| Title | The Iberian earthquake(s) of 1169-1184 according to Ibn Rushd (Averroes) and others |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Seismological Research Letters |
| Volume | 90 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 2285-2292 |
| Categories | Natural Philosophy |
| Author(s) | David J. Wasserstein |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Ibn Rushd (Averroes) (1126-1198), the famous Muslim philosopher, reported an earthquake in the region of Cordoba (Spain) in the twelfth century. The information in his reports is self-contradictory. We have several other reports of the same event, which are themselves not always very clear. I am now attempting to clarify the problems and offer an analysis of the available information. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5569","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5569,"authors_free":[{"id":6463,"entry_id":5569,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":1848,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"David J. Wasserstein","free_first_name":"David J.","free_last_name":"Wasserstein","norm_person":{"id":1848,"first_name":"David J. ","last_name":"Wasserstein","full_name":"David J. Wasserstein","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1089175388","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=David J. Wasserstein"}}],"entry_title":"The Iberian earthquake(s) of 1169-1184 according to Ibn Rushd (Averroes) and others","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Iberian earthquake(s) of 1169-1184 according to Ibn Rushd (Averroes) and others"},"abstract":"Ibn Rushd (Averroes) (1126-1198), the famous Muslim philosopher, reported an earthquake in the region of Cordoba (Spain) in the twelfth century. The information in his reports is self-contradictory. We have several other reports of the same event, which are themselves not always very clear. I am now attempting to clarify the problems and offer an analysis of the available information.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1785\/0220180359","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"}],"authors":[{"id":1848,"full_name":"David J. Wasserstein","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5569,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Seismological Research Letters","volume":"90","issue":"6","pages":"2285-2292"}},"sort":[2019]}
| This article examines Andrea di Bonaiuto’s image of Averroes in the Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Spanish Chapel, Florence: 1365–69), explored alongside Bonaiuto’s primary visual source, Lippo Memmi’s panel painting, Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Pisa, c. 1323–30), and Dante’s Commedia. I argue that Bonaiuto’s ico-nography, developed within a Dominican context, is unique to the Spanish Chapel Triumph because it propagates Averroes as both a heterodox philosopher and a heretical Muslim precisely at a time when the Arab philosopher was acclaimed as the Great Commentator. Through comparative analysis, I demonstrate that Bonaiuto makes significant modifications to Memmi’s Triumph, the panel painting which first establishes an Aquinas-Averroes iconographic formula created to uphold the orthodoxy of Thomistic Aristotelianism by casting Averroes into a contemptible position, a formula also utilised by Benozzo Gozzoli in a later Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Pisa, c. 1470–75). I argue that Memmi’s image of Averroes can be read as a Dominican comment on the heterodoxy of Arabic Aristotelianism in spite of its widespread reception into Latin scholasticism. This feature is further developed by Bonaiuto who presents Averroes as an indolent philosopher and in a departure from Memmi’s formula, as a heretical Muslim. Such a reading is further elucidated when Bonaiuto’s Triumph is considered alongside Dante’s literary treatment of Arabic philosophers, the Prophet Muhammad, and Christian heresy in the Commedia, ultimately revealing that the reception of Ar-abic philosophers is entangled with Islam in a far more complex and ambiguous manner than once considered. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5572","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5572,"authors_free":[{"id":6466,"entry_id":5572,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Shazia Jagot","free_first_name":"Shazia","free_last_name":"Jagot","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Averroes, Islam, and Heterodoxy in the Spanish Chapel Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes, Islam, and Heterodoxy in the Spanish Chapel Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas"},"abstract":"This article examines Andrea di Bonaiuto\u2019s image of Averroes in the Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Spanish Chapel, Florence: 1365\u201369), explored alongside Bonaiuto\u2019s primary visual source, Lippo Memmi\u2019s panel painting, Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Pisa, c. 1323\u201330), and Dante\u2019s Commedia. I argue that Bonaiuto\u2019s ico-nography, developed within a Dominican context, is unique to the Spanish Chapel Triumph because it propagates Averroes as both a heterodox philosopher and a heretical Muslim precisely at a time when the Arab philosopher was acclaimed as the Great Commentator. Through comparative analysis, I demonstrate that Bonaiuto makes significant modifications to Memmi\u2019s Triumph, the panel painting which first establishes an Aquinas-Averroes iconographic formula created to uphold the orthodoxy of Thomistic Aristotelianism by casting Averroes into a contemptible position, a formula also utilised by Benozzo Gozzoli in a later Triumph of St Thomas Aquinas (Pisa, c. 1470\u201375). I argue that Memmi\u2019s image of Averroes can be read as a Dominican comment on the heterodoxy of Arabic Aristotelianism in spite of its widespread reception into Latin scholasticism. This feature is further developed by Bonaiuto who presents Averroes as an indolent philosopher and in a departure from Memmi\u2019s formula, as a heretical Muslim. Such a reading is further elucidated when Bonaiuto\u2019s Triumph is considered alongside Dante\u2019s literary treatment of Arabic philosophers, the Prophet Muhammad, and Christian heresy in the Commedia, ultimately revealing that the reception of Ar-abic philosophers is entangled with Islam in a far more complex and ambiguous manner than once considered.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.13130\/interfaces-06-02","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5572,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Interfaces, A Journal of Medieval European Literatures","volume":"6","issue":"","pages":"7-32"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Averroes and Maimonides on Equivocal Terms in the Qur’ân and the Torah |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | The Muslim World |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 615–626 |
