| Title | Il manoscritto della Destructio destructionum di Averroè appartenuto a Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (Napoli, Biblioteca Nazionale, VIII E 31) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2018 |
| Journal | Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale |
| Volume | 60 |
| Pages | 67–80 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Transmission, Renaissance |
| Author(s) | Giovanna Murano |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The Tahāfut al-tahāfut is Averroes' response to the Tahāfut al-falāsifa (The Incoherence of the Philosopher) written by Abū Hāmid al-Ghazālī. The work in its Latin translation from the Arabic was entitled Destructio destructionum, and an incomplete edition of this translation was published by Agostino Nifo in 1497. The MS. Naples, Biblioteca Nazionale, VIII E 31, unknown until now to scholars, belonged to Giovanni Pico della Mirandola. It is a manuscript of the Destructio destructionum, translated into Latin in 1328 by Calonymos ben Calonymos ben Meir of Arles for Robert of Anjou, and extensively annotated by Pico. The manuscript differs from Nifos' edition in that it also includes the second part of the Destructio destructionum with the until-now unpublished disputations on the natural sciences. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5099","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5099,"authors_free":[{"id":5873,"entry_id":5099,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Giovanna Murano","free_first_name":"Giovanna","free_last_name":"Murano","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Il manoscritto della Destructio destructionum di Averro\u00e8 appartenuto a Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (Napoli, Biblioteca Nazionale, VIII E 31)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Il manoscritto della Destructio destructionum di Averro\u00e8 appartenuto a Giovanni Pico della Mirandola (Napoli, Biblioteca Nazionale, VIII E 31)"},"abstract":"The Tah\u0101fut al-tah\u0101fut is Averroes' response to the Tah\u0101fut al-fal\u0101sifa (The Incoherence of the Philosopher) written by Ab\u016b H\u0101mid al-Ghaz\u0101l\u012b. The work in its Latin translation from the Arabic was entitled Destructio destructionum, and an incomplete edition of this translation was published by Agostino Nifo in 1497.\r\n\r\nThe MS. Naples, Biblioteca Nazionale, VIII E 31, unknown until now to scholars, belonged to Giovanni Pico della Mirandola. It is a manuscript of the Destructio destructionum, translated into Latin in 1328 by Calonymos ben Calonymos ben Meir of Arles for Robert of Anjou, and extensively annotated by Pico. The manuscript differs from Nifos' edition in that it also includes the second part of the Destructio destructionum with the until-now unpublished disputations on the natural sciences.","btype":3,"date":"2018","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":40,"category_name":"Transmission","link":"bib?categories[]=Transmission"},{"id":5,"category_name":"Renaissance","link":"bib?categories[]=Renaissance"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5099,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Bulletin de Philosophie M\u00e9di\u00e9vale","volume":"60","issue":"","pages":"67\u201380"}},"sort":[2018]}
| Title | Averroès et l'intellect matériel diaphane - Remarques sur une analogie variable |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2018 |
| Journal | Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie Médiévales |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 261–284 |
| Categories | Commentary, De anima |
| Author(s) | Jean-Baptiste Brenet |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This paper studies the analogy set forth by Averroes in his Great Commentary on the De anima between the material intellect and the transparent medium. The overall context of the present inquiry is the 'question of Theophrastus' concerning the nature of the material intellect. The paper argues that the analogy between material intellect and transparent medium arises because, just like the transparent medium, the material intellect’s functioning requires a prior actualization: just as colors shine through the transparent medium only insofar as it is itself actually illuminated, the material intellect can receive intelligible forms only insofar as it is fundamentally actualized by the agent intellect. The aim of this paper is thus to reconsider the nature of the material intellect’s potency and its formal relation to the agent intellect. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5135","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5135,"authors_free":[{"id":5913,"entry_id":5135,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":622,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","free_first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","free_last_name":"Brenet","norm_person":{"id":622,"first_name":"Jean-Baptiste","last_name":"Brenet","full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1051778867","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/27224973","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Jean-Baptiste Brenet"}}],"entry_title":"Averro\u00e8s et l'intellect mat\u00e9riel diaphane - Remarques sur une analogie variable","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averro\u00e8s et l'intellect mat\u00e9riel diaphane - Remarques sur une analogie variable"},"abstract":"This paper studies the analogy set forth by Averroes in his Great Commentary on the De anima between the material intellect and the transparent medium. The overall context of the present inquiry is the 'question of Theophrastus' concerning the nature of the material intellect. The paper argues that the analogy between material intellect and transparent medium arises because, just like the transparent medium, the material intellect\u2019s functioning requires a prior actualization: just as colors shine through the transparent medium only insofar as it is itself actually illuminated, the material intellect can receive intelligible forms only insofar as it is fundamentally actualized by the agent intellect. The aim of this paper is thus to reconsider the nature of the material intellect\u2019s potency and its formal relation to the agent intellect.","btype":3,"date":"2018","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.2143\/RTPM.85.2.3285391","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"}],"authors":[{"id":622,"full_name":"Jean-Baptiste Brenet","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5135,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Recherches de Th\u00e9ologie et Philosophie M\u00e9di\u00e9vales","volume":"85","issue":"2","pages":"261\u2013284"}},"sort":[2018]}
| Title | A Hidden Source? Considerations on Averroes’ Recourse to Avicenna’s Madkhal of the Shifâ’ in the Middle Commentary on Porphyry’s Isagoge |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2018 |
| Journal | Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
| Volume | 29 |
