last_name":"Lucchetta","norm_person":{"id":1880,"first_name":"Giulio A. ","last_name":"Lucchetta","full_name":"Giulio A. Lucchetta","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1204033293","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Giulio A. Lucchetta"}}],"entry_title":"La risposta di Averro\u00e9 alla XIV quaestio del \u00ab Tahafut \u00bb di Ghaz\u0101l\u012b intorno al movimento celeste","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La risposta di Averro\u00e9 alla XIV quaestio del \u00ab Tahafut \u00bb di Ghaz\u0101l\u012b intorno al movimento celeste"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1979","language":"Italian","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/43060777","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"}],"authors":[{"id":1880,"full_name":"Giulio A. Lucchetta","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5713,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica","volume":"71","issue":"3","pages":" 497-507"}},"sort":["La risposta di Averro\u00e9 alla XIV quaestio del \u00ab Tahafut \u00bb di Ghaz\u0101l\u012b intorno al movimento celeste"]}