| Categories | Maimonides, Theology |
| Author(s) | Terence J. Kleven |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This essay is a brief exploration of the Scriptural exegesis of the most noteworthy sons of Cordoba, Averroes or Ibn Rushd (1126-1198) and Moses Maimonides or Rambam (1135-1204). We will examine the manner of their exegesis of the Scriptural texts, the Qur'an and the Torah, of their respective religious communities. Although Averroes is nine years older than Maimonides, they are near contemporaries. We do not know whether in their youths these Cordobans ever met; they will emerge as two of the most renowned scholars and judges of their communities. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5095","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5095,"authors_free":[{"id":5868,"entry_id":5095,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1332,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Terence J. Kleven","free_first_name":"Terence J. ","free_last_name":"Kleven","norm_person":{"id":1332,"first_name":"Terence J.","last_name":"Kleven","full_name":"Terence J. Kleven","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1050705157","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/308213722","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Terence J. Kleven"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and Maimonides on Equivocal Terms in the Qur\u2019\u00e2n and the Torah","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and Maimonides on Equivocal Terms in the Qur\u2019\u00e2n and the Torah"},"abstract":"This essay is a brief exploration of the Scriptural exegesis of the most noteworthy sons of Cordoba, Averroes or Ibn Rushd (1126-1198) and Moses Maimonides or Rambam (1135-1204). We will examine the manner of their exegesis of the Scriptural texts, the Qur'an and the Torah, of their respective religious communities. Although Averroes is nine years older than Maimonides, they are near contemporaries. We do not know whether in their youths these Cordobans ever met; they will emerge as two of the most renowned scholars and judges of their communities.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":" https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/muwo.12313","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":9,"category_name":"Maimonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Maimonides"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1332,"full_name":"Terence J. Kleven","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5095,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Muslim World","volume":"109","issue":"4","pages":"615\u2013626"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Ibn Rushd’s the Decisive Treatise (1126–98) is widely acknowledged as an important text for understanding his legal ideas, with some scholars describing this text as a legal opinion (fatwa) issued for the Malikite jurists of that period. Contrastingly, I argue that the Decisive Treatise forms part of Ibn Rushd’s broader vision for political reform, and should thus be reconsidered as an important text for understanding his ideas on political authority. Whilst Ibn Rushd persisted in advancing the Almohad policy of reform, by calling on the religious scholars who occupied an important space in Almohad society to relinquish their narrow positions on how to understand and interpret Islamic Law, he went further in devising his own guidelines for reform. This constituted an argument that Greek ideas, and the wisdom of the ancient philosophers, are not only compatible with Islamic principles but also stand to offer much-needed guidance. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5770","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5770,"authors_free":[{"id":6683,"entry_id":5770,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ayesha Omar","free_first_name":"Ayesha ","free_last_name":"Omar","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s The Decisive Treatise: A Text for Political Reform","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s The Decisive Treatise: A Text for Political Reform"},"abstract":"Ibn Rushd\u2019s the Decisive Treatise (1126\u201398) is widely acknowledged as an important text for understanding his legal ideas, with some scholars describing this text as a legal opinion (fatwa) issued for the Malikite jurists of that period. Contrastingly, I argue that the Decisive Treatise forms part of Ibn Rushd\u2019s broader vision for political reform, and should thus be reconsidered as an important text for understanding his ideas on political authority. Whilst Ibn Rushd persisted in advancing the Almohad policy of reform, by calling on the religious scholars who occupied an important space in Almohad society to relinquish their narrow positions on how to understand and interpret Islamic Law, he went further in devising his own guidelines for reform. This constituted an argument that Greek ideas, and the wisdom of the ancient philosophers, are not only compatible with Islamic principles but also stand to offer much-needed guidance.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/0971945818801398","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5770,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Medieval History Journal","volume":"22","issue":"1","pages":"131-155"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Averroismi al plurale, II. La ricezione del Commento grande al De anima di Ibn Rushd nelle Quaestiones in tertium de anima di Sigieri di Brabante |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Dianoia |