| Pages | 125–136 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Silvia Di Vincenzo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5144","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5144,"authors_free":[{"id":5923,"entry_id":5144,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Silvia Di Vincenzo","free_first_name":"Silvia","free_last_name":"Di Vincenzo","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"A Hidden Source? Considerations on Averroes\u2019 Recourse to Avicenna\u2019s Madkhal of the Shif\u00e2\u2019 in the Middle Commentary on Porphyry\u2019s Isagoge","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"A Hidden Source? Considerations on Averroes\u2019 Recourse to Avicenna\u2019s Madkhal of the Shif\u00e2\u2019 in the Middle Commentary on Porphyry\u2019s Isagoge"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2018","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5144,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"29","issue":"","pages":"125\u2013136"}},"sort":[2018]}
| Title | Della Politica di Aristotele all’”averroismo politico”. Una vicenda paradossale |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2018 |
| Journal | Mediterranea |
| Volume | 3 |
| Pages | 19–34 |
| Categories | Averroism, Politics, Aristotle, Modern Readings |
| Author(s) | Gregorio Piaia |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| From the early twentieth century onwards, the concept of ‘political Averroism’ has become widespread, especially with reference to Dante Alighieri and to Marsilius of Padua. It is our intention here to establish and delineate the remotest origin of this concept, which can be fundamentally traced back to two elements: the central role accorded to political reflection as a consequence of the French Revolution, and the adoption of Averroes as a symbol and figure anticipating modern rationalism. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5176","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5176,"authors_free":[{"id":5961,"entry_id":5176,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":684,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Gregorio Piaia","free_first_name":"Gregorio","free_last_name":"Piaia","norm_person":{"id":684,"first_name":"Gregorio","last_name":"Piaia","full_name":"Gregorio Piaia","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1141240149","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/2485674","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Gregorio Piaia"}}],"entry_title":"Della Politica di Aristotele all\u2019\u201daverroismo politico\u201d. Una vicenda paradossale","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Della Politica di Aristotele all\u2019\u201daverroismo politico\u201d. Una vicenda paradossale"},"abstract":"From the early twentieth century onwards, the concept of \u2018political Averroism\u2019 has become widespread, especially with reference to Dante Alighieri and to Marsilius of Padua. It is our intention here to establish and delineate the remotest origin of this concept, which can be fundamentally traced back to two elements: the central role accorded to political reflection as a consequence of the French Revolution, and the adoption of Averroes as a symbol and figure anticipating modern rationalism. ","btype":3,"date":"2018","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.21071\/mijtk.v0i3.10768 ","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":35,"category_name":"Modern Readings","link":"bib?categories[]=Modern Readings"}],"authors":[{"id":684,"full_name":"Gregorio Piaia","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5176,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Mediterranea","volume":"3 ","issue":"","pages":"19\u201334"}},"sort":[2018]}
| Title | Le statut «scientifique» de l’éthique d’après le Commentaire moyen d’Averroès à l’Éthique à Nicomaque d’Aristote |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2018 |
| Journal | Oriens |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | No. 3/4 |
| Pages | 332–367 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, Nicomachean ethics |
| Author(s) | Frédérique Woerther |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Following an exegetical method similar to the one used two years earlier in his Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s Rhetoric, Averroes usually stays very close to the Arabic version of the Nicomachean Ethics in his Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics. For he mostly reproduces Aristotle’s text without reformulating it. When necessary he nonetheless deletes the most obscure passages and develops those requiring more explanation, adding examples and replacing some terms with other terms, usually technical ones. By doing so, Averroes gives the ten Books of Aristotle’s treatise a greater unity and coherence. One of the commonest modifications that Averroes introduced in the Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics on the microstructural level is the use of the term scientia/ ḥokhma to refer to the content of the Ethics, whereas Aristotle’s text had no specific word for this. Likewise, Averroes makes clear in the first lines of his Commentary on the Republic that the discursive mode he is going to follow is the mode of scientific or theoretical arguments, not dialectical arguments. Hence, bestowing the status of a «science» on ethics (and on politics) clearly seems problematic – from a strictly Aristotelian perspective at any rate. This contribution seeks to understand, from Books I and X of Averroes’ Middle Commentary on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics, how the «scientific» status of ethics shall be understood, by observing in particular the inscription of the Ethics in the knowledge system as Averroes conceives it, and by raising the question of the addressee of his Middle Commentary, who obviously is no longer the Aristotelian figure of the legislator ἐπιειϰής. |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/26572345 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5407","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5407,"authors_free":[{"id":6268,"entry_id":5407,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1286,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","free_first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","free_last_name":"Woerther","norm_person":{"id":1286,"first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","last_name":"Woerther","full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/13670932X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther"}}],"entry_title":"Le statut \u00abscientifique\u00bb de l\u2019\u00e9thique d\u2019apr\u00e8s le Commentaire moyen d\u2019Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 l\u2019\u00c9thique \u00e0 Nicomaque d\u2019Aristote","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Le statut \u00abscientifique\u00bb de l\u2019\u00e9thique d\u2019apr\u00e8s le Commentaire moyen d\u2019Averro\u00e8s \u00e0 l\u2019\u00c9thique \u00e0 Nicomaque d\u2019Aristote"},"abstract":"Following an exegetical method similar to the one used two years earlier in his Middle Commentary on Aristotle\u2019s Rhetoric, Averroes usually stays very close to the Arabic version of the Nicomachean Ethics in his Middle Commentary on Aristotle\u2019s Nicomachean Ethics. For he mostly reproduces Aristotle\u2019s text without reformulating it. When necessary he nonetheless deletes the most obscure