| Volume | 28 |
| Pages | 81–94 |
| Categories | Siger of Brabant, De anima |
| Author(s) | Federico Minzoni |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Siger of Brabant sketches in his Quaestiones in tertium de anima (ca. 1269) a noetic theory defending the unity of the intellect that is usually considered as a latin formulation of Ibn Rušd’s theory of the separateness of the material intellect as put forth in the Long Commentary on the De anima (ca. 1186). A closer look at key texts in both the Quaestiones and the Long Commentary will give us a quite different picture: while Siger works out his theory on the background of a dualistic anthropology that takes the union between the intellective soul (conceived as an hoc aliquid) and the human body to be only operational, Ibn Rušd (who develops his theory starting from strictly aristotelic epistemological premises) repeatedly stresses throughout the Long Commentary that, if man is an agent of thought, the union between the separate intellects and the thinking individual ought to be always hylomorphic. This paper aims at showing that, although Siger has often been identified as an averroist, his psychology is certainly not rushdian. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5014","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5014,"authors_free":[{"id":5750,"entry_id":5014,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Federico Minzoni","free_first_name":"Federico","free_last_name":"Minzoni","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Averroismi al plurale, II. La ricezione del Commento grande al De anima di Ibn Rushd nelle Quaestiones in tertium de anima di Sigieri di Brabante","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroismi al plurale, II. La ricezione del Commento grande al De anima di Ibn Rushd nelle Quaestiones in tertium de anima di Sigieri di Brabante"},"abstract":"Siger of Brabant sketches in his Quaestiones in tertium de anima (ca. 1269) a noetic theory defending the unity of the intellect that is usually considered as a latin formulation of Ibn Ru\u0161d\u2019s theory of the separateness of the material intellect as put forth in the Long Commentary on the De anima (ca. 1186). A closer look at key texts in both the Quaestiones and the Long Commentary will give us a quite different picture: while Siger works out his theory on the background of a dualistic anthropology that takes the union between the intellective soul (conceived as an hoc aliquid) and the human body to be only operational, Ibn Ru\u0161d (who develops his theory starting from strictly aristotelic epistemological premises) repeatedly stresses throughout the Long Commentary that, if man is an agent of thought, the union between the separate intellects and the thinking individual ought to be always hylomorphic. This paper aims at showing that, although Siger has often been identified as an averroist, his psychology is certainly not rushdian. ","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":57,"category_name":"Siger of Brabant","link":"bib?categories[]=Siger of Brabant"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5014,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Dianoia","volume":"28","issue":"","pages":"81\u201394"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Problemi della tradizione a stampa del De substantia orbis di Averroè |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia, V Serie |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 559–580 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Giovanni Licata |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5052","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5052,"authors_free":[{"id":5802,"entry_id":5052,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1599,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Giovanni Licata","free_first_name":"Giovanni ","free_last_name":"Licata","norm_person":{"id":1599,"first_name":"Giovanni","last_name":"Licata","full_name":"Giovanni Licata","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1128655918","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/306437659","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Giovanni Licata"}}],"entry_title":"Problemi della tradizione a stampa del De substantia orbis di Averro\u00e8","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Problemi della tradizione a stampa del De substantia orbis di Averro\u00e8"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":1599,"full_name":"Giovanni Licata","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5052,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa. Classe di Lettere e Filosofia, V Serie","volume":"11","issue":"2","pages":"559\u2013580"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | La doctrina general de los trascendentales en Dietrich von Freiberg, y su filiación aristotélico-averroísta |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 659–681 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Metaphysics, Avicenna, Tradition and Reception, Latin Averroism, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Fernanda Ocampo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The Aristotelian text Metaphysics IV, 2, and the interpretations carried out by the Muslim philosophers, i.e., Avicenna and Averroes, constitute the theoretical framework in which several Latin authors of the second half of the 13th century from the University of Paris, who have taken a stance around the question of the ‘real distinction’ between esse and essentia, elaborated their doctrines about transcendentals. According to this, our work seeks to trace the dependence of Dietrich’s general doctrine of the transcendentals, with respect to the theses established by Aristotle in the mentioned text, and in particular, with regard to the Averroist reading – critical of that of Avicenna’s –, which “has made school” in the Parisian environment, especially among the teachers and students of the Faculty of Arts, but also, first, in Thomas Aquinas. Thus, in light of this scenario of readings and interpretations, we will seek to delimit the central features of the Theodorian conception of the communia, pointing out the possible differences or coincidences with respect to the doctrines of these preceding authors. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5060","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5060,"authors_free":[{"id":5813,"entry_id":5060,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fernanda Ocampo","free_first_name":"Fernanda ","free_last_name":"Ocampo","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"La doctrina general de los trascendentales en Dietrich von Freiberg, y su filiaci\u00f3n aristot\u00e9lico-averro\u00edsta","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"La doctrina general de los trascendentales en Dietrich von Freiberg, y su filiaci\u00f3n aristot\u00e9lico-averro\u00edsta"},"abstract":"The Aristotelian text Metaphysics IV, 2, and the interpretations carried out by the Muslim philosophers, i.e., Avicenna and Averroes, constitute the theoretical framework in which several Latin authors of the second half of the 13th century from the University of Paris, who have taken a stance around the question of the \u2018real distinction\u2019 between esse and essentia, elaborated their doctrines about transcendentals. According to this, our work seeks to trace the dependence of Dietrich\u2019s general doctrine of the transcendentals, with respect to the theses established by Aristotle in the mentioned text, and in particular, with regard to the Averroist reading \u2013 critical of that of Avicenna\u2019s \u2013, which \u201chas made school\u201d in the Parisian environment, especially among the teachers and students of the Faculty of Arts, but also, first, in Thomas Aquinas. Thus, in light of this scenario of readings and interpretations, we will seek to delimit the central features of the Theodorian conception of the communia, pointing out the possible differences or coincidences with respect to the doctrines of these preceding authors.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/dx.doi.org\/10.5209\/ashf.63089","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":7,"category_name":"Latin Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Latin Averroism"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5060,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Anales del Seminario de Historia de la Filosof\u00eda","volume":"36","issue":"3","pages":"659\u2013681"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Ibn Sînâ and Ibn Rushd on Essence and Existence: A Critical Analysis |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Ishraq |
| Volume | 9 |
| Pages | 13–22 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Metaphysics, Ontology |
| Author(s) | Ahmad Ahmadi |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5064","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5064,"authors_free":[{"id":5820,"entry_id":5064,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ahmad Ahmadi","free_first_name":" Ahmad","free_last_name":"Ahmadi","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Ibn S\u00een\u00e2 and Ibn Rushd on Essence and Existence: A Critical Analysis","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn S\u00een\u00e2 and Ibn Rushd on Essence and Existence: A Critical Analysis"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":65,"category_name":"Ontology","link":"bib?categories[]=Ontology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5064,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Ishraq","volume":"9","issue":"","pages":"13\u201322"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Ibn Rushd in the Hanbalî Tradition. Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya and the Continuity of Philosophy in Muslim Contexts |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | The Muslim World |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 561–581 |
| Categories | Tradition and Reception, Influence |
| Author(s) | Fouad Ben Ahmed |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5069","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5069,"authors_free":[{"id":5829,"entry_id":5069,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1440,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","free_first_name":"Fouad ","free_last_name":"Ben Ahmed","norm_person":{"id":1440,"first_name":"Fouad","last_name":"Ben Ahmed","full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","short_ident":"FouBen","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fouad Ben Ahmed"}}],"entry_title":"Ibn Rushd in the Hanbal\u00ee Tradition. Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya and the Continuity of Philosophy in Muslim Contexts","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Ibn Rushd in the Hanbal\u00ee Tradition. Ibn Taymiyya and Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya and the Continuity of Philosophy in Muslim Contexts"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":" https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/muwo.12310","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":24,"category_name":"Influence","link":"bib?categories[]=Influence"}],"authors":[{"id":1440,"full_name":"Fouad Ben Ahmed","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5069,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Muslim World","volume":"109","issue":"4","pages":"561\u2013581"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd’s Solution to the Problem of the “Virtuous Society” |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 43–65 |
| Categories | Politics, Law, Commentary, Plato |