passages and develops those requiring more explanation, adding examples and replacing some terms with other terms, usually technical ones. By doing so, Averroes gives the ten Books of Aristotle\u2019s treatise a greater unity and coherence. One of the commonest modifications that Averroes introduced in the Middle Commentary on Aristotle\u2019s Nicomachean Ethics on the microstructural level is the use of the term scientia\/ \u1e25okhma to refer to the content of the Ethics, whereas Aristotle\u2019s text had no specific word for this. Likewise, Averroes makes clear in the first lines of his Commentary on the Republic that the discursive mode he is going to follow is the mode of scientific or theoretical arguments, not dialectical arguments. Hence, bestowing the status of a \u00abscience\u00bb on ethics (and on politics) clearly seems problematic \u2013 from a strictly Aristotelian perspective at any rate. This contribution seeks to understand, from Books I and X of Averroes\u2019 Middle Commentary on Aristotle\u2019s Nicomachean Ethics, how the \u00abscientific\u00bb status of ethics shall be understood, by observing in particular the inscription of the Ethics in the knowledge system as Averroes conceives it, and by raising the question of the addressee of his Middle Commentary, who obviously is no longer the Aristotelian figure of the legislator \u1f10\u03c0\u03b9\u03b5\u03b9\u03f0\u1f75\u03c2.","btype":3,"date":"2018","language":"French","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/26572345","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":70,"category_name":"Nicomachean ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Nicomachean ethics"}],"authors":[{"id":1286,"full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5407,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Oriens","volume":"46","issue":"No. 3\/4 ","pages":"332\u2013367"}},"sort":[2018]}
| Today, the basis of much political corruption can be mentioned in the presence of political morality that is built on political practices free from virtues. According to Averroes, the ethics of political morality/politics ethic provide with hegemonic power. İn the sense of overcoming this, he emphasizes on moral -based policy that takes virtues as its own origin of reference. Averroes, who takes Greek experience in the relation of morality- politics into account, gives extra weight to politics and morality relations in the building period of constitutive politics in İslamic world. As a condition of the sustenance of İslamic world in the political arena, he showed original arche/ metaphysics that refers to the virtues which should be in every area of the life. The understanding of politics and morality that is manifested in Averroes, also express the consciousness of reviving of objective political culture. Bugün birçok siyasal yozlaşmanın temelinde erdemlerden bağımsız siyasal pratikler üzerine inşa edilen bir siyasal ahlakın varlığında söz edilebilir. İbn Rüşd' göre siyasal ahlak / siyasetin ahlakı hegemonik güç sağlar. Bunun aşılması olarak erdemleri kendine referans alan ahlak temeli bir siyasete vurgu yapmaktadır. Siyaset-ahlak ilişkisinde Grek dünyasının siyaset tecrübesini dikkate alan İbn Rüşd İslam dünyasında kurucu siyasetin inşa edilmeye çalışıldığı bir dönemde siyaset ve ahlak ilişkisine daha da önem vermiştir. İslam dünyasının siyasi arenada var olmasının şartı olarak; hayatın her alanında var olması gereken erdemleri referans alan asli arche'ye/metafiziği göstermiştir. İbn Rüşd'ün de ortaya konulan siyaset ve ahlak anlayışı aynı zamanda nesnel bir siyasi kültürün dirilmesinin derin bir bilincini ifade etmektedir. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5584","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5584,"authors_free":[{"id":6482,"entry_id":5584,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":903,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Mirpen\u00e7 A\u015fkit","free_first_name":"Mirpen\u00e7 ","free_last_name":"A\u015fkit","norm_person":{"id":903,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]="}}],"entry_title":"\u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd'de Siyaset ve Ahlak \u0130li\u015fkis","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"\u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd'de Siyaset ve Ahlak \u0130li\u015fkis"},"abstract":"Today, the basis of much political corruption can be mentioned in the presence of political morality that is built on political practices free from virtues. According to Averroes, the ethics of political morality\/politics ethic provide with hegemonic power. \u0130n the sense of overcoming this, he emphasizes on moral -based policy that takes virtues as its own origin of reference. Averroes, who takes Greek experience in the relation of morality- politics into account, gives extra weight to politics and morality relations in the building period of constitutive politics in \u0130slamic world. As a condition of the sustenance of \u0130slamic world in the political arena, he showed original arche\/ metaphysics that refers to the virtues which should be in every area of the life. The understanding of politics and morality that is manifested in Averroes, also express the consciousness of reviving of objective political culture. \r\n\r\nBug\u00fcn bir\u00e7ok siyasal yozla\u015fman\u0131n temelinde erdemlerden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z siyasal pratikler \u00fczerine in\u015fa edilen bir siyasal ahlak\u0131n varl\u0131\u011f\u0131nda s\u00f6z edilebilir. \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd' g\u00f6re siyasal ahlak \/ siyasetin ahlak\u0131 hegemonik g\u00fc\u00e7 sa\u011flar. Bunun a\u015f\u0131lmas\u0131 olarak erdemleri kendine referans alan ahlak temeli bir siyasete vurgu yapmaktad\u0131r. Siyaset-ahlak ili\u015fkisinde Grek d\u00fcnyas\u0131n\u0131n siyaset tecr\u00fcbesini dikkate alan \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd \u0130slam d\u00fcnyas\u0131nda kurucu siyasetin in\u015fa edilmeye \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131 bir d\u00f6nemde siyaset ve ahlak ili\u015fkisine daha da \u00f6nem vermi\u015ftir. \u0130slam d\u00fcnyas\u0131n\u0131n siyasi arenada var olmas\u0131n\u0131n \u015fart\u0131 olarak; hayat\u0131n her alan\u0131nda var olmas\u0131 gereken erdemleri referans alan asli arche'ye\/metafizi\u011fi g\u00f6stermi\u015ftir. \u0130bn R\u00fc\u015fd'\u00fcn de ortaya konulan siyaset ve ahlak anlay\u0131\u015f\u0131 ayn\u0131 zamanda nesnel bir siyasi k\u00fclt\u00fcr\u00fcn dirilmesinin derin bir bilincini ifade etmektedir.","btype":3,"date":"2018","language":"Turkish","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":22,"category_name":"Ethics","link":"bib?categories[]=Ethics"},{"id":4,"category_name":"Politics","link":"bib?categories[]=Politics"}],"authors":[{"id":903,"full_name":"","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5584,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Igdir University Journal of Social Sciences","volume":"16","issue":"","pages":"47-65"}},"sort":[2018]}
| Title | Averroismi al plurale. La ricezione del Tafsîr kitâb al-nafs di Ibn Rushd nel Commento alle Sentenze di Tommaso d’Aquino |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Italian |
| Date | 2017 |