| Author(s) | Jaan S. Islam |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article is an analysis of the political thought of Ibn Rushd and its significance for the current conflict in Islamic political thought between liberal, secular and conservative Islamist thinkers over the meaning of the “virtuous society” and how it can be implemented. It is argued that the thought of Ibn Rushd offers a concept of the virtuous society that reconciles secular law and religious Sharī‘a law. The article analyzes Ibn Rushd’s Commentary on Plato’s Republic, and assesses it as potentially being able to reconcile the philosophical conflict between logically discerned law and revealed law. It is contended that the separation between “religious” and “political” (i.e., philosophical) domains often attributed to Ibn Rushd does not fully consider the entirety of Ibn Rushd’s writings and interprets his works without regard for their historical and religious contextual significance. |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2979/jims.4.1.02 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.2979/jims.4.1.02 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5078","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5078,"authors_free":[{"id":5839,"entry_id":5078,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jaan S. Islam","free_first_name":"Jaan S. ","free_last_name":"Islam","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd\u2019s Solution to the Problem of the \u201cVirtuous Society\u201d","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The Contention between Secular and Revealed Law: Analyzing Ibn Rushd\u2019s Solution to the Problem of the \u201cVirtuous Society\u201d"},"abstract":"This article is an analysis of the political thought of Ibn Rushd and its significance for the current conflict in Islamic political thought between liberal, secular and conservative Islamist thinkers over the meaning of the \u201cvirtuous society\u201d and how it can be implemented. It is argued that the thought of Ibn Rushd offers a concept of the virtuous society that reconciles secular law and religious Shar\u012b\u2018a law. The article analyzes Ibn Rushd\u2019s Commentary on Plato\u2019s Republic, and assesses it as potentially being able to reconcile the philosophical conflict between logically discerned law and revealed law. It is contended that the separation between \u201creligious\u201d and \u201cpolitical\u201d (i.e., philosophical) domains often attributed to Ibn Rushd does not fully consider the entirety of Ibn Rushd\u2019s writings and interprets his works without regard for their historical and religious contextual significance.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/10.2979\/jims.4.1.02","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.2979\/jims.4.1.02 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":20,"category_name":"Plato","link":"bib?categories[]=Plato"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5078,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Islamic and Muslim Studies","volume":"4","issue":"1","pages":"43\u201365"}},"sort":[2019]}
| Title | Aristotle's Poetics, the Poetic Syllogism, and Philosophical Truth in Averroes's Commentary |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2001 |
| Journal | Journal of Value Inquiry |
| Volume | 35 |
| Pages | 391–412 |
| Categories | Poetics |
| Author(s) | Salim Kemal |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"735","_score":null,"_source":{"id":735,"authors_free":[{"id":894,"entry_id":735,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":927,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Salim Kemal","free_first_name":"Salim","free_last_name":"Kemal","norm_person":{"id":927,"first_name":"Salim","last_name":"Kemal","full_name":"Salim Kemal","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/113359926","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/71419307","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Salim Kemal"}}],"entry_title":"Aristotle's Poetics, the Poetic Syllogism, and Philosophical Truth in Averroes's Commentary","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Aristotle's Poetics, the Poetic Syllogism, and Philosophical Truth in Averroes's Commentary"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2001","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":44,"category_name":"Poetics","link":"bib?categories[]=Poetics"}],"authors":[{"id":927,"full_name":"Salim Kemal","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":735,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Journal of Value Inquiry","volume":"35","issue":null,"pages":"391\u2013412"}},"sort":["Aristotle's Poetics, the Poetic Syllogism, and Philosophical Truth in Averroes's Commentary"]}
| Title | Aristotle's Theology and its Influence on the Philosophers of Islam, Judaism and Christianity |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1993 |
| Journal | Dialogue and Humanism |
| Volume | 3 |
| Pages | 11–23 |
| Categories | Cosmology, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Constantine Georgiadis |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"422","_score":null,"_source":{"id":422,"authors_free":[{"id":564,"entry_id":422,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":736,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Constantine Georgiadis","free_first_name":"Constantine","free_last_name":"Georgiadis","norm_person":{"id":736,"first_name":"Constantine","last_name":"Georgiadis","full_name":"Constantine Georgiadis","short_ident":"ConGeo","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Constantine Georgiadis"}}],"entry_title":"Aristotle's Theology and its Influence on the Philosophers of Islam, Judaism and Christianity","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Aristotle's Theology and its Influence on the Philosophers of Islam, Judaism and Christianity"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1993","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":19,"category_name":"Cosmology","link":"bib?categories[]=Cosmology"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":736,"full_name":"Constantine Georgiadis","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":422,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Dialogue and Humanism","volume":"3","issue":null,"pages":"11\u201323"}},"sort":["Aristotle's Theology and its Influence on the Philosophers of Islam, Judaism and Christianity"]}
| Title | Aristotle, Al-Farabi, Averroes and Aquinas. Four Views on Philosophy and Religion |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1980 |
| Journal | Sind University Research Journal. Arts Series, Humanities, Social Sciences |
| Volume | 19 |
| Pages | 1–20 |
| Categories | al-Fārābī, Aquinas |