| Journal | Dianoia |
| Volume | 24 |
| Pages | 15-32 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, De anima, Averroism, Siger of Brabant, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Federico Minzoni |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| A widespread historiographic commonplace, established by Thomas Aquinas himself in his Tractatus de unitate intellectus (1270), takes Siger of Brabant’s Quaestiones in tertium de anima (ca. 1265) to be a latin formulation of Ibn Rušd’s theory of the unity of the material intellect as exposed in the Tafsīr Kitāb al-Nafs (Long Commentary on the De anima, ca. 1186); according to the same view, Aquinas’ philosophy of mind would be the expression of a strongly antiaverroistic – and therefore more orthodox – kind of aristotelianism. Building on a thorough analysis of key texts in Aquinas’ Commentary on the Sentences (1255), I argue in this paper that those who hold Aquinas’ noetic to be anti-averroistic are greatly mistaken: while Siger’s always superficial rushdian inspiration is better understood against the background of a neoplatonic-tinged mind-body dualism clearly at odds with Ibn Rušd’s own strictly peripatetic ontology, Aquinas’ psychology, hylomorfic and not-dualist at its core, is aristotelian mainly inasmuch as it is rushdian. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5154","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5154,"authors_free":[{"id":5935,"entry_id":5154,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1682,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Federico Minzoni","free_first_name":"Federico","free_last_name":"Minzoni","norm_person":{"id":1682,"first_name":"Federico","last_name":"Minzoni","full_name":"Federico Minzoni","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Federico Minzoni"}}],"entry_title":"Averroismi al plurale. La ricezione del Tafs\u00eer kit\u00e2b al-nafs di Ibn Rushd nel Commento alle Sentenze di Tommaso d\u2019Aquino","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroismi al plurale. La ricezione del Tafs\u00eer kit\u00e2b al-nafs di Ibn Rushd nel Commento alle Sentenze di Tommaso d\u2019Aquino"},"abstract":"A widespread historiographic commonplace, established by Thomas Aquinas himself in his Tractatus de unitate intellectus (1270), takes Siger of Brabant\u2019s Quaestiones in tertium de anima (ca. 1265) to be a latin formulation of Ibn Ru\u0161d\u2019s theory of the unity of the material intellect as exposed in the Tafs\u012br Kit\u0101b al-Nafs (Long Commentary on the De anima, ca. 1186); according to the same view, Aquinas\u2019 philosophy of mind would be the expression of a strongly antiaverroistic \u2013 and therefore more orthodox \u2013 kind of aristotelianism. Building on a thorough analysis of key texts in Aquinas\u2019 Commentary on the Sentences (1255), I argue in this paper that those who hold Aquinas\u2019 noetic to be anti-averroistic are greatly mistaken: while Siger\u2019s always superficial rushdian inspiration is better understood against the background of a neoplatonic-tinged mind-body dualism clearly at odds with Ibn Ru\u0161d\u2019s own strictly peripatetic ontology, Aquinas\u2019 psychology, hylomorfic and not-dualist at its core, is aristotelian mainly inasmuch as it is rushdian. ","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"Italian","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":1,"category_name":"Averroism","link":"bib?categories[]=Averroism"},{"id":57,"category_name":"Siger of Brabant","link":"bib?categories[]=Siger of Brabant"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":1682,"full_name":"Federico Minzoni","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5154,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Dianoia","volume":"24","issue":"","pages":"15-32"}},"sort":[2017]}
| Title | Comparisons between al-Ġazālī and Ibn Rušd in the Late Ottoman Period |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2017 |
| Journal | Mélanges de l’Université Saint-Joseph |
| Volume | 67 |
| Categories | al-Ġazālī, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | M. Sait Özervarli |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5157","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5157,"authors_free":[{"id":5938,"entry_id":5157,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"M. Sait \u00d6zervarli ","free_first_name":"M. Sait","free_last_name":"\u00d6zervarli","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Comparisons between al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b and Ibn Ru\u0161d in the Late Ottoman Period","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Comparisons between al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b and Ibn Ru\u0161d in the Late Ottoman Period"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":14,"category_name":"al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-\u0120az\u0101l\u012b"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5157,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"M\u00e9langes de l\u2019Universit\u00e9 Saint-Joseph","volume":"67","issue":"","pages":""}},"sort":[2017]}
| Title | Some Remarks on Averroes’ Long Commentary on the Metaphysics Book Alpha Meizon |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2017 |
| Journal | Entelekya Logico-Metaphysical Review |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 5–17 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Metaphysics, Commentary |
| Author(s) | Ilyas Altuner |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Averroes, considered to be the greatest Aristotelian commentator in the Middle Ages, has written three different types of commentary on almost all the works of this great philosopher: short, middle and long. These commentaries have been translated into Latin and Hebrew in the early period, and profoundly influenced both Medieval Europe and Jewish thought for centuries. The effect of Averroes in the West was to spread the whole of Europe under the name of Latin Averroism. The text what you have consists of some remarks about the translation of the commentary on the ‘Book Alpha Meizon’, the second book of Averroes’ Tafsīr Mā Ba’d at-Ṭabī’a. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5186","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5186,"authors_free":[{"id":5975,"entry_id":5186,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Ilyas Altuner","free_first_name":"Ilyas","free_last_name":"Altuner","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Some Remarks on Averroes\u2019 Long Commentary on the Metaphysics Book Alpha Meizon","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Some Remarks on Averroes\u2019 Long Commentary on the Metaphysics Book Alpha Meizon"},"abstract":"Averroes, considered to be the greatest Aristotelian commentator in the Middle Ages, has written three different types of commentary on almost all the works of this great philosopher: short, middle and long. These commentaries have been translated into Latin and Hebrew in the early period, and profoundly influenced both Medieval Europe and Jewish thought for centuries. The effect of Averroes in the West was to spread the whole of Europe under the name of Latin Averroism. The text what you have consists of some remarks about the translation of the commentary on the \u2018Book Alpha Meizon\u2019, the second book of Averroes\u2019 Tafs\u012br M\u0101 Ba\u2019d at-\u1e6cab\u012b\u2019a.","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5186,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Entelekya Logico-Metaphysical Review","volume":"1","issue":"1-2 ","pages":"5\u201317"}},"sort":[2017]}