| Author(s) | Shafqat A. Shah , Shafqat A. Shah |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"949","_score":null,"_source":{"id":949,"authors_free":[{"id":1118,"entry_id":949,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1044,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Shafqat A. Shah","free_first_name":"Shafqat A.","free_last_name":"Shah","norm_person":{"id":1044,"first_name":"Shafqat A.","last_name":"Shah","full_name":"Shafqat A. Shah","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Shafqat A. Shah"}},{"id":1119,"entry_id":949,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1044,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Shafqat A. Shah","free_first_name":"Shafqat A.","free_last_name":"Shah","norm_person":{"id":1044,"first_name":"Shafqat A.","last_name":"Shah","full_name":"Shafqat A. Shah","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Shafqat A. Shah"}}],"entry_title":"Aristotle, Al-Farabi, Averroes and Aquinas. Four Views on Philosophy and Religion","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Aristotle, Al-Farabi, Averroes and Aquinas. Four Views on Philosophy and Religion"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1980","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":1044,"full_name":"Shafqat A. Shah","role":1},{"id":1044,"full_name":"Shafqat A. Shah","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":949,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Sind University Research Journal. Arts Series, Humanities, Social Sciences","volume":"19","issue":null,"pages":"1\u201320"}},"sort":["Aristotle, Al-Farabi, Averroes and Aquinas. Four Views on Philosophy and Religion"]}
| Title | Aristotle, Averroes and Thomas Aquinas on the Nature of Essence |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2003 |
| Journal | Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
| Volume | 14 |
| Pages | 79–122 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Aristotle, Aquinas |
| Author(s) | Fabrizio Amerini |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"542","_score":null,"_source":{"id":542,"authors_free":[{"id":689,"entry_id":542,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":812,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fabrizio Amerini","free_first_name":"Fabrizio","free_last_name":"Amerini","norm_person":{"id":812,"first_name":"Fabrizio","last_name":"Amerini","full_name":"Fabrizio Amerini","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1037880641","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61802005","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd1037880641.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fabrizio Amerini"}}],"entry_title":"Aristotle, Averroes and Thomas Aquinas on the Nature of Essence","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Aristotle, Averroes and Thomas Aquinas on the Nature of Essence"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"2003","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[{"id":812,"full_name":"Fabrizio Amerini","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":542,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"14","issue":null,"pages":"79\u2013122"}},"sort":["Aristotle, Averroes and Thomas Aquinas on the Nature of Essence"]}
| Title | Arnau de Vilanova. els limits de la raó teològica. Arnau en oposició a Averroes, Maimònides y Tomàs de Aquino |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 1989 |
| Journal | Estudi general |
| Volume | 9 |
| Pages | 31–60 |
| Categories | Theology |
| Author(s) | F. J. Fortuny |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"912","_score":null,"_source":{"id":912,"authors_free":[{"id":1080,"entry_id":912,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":902,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"F. J. Fortuny","free_first_name":"F. J.","free_last_name":"Fortuny","norm_person":{"id":902,"first_name":"Francesc J.","last_name":"Fortuny","full_name":"Francesc J. Fortuny","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/71478635","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Francesc J. Fortuny"}}],"entry_title":"Arnau de Vilanova. els limits de la ra\u00f3 teol\u00f2gica. Arnau en oposici\u00f3 a Averroes, Maim\u00f2nides y Tom\u00e0s de Aquino","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Arnau de Vilanova. els limits de la ra\u00f3 teol\u00f2gica. Arnau en oposici\u00f3 a Averroes, Maim\u00f2nides y Tom\u00e0s de Aquino"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1989","language":"French","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":902,"full_name":"Francesc J. Fortuny","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":912,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Estudi general","volume":"9","issue":null,"pages":"31\u201360"}},"sort":["Arnau de Vilanova. els limits de la ra\u00f3 teol\u00f2gica. Arnau en oposici\u00f3 a Averroes, Maim\u00f2nides y Tom\u00e0s de Aquino"]}
| Title | As it is, it is an Ax. Some Medieval Reflections on De anima II.1 |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1997 |
| Journal | Medieval Philosophy and Theology |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1–24 |
| Categories | Psychology, De anima |
| Author(s) | Mary Sirridge |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"795","_score":null,"_source":{"id":795,"authors_free":[{"id":958,"entry_id":795,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":963,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mary Sirridge","free_first_name":"Mary","free_last_name":"Sirridge","norm_person":{"id":963,"first_name":"Mary","last_name":"Sirridge","full_name":"Mary Sirridge","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/160958490","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/89742125","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Mary Sirridge"}}],"entry_title":"As it is, it is an Ax. Some Medieval Reflections on De anima II.1","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"As it is, it is an Ax. Some Medieval Reflections on De anima II.1"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1997","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[{"id":963,"full_name":"Mary Sirridge","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":795,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Medieval Philosophy and Theology","volume":"6","issue":"1","pages":"1\u201324"}},"sort":["As it is, it is an Ax. Some Medieval Reflections on De anima II.1"]}
| Title | Aspekte von Gemeinsamkeit in den Lehren Ockhams und des hlg. Thomas gegenüber dem Averroismus |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1988 |
| Journal | Prima philosophia |
| Volume | 1 |
| Pages | 218–255 |
| Categories | Averroism, Aquinas, Ockham |
| Author(s) | Wolfgang Bessner |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"292","_score":null,"_source":{"id":292,"authors_free":[{"id":428,"entry_id":292,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":619,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Wolfgang Bessner","free_first_name":"Wolfgang","free_last_name":"Bessner","norm_person":{"id":619,"first_name":"Wolfgang","last_name":"Bessner","full_name":"Wolfgang Bessner","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/106389548","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/39866592","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Wolfgang Bessner"}}],"entry_title":"Aspekte von Gemeinsamkeit in den Lehren Ockhams und des hlg. Thomas gegen\u00fcber dem Averroismus","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Aspekte von Gemeinsamkeit in den Lehren Ockhams und des hlg. Thomas gegen\u00fcber dem Averroismus"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1988","language":"German","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":3,"category_name":"Ockham","link":"bib?categories[]=Ockham"}],"authors":[{"id":619,"full_name":"Wolfgang Bessner","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":292,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Prima philosophia","volume":"1","issue":null,"pages":"218\u2013255"}},"sort":["Aspekte von Gemeinsamkeit in den Lehren Ockhams und des hlg. Thomas gegen\u00fcber dem Averroismus"]}
| Title | Assentimento religioso e Filosofia no Fasl al-maqal de Averróis |
| Translation | Religious assent and Philosophy in Averroes’ Fasl al-maqal |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Date | 2021 |
| Journal | DoisPontos |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 113-132 |
| Categories | Law, Theology, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Arthur Klik |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| O Fasl al-maqal, umas das obras originais de Averróis, se destaca por seu caráter polêmico. Sendo redigida como um pronunciamento jurídico, tem como um de seus objetivos principais analisar o estatuto da filosofia em face da Lei islâmica, ao verificar qual é a atitude que deve ser adotada por todo aquele que travar contato com as obras da antiguidade grega. Em um cenário em que a legitimidade da filosofia se coloca em questão, o diagnóstico e a solução propostos por Averróis se destacam ao apresentar uma interpretação singular da Lei ante a filosofia, concebendo a segunda como um elemento necessário para a saúde da comunidade. Este artigo pretende analisar essa interpretação, na qual três pontos se colocam na consideração da relação entre filosofia e revelação: o (1) asseguramento da possibilidade do assentimento religioso individual e (2) da manutenção do bem-estar geral junto à (3) possibilidade de se afirmar a legitimidade de um intérprete que garanta o assentimento correto aos crentes não filósofos An original work of Averroes, the Fasl al-maqal is remarked by its controversial character. Composed as a juridical statement, one of its main goals is to analyze the role of philosophy in Islamic Law determining which attitude must be adopted by those aware of the works of Greek antiquity. Facing a problematic scenario in which the legitimacy of philosophy is putted in question, the diagnosis and solution proposed by Averroes emphasizes a unique interpretation of the Law guided by Philosophy devised as a required element to achieve community welfare. This article intends to analyze that interpretation in which three points arise about the relationship between philosophy and revelation: (1) the insurance of the individual possibility of religious assent; (2) the endurance of common welfare, both associated to (3) the possibility of assert the legitimacy of an interpreter able to assure the correct assent to common believers |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5560","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5560,"authors_free":[{"id":6454,"entry_id":5560,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Arthur Klik","free_first_name":"Arthur ","free_last_name":"Klik","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Assentimento religioso e Filosofia no Fasl al-maqal de Averr\u00f3is","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"Religious assent and Philosophy in Averroes\u2019 Fasl al-maqal","main_title":{"title":"Assentimento religioso e Filosofia no Fasl al-maqal de Averr\u00f3is"},"abstract":"O Fasl al-maqal, umas das obras originais de Averr\u00f3is, se destaca por seu car\u00e1ter pol\u00eamico. Sendo redigida como um pronunciamento jur\u00eddico, tem como um de seus objetivos principais analisar o estatuto da filosofia em face da Lei isl\u00e2mica, ao verificar qual \u00e9 a atitude que deve ser adotada por todo aquele que travar contato com as obras da antiguidade grega. Em um cen\u00e1rio em que a legitimidade da filosofia se coloca em quest\u00e3o, o diagn\u00f3stico e a solu\u00e7\u00e3o propostos por Averr\u00f3is se destacam ao apresentar uma interpreta\u00e7\u00e3o singular da Lei ante a filosofia, concebendo a segunda como um elemento necess\u00e1rio para a sa\u00fade da comunidade. Este artigo pretende analisar essa interpreta\u00e7\u00e3o, na qual tr\u00eas pontos se colocam na considera\u00e7\u00e3o da rela\u00e7\u00e3o entre filosofia e revela\u00e7\u00e3o: o (1) \r\nasseguramento da possibilidade do assentimento religioso individual e (2) da manuten\u00e7\u00e3o do bem-estar geral junto \u00e0 (3) possibilidade de se afirmar a legitimidade de um int\u00e9rprete que garanta o assentimento correto aos crentes n\u00e3o fil\u00f3sofos \r\n\r\nAn original work of Averroes, the Fasl al-maqal is remarked by its controversial character. Composed as a juridical statement, one of its main goals is to analyze the role of philosophy in Islamic Law determining which attitude must be adopted by those aware of the works of Greek antiquity. Facing a problematic scenario in which the legitimacy of philosophy is putted in question, the diagnosis and solution proposed by Averroes emphasizes a unique interpretation of the Law guided by Philosophy devised as a required element to achieve community welfare. This article intends to analyze that interpretation in which three points arise about the relationship between philosophy and revelation: (1) the insurance of the individual possibility of religious assent; (2) the endurance of \r\ncommon welfare, both associated to (3) the possibility of assert the legitimacy of an interpreter able to assure the correct assent to common believers","btype":3,"date":"2021","language":"Portuguese","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":26,"category_name":"Law","link":"bib?categories[]=Law"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5560,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"DoisPontos","volume":"18","issue":"1","pages":"113-132"}},"sort":["Assentimento religioso e Filosofia no Fasl al-maqal de Averr\u00f3is"]}