| Title | Citer/traduire. La traduction arabo-latine de la Rhétorique d’Aristote par Hermann l’Allemand et les citations d’al-Fârâbî et Averroès |
| Type | Article |
| Language | French |
| Date | 2017 |
| Journal | Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale |
| Volume | 28 |
| Pages | 177–218 |
| Categories | Aristotle, al-Fārābī, Tradition and Reception, Rhetoric |
| Author(s) | Frédérique Woerther |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5200","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5200,"authors_free":[{"id":5993,"entry_id":5200,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1286,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","free_first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","free_last_name":"Woerther","norm_person":{"id":1286,"first_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique","last_name":"Woerther","full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/13670932X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther"}}],"entry_title":"Citer\/traduire. La traduction arabo-latine de la Rh\u00e9torique d\u2019Aristote par Hermann l\u2019Allemand et les citations d\u2019al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee et Averro\u00e8s","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Citer\/traduire. La traduction arabo-latine de la Rh\u00e9torique d\u2019Aristote par Hermann l\u2019Allemand et les citations d\u2019al-F\u00e2r\u00e2b\u00ee et Averro\u00e8s"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"2017","language":"French","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":28,"category_name":"al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b","link":"bib?categories[]=al-F\u0101r\u0101b\u012b"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"},{"id":48,"category_name":"Rhetoric","link":"bib?categories[]=Rhetoric"}],"authors":[{"id":1286,"full_name":"Fr\u00e9d\u00e9rique Woerther","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5200,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Documenti e studi sulla tradizione filosofica medievale","volume":"28","issue":"","pages":"177\u2013218"}},"sort":[2017]}
| Title | Averroes als Aristoteleskommentator |
| Type | Article |
| Language | German |
| Date | 1964 |
| Journal | Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenländischen Gesellschaft |
| Volume | 114 |
| Pages | 59–65 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Commentary, Tradition and Reception |
| Author(s) | Helmut Gätje |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/43369708 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1954","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1954,"authors_free":[{"id":2390,"entry_id":1954,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":240,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Helmut G\u00e4tje","free_first_name":"Helmut","free_last_name":"G\u00e4tje","norm_person":{"id":240,"first_name":"","last_name":"","full_name":"Helmut G\u00e4tje","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1021419966","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/29561534","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Helmut G\u00e4tje"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes als Aristoteleskommentator","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes als Aristoteleskommentator"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"1964","language":"German","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/43369708","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":23,"category_name":"Commentary","link":"bib?categories[]=Commentary"},{"id":43,"category_name":"Tradition and Reception","link":"bib?categories[]=Tradition and Reception"}],"authors":[{"id":240,"full_name":"Helmut G\u00e4tje","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1954,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Zeitschrift der Deutschen Morgenl\u00e4ndischen Gesellschaft","volume":"114","issue":null,"pages":"59\u201365"}},"sort":["Averroes als Aristoteleskommentator"]}
| Title | Averroes and Aquinas on Aristotle's Criterion of Substantiality |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2009 |
| Journal | Arabic Sciences and Philosophy |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 157–187 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Thomas |
| Author(s) | Gabriele Galluzzo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| The paper analyses Averroes's and Aquinas's different reconstructions of Aristotle's ontology in the central books of the Metaphysics. The main claim the paper argues for is that Averroes endorses an explanatory criterion of substantiality, while Aquinas favours an independent existence criterion. The result of these different choices is that the Arabic commentator believes that the forms of sensible objects are more substances than the objects of which they are the forms, while the Dominican Master sticks to the traditional picture that sensible objects hold some kind of priority over their ontological constituents in general and over form in particular. For Averroes, therefore, the central books of the Metaphysics mark a major departure from the Categories ontology, where particular sensible objects are regarded as fundamental entities and so primary substances. On Aquinas's reconstruction, by contrast, sensible objects are still thought of in the Metaphysics as primary substances in spite of their being analysable into matter and form. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1386","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1386,"authors_free":[{"id":1578,"entry_id":1386,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1288,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Gabriele Galluzzo","free_first_name":"Gabriele","free_last_name":"Galluzzo","norm_person":{"id":1288,"first_name":"Gabriele","last_name":"Galluzzo","full_name":"Gabriele Galluzzo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1027244637","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/61842398","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Gabriele Galluzzo"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and Aquinas on Aristotle's Criterion of Substantiality","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes and Aquinas on Aristotle's Criterion of Substantiality"},"abstract":"The paper analyses Averroes's and Aquinas's different reconstructions of Aristotle's ontology in the central books of the Metaphysics. The main claim the paper argues for is that Averroes endorses an explanatory criterion of substantiality, while Aquinas favours an independent existence criterion. The result of these different choices is that the Arabic commentator believes that the forms of sensible objects are more substances than the objects of which they are the forms, while the Dominican Master sticks to the traditional picture that sensible objects hold some kind of priority over their ontological constituents in general and over form in particular. For Averroes, therefore, the central books of the Metaphysics mark a major departure from the Categories ontology, where particular sensible objects are regarded as fundamental entities and so primary substances. On Aquinas's reconstruction, by contrast, sensible objects are still thought of in the Metaphysics as primary substances in spite of their being analysable into matter and form.","btype":3,"date":"2009","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"}],"authors":[{"id":1288,"full_name":"Gabriele Galluzzo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1386,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Arabic Sciences and Philosophy","volume":"19","issue":"2","pages":"157\u2013187"}},"sort":["Averroes and Aquinas on Aristotle's Criterion of Substantiality"]}
| Title | Averroes and Aquinas on the Agent Intellect’s Causation of the Intelligible |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2015 |
| Journal | Recherches de Théologie et Philosophie médiévales |
| Volume | 82 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1–60 |
| Categories | Thomas, Psychology, Metaphysics |
| Author(s) | Therese Scarpelli Cory |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This article examines two medieval thinkers – Averroes and Aquinas – on the kind of causation exercised by the agent intellect in 'abstracting' or producing intelligibles from images in the imagination. It argues that abstraction in these thinkers should be interpreted in causal terms, as an act whereby images in the imagination, through the power of the agent intellect, educe their intelligible likeness in a receptive intellect. This Averroean-Thomistic causal approach to abstraction offers an intriguing alternative to the usual approach to abstraction as an epistemological content-sorting. The article also demonstrates the extensive common ground uniting these thinkers’ cognition theories, despite Aquinas’s well-known rejection of Averroes’s theory of separate Intellects. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5277","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5277,"authors_free":[{"id":6093,"entry_id":5277,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1760,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Therese Scarpelli Cory","free_first_name":"Therese Scarpelli","free_last_name":"Cory","norm_person":{"id":1760,"first_name":"Therese Scarpelli","last_name":"Cory","full_name":"Therese Scarpelli Cory","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":null,"dnb_url":"https:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1050852745","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":null,"link":"bib?authors[]=Therese Scarpelli Cory"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and Aquinas on the Agent Intellect\u2019s Causation of the Intelligible","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and Aquinas on the Agent Intellect\u2019s Causation of the Intelligible"},"abstract":"This article examines two medieval thinkers \u2013 Averroes and Aquinas \u2013 on the kind of causation exercised by the agent intellect in 'abstracting' or producing intelligibles from images in the imagination. It argues that abstraction in these thinkers should be interpreted in causal terms, as an act whereby images in the imagination, through the power of the agent intellect, educe their intelligible likeness in a receptive intellect. This Averroean-Thomistic causal approach to abstraction offers an intriguing alternative to the usual approach to abstraction as an epistemological content-sorting. The article also demonstrates the extensive common ground uniting these thinkers\u2019 cognition theories, despite Aquinas\u2019s well-known rejection of Averroes\u2019s theory of separate Intellects.","btype":3,"date":"2015","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":51,"category_name":"Thomas","link":"bib?categories[]=Thomas"},{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"}],"authors":[{"id":1760,"full_name":"Therese Scarpelli Cory","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5277,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Recherches de Th\u00e9ologie et Philosophie m\u00e9di\u00e9vales","volume":"82","issue":"1","pages":"1\u201360"}},"sort":["Averroes and Aquinas on the Agent Intellect\u2019s Causation of the Intelligible"]}
| Title | Averroes and Aristotle's Philosophical Dictionary. Prolegomena to an Annotated Translation of Averroes's Greater Commentary on Book V of the Metaphysics |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1989 |
| Journal | The Modern Schoolman |
| Volume | 66 |
| Pages | 95–115 |
| Categories | Metaphysics, Aristotle |
| Author(s) | Philipp W. Rosemann |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"597","_score":null,"_source":{"id":597,"authors_free":[{"id":748,"entry_id":597,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":715,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Philipp W. Rosemann","free_first_name":"Philipp W.","free_last_name":"Rosemann","norm_person":{"id":715,"first_name":"Philipp W.","last_name":"Rosemann","full_name":"Philipp W. Rosemann","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/139263446","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/39480135","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Philipp W. Rosemann"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and Aristotle's Philosophical Dictionary. Prolegomena to an Annotated Translation of Averroes's Greater Commentary on Book V of the Metaphysics","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes and Aristotle's Philosophical Dictionary. Prolegomena to an Annotated Translation of Averroes's Greater Commentary on Book V of the Metaphysics"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1989","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"}],"authors":[{"id":715,"full_name":"Philipp W. Rosemann","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":597,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Modern Schoolman","volume":"66","issue":null,"pages":"95\u2013115"}},"sort":["Averroes and Aristotle's Philosophical Dictionary. Prolegomena to an Annotated Translation of Averroes's Greater Commentary on Book V of the Metaphysics"]}
| Title | Averroes and Hegel on Religion and Philosophy: Discussing Catarina Belo’s Recent Book |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2016 |
| Journal | Oriente Moderno |
| Volume | 96 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 329–335 |
| Categories | Review |