| Title | Atributos divinos y el problema de la unicidad en Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Spanish |
| Date | 2020 |
| Journal | Praxis Filosófica |
| Volume | 50 |
| Pages | 65-88 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Theology |
| Author(s) | Joen Laureth Delgado Gómez , Diego Giovanni Castellanos |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| El artículo aborda la discusión acerca de la unicidad divina y la existencia de atributos, tanto en la filosofía como en la teología islámica medieval, haciendo énfasis en la obra de Averroes. Se analiza cómo en el pensamiento Islámico, al tiempo que se afirma el dogma de la unicidad divina se sostiene la existencia de atributos reales, apuntando directamente a conceptos dialecticos como unidad y multiplicidad, identidad y diferencia, o igualdad y alteridad. Así mismo, partiendo del análisis de su obra, se busca mostrar la manera en la que el pensador cordobés legitimó el uso de la razón filosófica como camino optimo y recomendado para el abordaje de las verdades religiosas. Se considera que Averroes avanzó en una doctrina teológico-filosófica particular diferente del asharismo que se estaba imponiendo en la época, resistiéndose a Al Ghazali, y reivindicando el valor la perspectiva peripatética para enriquecer el debate en el Islam. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5577","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5577,"authors_free":[{"id":6472,"entry_id":5577,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Joen Laureth Delgado G\u00f3mez","free_first_name":"Joen Laureth Delgado ","free_last_name":" G\u00f3mez","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}},{"id":6473,"entry_id":5577,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Diego Giovanni Castellanos","free_first_name":"Diego Giovanni ","free_last_name":"Castellanos","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"Atributos divinos y el problema de la unicidad en Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Atributos divinos y el problema de la unicidad en Averroes"},"abstract":"El art\u00edculo aborda la discusi\u00f3n acerca de la unicidad divina y la existencia de atributos, tanto en la filosof\u00eda como en la teolog\u00eda isl\u00e1mica medieval, haciendo \u00e9nfasis en la obra de Averroes. Se analiza c\u00f3mo en el pensamiento Isl\u00e1mico, al tiempo que se afirma el dogma de la unicidad divina se sostiene la existencia de atributos reales, apuntando directamente a conceptos dialecticos como unidad y multiplicidad, identidad y diferencia, o igualdad y alteridad. As\u00ed mismo, partiendo del an\u00e1lisis de su obra, se busca mostrar la manera en la que el pensador cordob\u00e9s legitim\u00f3 el uso de la raz\u00f3n filos\u00f3fica como camino optimo y recomendado para el abordaje de las verdades religiosas. Se considera que Averroes avanz\u00f3 en una doctrina teol\u00f3gico-filos\u00f3fica particular diferente del asharismo que se estaba imponiendo en la \u00e9poca, resisti\u00e9ndose a Al Ghazali, y reivindicando el valor la perspectiva peripat\u00e9tica para enriquecer el debate en el Islam. ","btype":3,"date":"2020","language":"Spanish","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.25100\/pfilosofica.v0i50.8838","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1},{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5577,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Praxis Filos\u00f3fica","volume":"50","issue":"","pages":"65-88"}},"sort":["Atributos divinos y el problema de la unicidad en Averroes"]}
| Title | Audacia de Sto. Tomás en la asimilación del pensamiento heterodoxo de su época |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Date | 1974 |
| Journal | Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 1/3 |
| Pages | 185-204 |
| Categories | Aquinas, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Salvador Gómez Nogales |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/40335275 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5705","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5705,"authors_free":[{"id":6613,"entry_id":5705,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":885,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Salvador G\u00f3mez Nogales","free_first_name":"Salvador ","free_last_name":"G\u00f3mez Nogales","norm_person":{"id":885,"first_name":"Salvador","last_name":"G\u00f3mez Nogales","full_name":"Salvador G\u00f3mez Nogales","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1056451130","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/51684134","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Salvador G\u00f3mez Nogales"}}],"entry_title":"Audacia de Sto. Tom\u00e1s en la asimilaci\u00f3n del pensamiento heterodoxo de su \u00e9poca","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Audacia de Sto. Tom\u00e1s en la asimilaci\u00f3n del pensamiento heterodoxo de su \u00e9poca"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1974","language":"Portuguese","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/40335275","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":885,"full_name":"Salvador G\u00f3mez Nogales","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5705,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia","volume":"30","issue":" 1\/3","pages":"185-204"}},"sort":["Audacia de Sto. Tom\u00e1s en la asimilaci\u00f3n del pensamiento heterodoxo de su \u00e9poca"]}