| Author(s) | Massimo Campanini |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Review of Catarina Belo's "Averroes and Hegel on Religion and Philosophy" |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/44280776 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5141","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5141,"authors_free":[{"id":5920,"entry_id":5141,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":755,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Massimo Campanini","free_first_name":"Massimo","free_last_name":"Campanini","norm_person":{"id":755,"first_name":"Massimo","last_name":"Campanini","full_name":"Massimo Campanini","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1116088959","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/36958023","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Massimo Campanini"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and Hegel on Religion and Philosophy: Discussing Catarina Belo\u2019s Recent Book","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and Hegel on Religion and Philosophy: Discussing Catarina Belo\u2019s Recent Book"},"abstract":"Review of Catarina Belo's \"Averroes and Hegel on Religion and Philosophy\"","btype":3,"date":"2016","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/44280776","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":49,"category_name":"Review","link":"bib?categories[]=Review"}],"authors":[{"id":755,"full_name":"Massimo Campanini","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5141,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Oriente Moderno","volume":"96","issue":"2","pages":"329\u2013335"}},"sort":["Averroes and Hegel on Religion and Philosophy: Discussing Catarina Belo\u2019s Recent Book"]}
| Title | Averroes and Maimonides |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1948 |
| Journal | Thought |
| Volume | 23 |
| Pages | 621–640 |
| Categories | Maimonides |
| Author(s) | James Brodrick |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1674","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1674,"authors_free":[{"id":1934,"entry_id":1674,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1449,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"James Brodrick","free_first_name":"James","free_last_name":"Brodrick","norm_person":{"id":1449,"first_name":"James","last_name":"Brodrick","full_name":"James Brodrick","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132218402","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/42992740","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=James Brodrick"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and Maimonides","title_transcript":null,"title_translation":null,"main_title":{"title":"Averroes and Maimonides"},"abstract":null,"btype":3,"date":"1948","language":"English","online_url":null,"doi_url":null,"ti_url":null,"categories":[{"id":9,"category_name":"Maimonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Maimonides"}],"authors":[{"id":1449,"full_name":"James Brodrick","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":1674,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Thought","volume":"23","issue":null,"pages":"621\u2013640"}},"sort":["Averroes and Maimonides"]}
| Title | Averroes and Maimonides in the Obligation of Philosophic Contemplation (i'tibār) / אבן רשד והרמב"ם על חובת ההתבוננות הפילוסופית (אעתבאר) |
| Type | Article |
| Language | Hebrew |
| Journal | Tarbiẕ |
| Pages | 75-83 |
| Categories | Maimonides |
| Author(s) | Warren Zev Harvey |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Online Access | https://www.jstor.org/stable/23597779 |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5721","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5721,"authors_free":[{"id":6629,"entry_id":5721,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":886,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Warren Zev Harvey","free_first_name":"Warren Zev ","free_last_name":"Harvey","norm_person":{"id":886,"first_name":"Zev","last_name":"Harvey","full_name":"Zev Harvey","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/142942847","viaf_url":"https:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/115907841","db_url":"https:\/\/www.deutsche-biographie.de\/pnd142942847.html","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Zev Harvey"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and Maimonides in the Obligation of Philosophic Contemplation (i'tib\u0101r) \/ \u05d0\u05d1\u05df \u05e8\u05e9\u05d3 \u05d5\u05d4\u05e8\u05de\u05d1\"\u05dd \u05e2\u05dc \u05d7\u05d5\u05d1\u05ea \u05d4\u05d4\u05ea\u05d1\u05d5\u05e0\u05e0\u05d5\u05ea \u05d4\u05e4\u05d9\u05dc\u05d5\u05e1\u05d5\u05e4\u05d9\u05ea (\u05d0\u05e2\u05ea\u05d1\u05d0\u05e8)","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and Maimonides in the Obligation of Philosophic Contemplation (i'tib\u0101r) \/ \u05d0\u05d1\u05df \u05e8\u05e9\u05d3 \u05d5\u05d4\u05e8\u05de\u05d1\"\u05dd \u05e2\u05dc \u05d7\u05d5\u05d1\u05ea \u05d4\u05d4\u05ea\u05d1\u05d5\u05e0\u05e0\u05d5\u05ea \u05d4\u05e4\u05d9\u05dc\u05d5\u05e1\u05d5\u05e4\u05d9\u05ea (\u05d0\u05e2\u05ea\u05d1\u05d0\u05e8)"},"abstract":"","btype":3,"date":"","language":"Hebrew","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/23597779","doi_url":"","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":9,"category_name":"Maimonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Maimonides"}],"authors":[{"id":886,"full_name":"Zev Harvey","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5721,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Tarbi\u1e95","volume":"","issue":"","pages":"75-83"}},"sort":["Averroes and Maimonides in the Obligation of Philosophic Contemplation (i'tib\u0101r) \/ \u05d0\u05d1\u05df \u05e8\u05e9\u05d3 \u05d5\u05d4\u05e8\u05de\u05d1\"\u05dd \u05e2\u05dc \u05d7\u05d5\u05d1\u05ea \u05d4\u05d4\u05ea\u05d1\u05d5\u05e0\u05e0\u05d5\u05ea \u05d4\u05e4\u05d9\u05dc\u05d5\u05e1\u05d5\u05e4\u05d9\u05ea (\u05d0\u05e2\u05ea\u05d1\u05d0\u05e8)"]}
| Title | Averroes and Maimonides on Equivocal Terms in the Qur’ân and the Torah |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2019 |
| Journal | The Muslim World |
| Volume | 109 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 615–626 |
| Categories | Maimonides, Theology |
| Author(s) | Terence J. Kleven |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This essay is a brief exploration of the Scriptural exegesis of the most noteworthy sons of Cordoba, Averroes or Ibn Rushd (1126-1198) and Moses Maimonides or Rambam (1135-1204). We will examine the manner of their exegesis of the Scriptural texts, the Qur'an and the Torah, of their respective religious communities. Although Averroes is nine years older than Maimonides, they are near contemporaries. We do not know whether in their youths these Cordobans ever met; they will emerge as two of the most renowned scholars and judges of their communities. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5095","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5095,"authors_free":[{"id":5868,"entry_id":5095,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1332,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Terence J. Kleven","free_first_name":"Terence J. ","free_last_name":"Kleven","norm_person":{"id":1332,"first_name":"Terence J.","last_name":"Kleven","full_name":"Terence J. Kleven","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/1050705157","viaf_url":"http:\/\/viaf.org\/viaf\/308213722","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Terence J. Kleven"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and Maimonides on Equivocal Terms in the Qur\u2019\u00e2n and the Torah","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and Maimonides on Equivocal Terms in the Qur\u2019\u00e2n and the Torah"},"abstract":"This essay is a brief exploration of the Scriptural exegesis of the most noteworthy sons of Cordoba, Averroes or Ibn Rushd (1126-1198) and Moses Maimonides or Rambam (1135-1204). We will examine the manner of their exegesis of the Scriptural texts, the Qur'an and the Torah, of their respective religious communities. Although Averroes is nine years older than Maimonides, they are near contemporaries. We do not know whether in their youths these Cordobans ever met; they will emerge as two of the most renowned scholars and judges of their communities.","btype":3,"date":"2019","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":" https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1111\/muwo.12313","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":9,"category_name":"Maimonides","link":"bib?categories[]=Maimonides"},{"id":39,"category_name":"Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1332,"full_name":"Terence J. Kleven","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5095,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"The Muslim World","volume":"109","issue":"4","pages":"615\u2013626"}},"sort":["Averroes and Maimonides on Equivocal Terms in the Qur\u2019\u00e2n and the Torah"]}
| Title | Averroes and Narboni on the Material Intellect |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 1984 |
| Journal | AJS Review |
| Volume | 9 |
| Pages | 175–184 |
| Categories | Psychology, Intellect |
| Author(s) | Herbert A. Davidson |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Questions regarding the human intellect haunted Averroes throughout his philosophic career; no less than seven of his preserved works treat the human intellect formally, while others, naturally enough, also do so incidentally. Here I shall point out that the seven aforementioned works fall into a sequence, that a recently published text of Averroes' has its place within the sequence, and that Moses Narboni misread Averroes for reasons to be explained. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"812","_score":null,"_source":{"id":812,"authors_free":[{"id":976,"entry_id":812,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":249,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Herbert A. Davidson","free_first_name":"Herbert A.","free_last_name":"Davidson","norm_person":{"id":249,"first_name":"Herbert","last_name":"Davidson","full_name":"Herbert Davidson","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/15814743X","viaf_url":"","db_url":"NULL","from_claudius":0,"link":"bib?authors[]=Herbert Davidson"}}],"entry_title":"Averroes and Narboni on the Material Intellect","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and Narboni on the Material Intellect"},"abstract":"Questions regarding the human intellect haunted Averroes throughout his philosophic career; no less than seven of his preserved works treat the human intellect formally, while others, naturally enough, also do so incidentally. Here I shall point out that the seven aforementioned works fall into a sequence, that a recently published text of Averroes' has its place within the sequence, and that Moses Narboni misread Averroes for reasons to be explained.","btype":3,"date":"1984","language":"English","online_url":"https:\/\/www.jstor.org\/stable\/1486320","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/S0364009400000933","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":12,"category_name":"Psychology","link":"bib?categories[]=Psychology"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"}],"authors":[{"id":249,"full_name":"Herbert Davidson","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":812,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"AJS Review","volume":"9","issue":null,"pages":"175\u2013184"}},"sort":["Averroes and Narboni on the Material Intellect"]}
| Title | Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas Debate: How does the Moslem Philosopher understand Aristotle's Philosophy about Soul and Intellect? |
| Type | Article |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2023 |
| Journal | International Journal of Cultural and Religious Studies |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 51-58 |
| Categories | Aristotle, De anima, Intellect, Aquinas |
| Author(s) | Elka Anakotta |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| Arabs have penetrated the joints of Europa thought through a process of transliteration involving Islamic philosophers. While medieval Europe was a dark age, Arabs provided opportunities and space for the transliteration of the works of Plato and Aristotle. Thinkers (Islamic philosophers) penetrated the joints of European thought through the process of transliteration, one of which was Averroes, who attempted to re-perceive the soul and intellect of Aristotle, which later differed from the understanding built by St. Thomas Aquinas. From their position as Islamic philosophers, Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas as Christian philosophers, their faith interests also enriched the conflict over the nderstanding of Aristotle's philosophy, especially about soul and intellect. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5796","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5796,"authors_free":[{"id":6717,"entry_id":5796,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":null,"person_id":null,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Elka Anakotta","free_first_name":"Elka","free_last_name":"Anakotta","norm_person":null}],"entry_title":"Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas Debate: How does the Moslem Philosopher understand Aristotle's Philosophy about Soul and Intellect?","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas Debate: How does the Moslem Philosopher understand Aristotle's Philosophy about Soul and Intellect?"},"abstract":"Arabs have penetrated the joints of Europa thought through a process of transliteration involving Islamic philosophers. While medieval Europe was a dark age, Arabs provided opportunities and space for the transliteration of the works of Plato and Aristotle. Thinkers (Islamic philosophers) penetrated the joints of European thought through the process of transliteration, one of which was Averroes, who attempted to re-perceive the soul and intellect of Aristotle, which later differed from the understanding built by St. Thomas Aquinas. From their position as Islamic philosophers, Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas as Christian philosophers, their faith interests also enriched the conflict over the nderstanding of Aristotle's philosophy, especially about soul and intellect.","btype":3,"date":"2023","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"10.32996\/ijcrs.2023.3.2.7","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":46,"category_name":"De anima","link":"bib?categories[]=De anima"},{"id":75,"category_name":"Intellect","link":"bib?categories[]=Intellect"},{"id":2,"category_name":"Aquinas","link":"bib?categories[]=Aquinas"}],"authors":[],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5796,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"International Journal of Cultural and Religious Studies","volume":"3","issue":"2","pages":"51-58"}},"sort":["Averroes and St. Thomas Aquinas Debate: How does the Moslem Philosopher understand Aristotle's Philosophy about Soul and Intellect?"]}